Four aces of heart failure therapy: systematic review of established and emerging therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Q4 Medicine
E. Ruffino, M. Gori, E. D’Elia, E. Sciatti, V. Shi, M. Senni
{"title":"Four aces of heart failure therapy: systematic review of established and emerging therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction","authors":"E. Ruffino, M. Gori, E. D’Elia, E. Sciatti, V. Shi, M. Senni","doi":"10.1097/CP9.0000000000000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a common disease requiring multi-drug therapy. Moreover, it is associated with a poor prognosis, with increasing prevalence in the community. In the last decade, two major drug classes were introduced to the heart failure (HF) specialist's arsenal: angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) and sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is). The current paradigm of sequential drug therapy is changing, favoring a multi-drug combination therapy upfront, including four “pillar” classes: beta-blockers, mineralcorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), ARNIs, and SGLT-2is. Recent putative placebo analyses of large-scale randomized clinical trials compared a combination of all four drug classes with a standard of care and was in favor of the multi-drug combination revealing a hazard ratio for cardiovascular (CV) death and HF hospitalization of 0.5 and 0.32, respectively. We reviewed the approval landmark trials for the four drug classes and have subincluded a short comment about the implications and impact of each study in clinical practice. Moreover, we present more detailed trials concerning the use of these drugs in different settings (eg, acute phase, in-hospital, and outpatient) and more data about the clinical, biochemical, functional, and echographic remodeling effects of the molecules. The results of the meta-analyses and putative placebo analyses in the literature we reviewed suggest the benefit of offering all the best therapy available upfront. This approach ensures maximal life expectancy gain, especially in younger patients, and cuts the costs of rehospitalizations. Thus, this review underlines the importance of the four-drug approach to HFrEF therapy, as recently stated in the ESC guidelines.","PeriodicalId":52908,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Plus","volume":"7 1","pages":"20 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CP9.0000000000000007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a common disease requiring multi-drug therapy. Moreover, it is associated with a poor prognosis, with increasing prevalence in the community. In the last decade, two major drug classes were introduced to the heart failure (HF) specialist's arsenal: angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) and sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is). The current paradigm of sequential drug therapy is changing, favoring a multi-drug combination therapy upfront, including four “pillar” classes: beta-blockers, mineralcorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), ARNIs, and SGLT-2is. Recent putative placebo analyses of large-scale randomized clinical trials compared a combination of all four drug classes with a standard of care and was in favor of the multi-drug combination revealing a hazard ratio for cardiovascular (CV) death and HF hospitalization of 0.5 and 0.32, respectively. We reviewed the approval landmark trials for the four drug classes and have subincluded a short comment about the implications and impact of each study in clinical practice. Moreover, we present more detailed trials concerning the use of these drugs in different settings (eg, acute phase, in-hospital, and outpatient) and more data about the clinical, biochemical, functional, and echographic remodeling effects of the molecules. The results of the meta-analyses and putative placebo analyses in the literature we reviewed suggest the benefit of offering all the best therapy available upfront. This approach ensures maximal life expectancy gain, especially in younger patients, and cuts the costs of rehospitalizations. Thus, this review underlines the importance of the four-drug approach to HFrEF therapy, as recently stated in the ESC guidelines.
心力衰竭治疗的四大王牌:射血分数降低的心力衰竭已有和新兴治疗方法的系统综述
心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)是一种常见病,需要多种药物治疗。此外,它与预后不良有关,在社区的流行率越来越高。在过去的十年中,两种主要的药物类别被引入心力衰竭(HF)专家的药库:血管紧张素受体neprilysin抑制剂(ARNIs)和钠-葡萄糖-共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2is)。目前顺序药物治疗的模式正在发生变化,倾向于多药联合治疗,包括四种“支柱”类别:β受体阻滞剂、矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)、ARNIs和sglt -2。最近对大规模随机临床试验进行的假定安慰剂分析比较了所有四种药物类别与标准护理的组合,并倾向于多药物组合,显示心血管(CV)死亡和心衰住院的风险比分别为0.5和0.32。我们回顾了四种药物类别的里程碑式批准试验,并对每项研究在临床实践中的意义和影响进行了简短的评论。此外,我们提出了更多关于这些药物在不同情况下(如急性期、住院和门诊)使用的详细试验,以及更多关于这些分子的临床、生化、功能和超声重塑作用的数据。我们回顾的文献中荟萃分析和假定的安慰剂分析的结果表明,预先提供所有最好的治疗方法是有益的。这种方法确保最大限度地延长预期寿命,特别是在年轻患者中,并减少再住院的费用。因此,本综述强调了四药联合治疗HFrEF的重要性,正如ESC指南最近所述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信