Bridget J. Crawford, Jessica Adlam, Cecilia Bonetti, Velislava Bozhinova, Olivia Brenner, Megan Carbia, Leandra Cilindrello, Rachel D'Ambrosio, Erin Davies, A. DeCola, Giovanna DiFilippo, A. Epstein, Jennifer Fineman, Vilma Gamarra, K. Henderson, Jacqueline Jonczyk, Jon Khan, Kerri Krippel, Bernadette Maligranda, Vanessa Neal, Mackenzie O'Brien, Erika Panzarino, Bhumi Patel, Victoria Piekarz, Elisabeth Podlubny, Xavier Prescod, Daniel Presser, Karli Regalbuto, Roberta Rosenberg, R. Rosenblum, Julianna Sedlacko, Sam Simpson, A. Spinner, Ophilia Tommy, Sylvia Vcherashansky, Drew Wares, A. Weissman, Sagar B. Yadav, Komali Yaskhi
{"title":"Reflections on Feminism, Law & Culture: Law Students’ Perspectives","authors":"Bridget J. Crawford, Jessica Adlam, Cecilia Bonetti, Velislava Bozhinova, Olivia Brenner, Megan Carbia, Leandra Cilindrello, Rachel D'Ambrosio, Erin Davies, A. DeCola, Giovanna DiFilippo, A. Epstein, Jennifer Fineman, Vilma Gamarra, K. Henderson, Jacqueline Jonczyk, Jon Khan, Kerri Krippel, Bernadette Maligranda, Vanessa Neal, Mackenzie O'Brien, Erika Panzarino, Bhumi Patel, Victoria Piekarz, Elisabeth Podlubny, Xavier Prescod, Daniel Presser, Karli Regalbuto, Roberta Rosenberg, R. Rosenblum, Julianna Sedlacko, Sam Simpson, A. Spinner, Ophilia Tommy, Sylvia Vcherashansky, Drew Wares, A. Weissman, Sagar B. Yadav, Komali Yaskhi","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay is a collective reflection by thirty-nine law students on feminism, law and culture. In the Spring 2020 semester, the students enrolled in the Feminist Legal Theory course taught by Professor Bridget Crawford at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University were a mixed group of men and women, second-year, third-year and fourth-year students. The course focused on the themes and methods of feminist analysis and the application of feminist legal theories to topics such as intimate partner violence, prostitution, pornography, sexual harassment, reproductive rights, and economic rights. Students attended a traditional seminar meeting once each week. Conversations continued throughout the week in a student-led asynchronous written on-line discussion forum, with a different group of student facilitators choosing the topic and guiding the conversation each week. This essay is an edited collection of student posts to the course’s online forum. It is intended to memorialize the interests, concerns, and contributions of this particular group of law students to feminist discourse during the Spring 2020 semester — a time when legal education and most aspects of American life were disrupted in an unprecedented way by the novel corona virus. \n \nThe essay organizes around ten discrete topics that reflect, but are not identical to, course material. Participants use TED talks and other videos, podcasts and news stories as entry points for engaging with topics of mutual interest. These include the nature of gender differences, the impact of gender differences on the workplace and family life, menstruation, motherhood, and feminist coalition-building. The essay both reflects students’ understanding of feminist legal theory as a distinct mode of academic inquiry and challenges feminist scholars to consider what “counts” as feminist topics from the perspective of current law students. It is a contemporaneous record of the substantive issues that these law students found important in the present moment.","PeriodicalId":82250,"journal":{"name":"Pace law review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3528.2026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay is a collective reflection by thirty-nine law students on feminism, law and culture. In the Spring 2020 semester, the students enrolled in the Feminist Legal Theory course taught by Professor Bridget Crawford at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University were a mixed group of men and women, second-year, third-year and fourth-year students. The course focused on the themes and methods of feminist analysis and the application of feminist legal theories to topics such as intimate partner violence, prostitution, pornography, sexual harassment, reproductive rights, and economic rights. Students attended a traditional seminar meeting once each week. Conversations continued throughout the week in a student-led asynchronous written on-line discussion forum, with a different group of student facilitators choosing the topic and guiding the conversation each week. This essay is an edited collection of student posts to the course’s online forum. It is intended to memorialize the interests, concerns, and contributions of this particular group of law students to feminist discourse during the Spring 2020 semester — a time when legal education and most aspects of American life were disrupted in an unprecedented way by the novel corona virus.
The essay organizes around ten discrete topics that reflect, but are not identical to, course material. Participants use TED talks and other videos, podcasts and news stories as entry points for engaging with topics of mutual interest. These include the nature of gender differences, the impact of gender differences on the workplace and family life, menstruation, motherhood, and feminist coalition-building. The essay both reflects students’ understanding of feminist legal theory as a distinct mode of academic inquiry and challenges feminist scholars to consider what “counts” as feminist topics from the perspective of current law students. It is a contemporaneous record of the substantive issues that these law students found important in the present moment.