Reflections on Feminism, Law & Culture: Law Students’ Perspectives

Bridget J. Crawford, Jessica Adlam, Cecilia Bonetti, Velislava Bozhinova, Olivia Brenner, Megan Carbia, Leandra Cilindrello, Rachel D'Ambrosio, Erin Davies, A. DeCola, Giovanna DiFilippo, A. Epstein, Jennifer Fineman, Vilma Gamarra, K. Henderson, Jacqueline Jonczyk, Jon Khan, Kerri Krippel, Bernadette Maligranda, Vanessa Neal, Mackenzie O'Brien, Erika Panzarino, Bhumi Patel, Victoria Piekarz, Elisabeth Podlubny, Xavier Prescod, Daniel Presser, Karli Regalbuto, Roberta Rosenberg, R. Rosenblum, Julianna Sedlacko, Sam Simpson, A. Spinner, Ophilia Tommy, Sylvia Vcherashansky, Drew Wares, A. Weissman, Sagar B. Yadav, Komali Yaskhi
{"title":"Reflections on Feminism, Law & Culture: Law Students’ Perspectives","authors":"Bridget J. Crawford, Jessica Adlam, Cecilia Bonetti, Velislava Bozhinova, Olivia Brenner, Megan Carbia, Leandra Cilindrello, Rachel D'Ambrosio, Erin Davies, A. DeCola, Giovanna DiFilippo, A. Epstein, Jennifer Fineman, Vilma Gamarra, K. Henderson, Jacqueline Jonczyk, Jon Khan, Kerri Krippel, Bernadette Maligranda, Vanessa Neal, Mackenzie O'Brien, Erika Panzarino, Bhumi Patel, Victoria Piekarz, Elisabeth Podlubny, Xavier Prescod, Daniel Presser, Karli Regalbuto, Roberta Rosenberg, R. Rosenblum, Julianna Sedlacko, Sam Simpson, A. Spinner, Ophilia Tommy, Sylvia Vcherashansky, Drew Wares, A. Weissman, Sagar B. Yadav, Komali Yaskhi","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay is a collective reflection by thirty-nine law students on feminism, law and culture. In the Spring 2020 semester, the students enrolled in the Feminist Legal Theory course taught by Professor Bridget Crawford at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University were a mixed group of men and women, second-year, third-year and fourth-year students. The course focused on the themes and methods of feminist analysis and the application of feminist legal theories to topics such as intimate partner violence, prostitution, pornography, sexual harassment, reproductive rights, and economic rights. Students attended a traditional seminar meeting once each week. Conversations continued throughout the week in a student-led asynchronous written on-line discussion forum, with a different group of student facilitators choosing the topic and guiding the conversation each week. This essay is an edited collection of student posts to the course’s online forum. It is intended to memorialize the interests, concerns, and contributions of this particular group of law students to feminist discourse during the Spring 2020 semester — a time when legal education and most aspects of American life were disrupted in an unprecedented way by the novel corona virus. \n \nThe essay organizes around ten discrete topics that reflect, but are not identical to, course material. Participants use TED talks and other videos, podcasts and news stories as entry points for engaging with topics of mutual interest. These include the nature of gender differences, the impact of gender differences on the workplace and family life, menstruation, motherhood, and feminist coalition-building. The essay both reflects students’ understanding of feminist legal theory as a distinct mode of academic inquiry and challenges feminist scholars to consider what “counts” as feminist topics from the perspective of current law students. It is a contemporaneous record of the substantive issues that these law students found important in the present moment.","PeriodicalId":82250,"journal":{"name":"Pace law review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3528.2026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay is a collective reflection by thirty-nine law students on feminism, law and culture. In the Spring 2020 semester, the students enrolled in the Feminist Legal Theory course taught by Professor Bridget Crawford at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University were a mixed group of men and women, second-year, third-year and fourth-year students. The course focused on the themes and methods of feminist analysis and the application of feminist legal theories to topics such as intimate partner violence, prostitution, pornography, sexual harassment, reproductive rights, and economic rights. Students attended a traditional seminar meeting once each week. Conversations continued throughout the week in a student-led asynchronous written on-line discussion forum, with a different group of student facilitators choosing the topic and guiding the conversation each week. This essay is an edited collection of student posts to the course’s online forum. It is intended to memorialize the interests, concerns, and contributions of this particular group of law students to feminist discourse during the Spring 2020 semester — a time when legal education and most aspects of American life were disrupted in an unprecedented way by the novel corona virus. The essay organizes around ten discrete topics that reflect, but are not identical to, course material. Participants use TED talks and other videos, podcasts and news stories as entry points for engaging with topics of mutual interest. These include the nature of gender differences, the impact of gender differences on the workplace and family life, menstruation, motherhood, and feminist coalition-building. The essay both reflects students’ understanding of feminist legal theory as a distinct mode of academic inquiry and challenges feminist scholars to consider what “counts” as feminist topics from the perspective of current law students. It is a contemporaneous record of the substantive issues that these law students found important in the present moment.
对女权主义、法律与文化的反思:法学学生的视角
这篇文章是39名法律系学生对女权主义、法律和文化的集体反思。2020年春季学期,参加佩斯大学伊丽莎白·豪布法学院布里奇特·克劳福德教授教授的女权主义法律理论课程的学生是一群男女混合的学生,有二年级、三年级和四年级的学生。本课程侧重于女权主义分析的主题和方法,以及女权主义法律理论在亲密伴侣暴力、卖淫、色情、性骚扰、生殖权利和经济权利等主题中的应用。学生们每周参加一次传统的研讨会。在一个由学生主导的异步在线书面讨论论坛上,对话持续了一周,每周由不同组的学生主持人选择主题并指导对话。这篇文章是经过编辑的学生在课程在线论坛上发表的文章。它旨在纪念这一特殊的法律学生群体在2020年春季学期对女权主义话语的兴趣、关注和贡献——当时,新型冠状病毒以前所未有的方式扰乱了法律教育和美国生活的大多数方面。文章组织围绕十个离散的主题,反映,但不完全相同,课程材料。参与者使用TED演讲和其他视频、播客和新闻故事作为切入点,参与共同感兴趣的话题。其中包括性别差异的本质、性别差异对工作场所和家庭生活的影响、月经、母性和女权主义联盟的建立。这篇文章既反映了学生们对女权主义法学理论作为一种独特的学术研究模式的理解,也挑战了女权主义学者们从当前法律系学生的角度来考虑什么“算作”女权主义话题。它是这些法学学生认为在当前重要的实质性问题的同时代记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书