Pharmacotherapy prescribing pattern and outcome for hospitalized patients with severe and critical COVID-19

IF 0.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
H. Assad
{"title":"Pharmacotherapy prescribing pattern and outcome for hospitalized patients with severe and critical COVID-19","authors":"H. Assad","doi":"10.2478/cipms-2022-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There are many treatment modalities for COVID-19 – with varied outcome. Therefore, authors designed this study to assess prescribing patterns and the clinical outcome for hospitalized patients with severe and critical COVID-19 so as to determine the most effective approach. Authors conducted a retrospective observational study on 346 adult patients with either severe or critical COVID-19, who were admitted to public hospitals in Al-Najaf city, Iraq from June to September 2020. Patients’ information, medications and outcomes were collected from their medical records in the registered office of the hospital. A total of 346 patients were enrolled, with a majority of patients being adults above 35 years old and male (70.2%). Most patients (81%) received corticosteroid as dexamethasone, and about 45% of all patients were given convalescent plasma therapy, while a few patients were prescribed antiviral favipiravir (23%) and lopinavir/ritonavir (19%). As supportive care medications, anticoagulant such as enoxaparin was administered to most of the patients (93%) and more than half of all patients received the broad-spectrum antibiotic, meropenem. The majority of the patients recovered and were discharged alive (66%), however, the in- hospital mortality rate was 26%. Interestingly, patients treated with enoxaparin alone or in combination with hydroxychloroquine were associated with better outcome. The prescribing pattern of COVID-19 specific medications and supportive care is aligned with guideline recommendations and associated with a beneficial therapeutic outcome.","PeriodicalId":11071,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":"106 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cipms-2022-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract There are many treatment modalities for COVID-19 – with varied outcome. Therefore, authors designed this study to assess prescribing patterns and the clinical outcome for hospitalized patients with severe and critical COVID-19 so as to determine the most effective approach. Authors conducted a retrospective observational study on 346 adult patients with either severe or critical COVID-19, who were admitted to public hospitals in Al-Najaf city, Iraq from June to September 2020. Patients’ information, medications and outcomes were collected from their medical records in the registered office of the hospital. A total of 346 patients were enrolled, with a majority of patients being adults above 35 years old and male (70.2%). Most patients (81%) received corticosteroid as dexamethasone, and about 45% of all patients were given convalescent plasma therapy, while a few patients were prescribed antiviral favipiravir (23%) and lopinavir/ritonavir (19%). As supportive care medications, anticoagulant such as enoxaparin was administered to most of the patients (93%) and more than half of all patients received the broad-spectrum antibiotic, meropenem. The majority of the patients recovered and were discharged alive (66%), however, the in- hospital mortality rate was 26%. Interestingly, patients treated with enoxaparin alone or in combination with hydroxychloroquine were associated with better outcome. The prescribing pattern of COVID-19 specific medications and supportive care is aligned with guideline recommendations and associated with a beneficial therapeutic outcome.
重症和危重症新冠肺炎住院患者的药物治疗处方模式和结果
摘要新冠肺炎有多种治疗方式,结果各不相同。因此,作者设计了这项研究,以评估重症和危重症新冠肺炎住院患者的处方模式和临床结果,从而确定最有效的方法。作者对2020年6月至9月入住伊拉克Al-Najaf市公立医院的346名成年新冠肺炎重症或危重患者进行了回顾性观察性研究。患者的信息、药物和结果是从医院注册办公室的医疗记录中收集的。共有346名患者入选,其中大多数患者为35岁以上的成年人和男性(70.2%)。大多数患者(81%)接受了地塞米松类皮质类固醇治疗,约45%的患者接受了恢复期血浆治疗,少数患者接受了抗病毒药物法匹拉韦(23%)和洛匹那韦/利托那韦(19%)。作为支持性护理药物,大多数患者(93%)服用了依诺肝素等抗凝剂,超过一半的患者服用了广谱抗生素美罗培南。大多数患者康复出院(66%),但住院死亡率为26%。有趣的是,单独使用依诺肝素或联合使用羟氯喹的患者预后更好。新冠肺炎特定药物和支持性护理的处方模式与指南建议一致,并与有益的治疗结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences
Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信