"too soon too soon too soon": Continuity, Blame, and the Limits of the Present in As I Lay Dying

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Pardis Dabashi
{"title":"\"too soon too soon too soon\": Continuity, Blame, and the Limits of the Present in As I Lay Dying","authors":"Pardis Dabashi","doi":"10.1353/arq.2019.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Taking William Faulkner's As I Lay Dying as its central object of inquiry, this essay engages current debates about the narrative form and politics of the modern novel. Through an analysis of Faulkner's most putatively antirealist novel, this essay argues that modernism has a far more vexed relationship to plot and causality than scholarship has suggested. As Faulkner experiments with present tense narration, the characters clamor to deliver themselves from the modernist textuality that the embodied present unleashes. They reach for psychic structures such as blame—blame being a fundamentally causal structuring of events—to wrest narrative meaning from the temporal flux to which their author has subjected them. As I Lay Dying exemplifies what I argue is modernism's understudied preoccupation with the possibility that to abandon realist temporality may be to claim one's literary modernity, but it also amounts to a form of authorial cruelty.","PeriodicalId":42394,"journal":{"name":"Arizona Quarterly","volume":"75 1","pages":"107 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/arq.2019.0022","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2019.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Taking William Faulkner's As I Lay Dying as its central object of inquiry, this essay engages current debates about the narrative form and politics of the modern novel. Through an analysis of Faulkner's most putatively antirealist novel, this essay argues that modernism has a far more vexed relationship to plot and causality than scholarship has suggested. As Faulkner experiments with present tense narration, the characters clamor to deliver themselves from the modernist textuality that the embodied present unleashes. They reach for psychic structures such as blame—blame being a fundamentally causal structuring of events—to wrest narrative meaning from the temporal flux to which their author has subjected them. As I Lay Dying exemplifies what I argue is modernism's understudied preoccupation with the possibility that to abandon realist temporality may be to claim one's literary modernity, but it also amounts to a form of authorial cruelty.
“太早太快太快”:《我弥留之际》中的连续性、责备和当下的局限
摘要:本文以福克纳的《我弥留之际》为中心,对现代小说的叙事形式和政治进行了探讨。通过对福克纳最具反现实主义色彩的小说的分析,本文认为现代主义与情节和因果关系的关系远比学术界所认为的更为棘手。当福克纳尝试现在时叙事时,人物们吵着要从体现的现在所释放的现代主义文本中解脱出来。他们寻求诸如指责之类的心理结构——指责是事件的一种根本因果结构——从作者所经历的时间变化中夺取叙事意义。正如《我弥留之际》所展示的那样,我认为现代主义对一种可能性的研究不足,即放弃现实主义的时间性可能就是宣称一个人的文学现代性,但这也相当于一种作家的残忍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arizona Quarterly
Arizona Quarterly LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Arizona Quarterly publishes scholarly essays on American literature, culture, and theory. It is our mission to subject these categories to debate, argument, interpretation, and contestation via critical readings of primary texts. We accept essays that are grounded in textual, formal, cultural, and theoretical examination of texts and situated with respect to current academic conversations whilst extending the boundaries thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信