The Effects of Discipline Membership and Experience in the Field on Scholars’ Book and Journal Format Preferences

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Ana Dubnjakovic
{"title":"The Effects of Discipline Membership and Experience in the Field on Scholars’ Book and Journal Format Preferences","authors":"Ana Dubnjakovic","doi":"10.1080/01462679.2019.1669251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using data from Ithaka S + R US Faculty Survey 2015, the current study examined the influence of disciplinary differences and experience levels as well as their interactions on scholars’ attitudes toward print and electronic materials. While results of 3 × 5 factorial ANOVA procedure indicated both disciplinary membership and experience played a role in scholars’ attitudes, effect size indicated disciplinary membership played a more crucial role. Significant findings include rising popularity of electronic formats across examined groups.","PeriodicalId":43910,"journal":{"name":"Collection Management","volume":"45 1","pages":"162 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01462679.2019.1669251","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2019.1669251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Using data from Ithaka S + R US Faculty Survey 2015, the current study examined the influence of disciplinary differences and experience levels as well as their interactions on scholars’ attitudes toward print and electronic materials. While results of 3 × 5 factorial ANOVA procedure indicated both disciplinary membership and experience played a role in scholars’ attitudes, effect size indicated disciplinary membership played a more crucial role. Significant findings include rising popularity of electronic formats across examined groups.
学科成员和学科经验对学者图书期刊格式偏好的影响
本研究利用2015年Ithaka S + R US Faculty Survey的数据,考察了学科差异和经验水平及其相互作用对学者对印刷和电子材料态度的影响。虽然3 × 5因子方差分析结果显示学科成员和经验对学者的态度都有影响,但效应量表明学科成员的作用更为关键。重要的发现包括电子格式在被调查群体中越来越受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collection Management
Collection Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
44.40%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The management and development of library collections is constantly evolving. Collection Management is the essential refereed quarterly journal that presents practical, research-based information about building, administering, preserving, assessing, and organizing library collections. The journal offers library professionals of all types crucial guidance in the fast-changing field of collection management, including the latest developments in sharing and providing access to resources, creating digital collections, preserving both traditional and digital library resources, applying technological developments to managing collections, training and developing staff.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信