"A. I. Richards": Can Artificial Intelligence Appreciate Poetry?

IF 0.1 3区文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM

PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE Pub Date : 2021-06-29 DOI:10.1353/phl.2021.0005

J. Phelan

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The message read: "Our new artificial intelligence program will replace Professor R. in tomorrow's literary criticism seminar." Would this make a difference? I dismiss the response that artificial intelligence cannot critically appreciate literature as it lacks emotion, and argue that it is the lack of a sense of significance that is important. I take this sense of significance to be a kind of abductive reasoning that identifies literary detail as important and, what is more, does so in a way that is of interest to many readers. The paper ends with a fivefold challenge to any institution thinking of replacing literature professors with machines.

查看原文本刊更多论文

“a·i·理查兹”:人工智能能欣赏诗歌吗?

摘要:这条信息是这样写的:“我们新的人工智能程序将在明天的文学评论研讨会上取代r教授。”这会有什么不同吗?我不认为人工智能因为缺乏情感而无法批判性地欣赏文学，而是认为缺乏意义感才是重要的。我认为这种重要性是一种溯因推理，它认为文学细节是重要的，更重要的是，以一种让许多读者感兴趣的方式。这篇论文最后对任何想用机器取代文学教授的机构提出了五项挑战。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE Multiple-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： For more than a quarter century, Philosophy and Literature has explored the dialogue between literary and philosophical studies. The journal offers a constant source of fresh, stimulating ideas in the aesthetics of literature, theory of criticism, philosophical interpretation of literature, and literary treatment of philosophy. Philosophy and Literature challenges the cant and pretensions of academic priesthoods by publishing an assortment of lively, wide-ranging essays, notes, and reviews that are written in clear, jargon-free prose. In his regular column, editor Denis Dutton targets the fashions and inanities of contemporary intellectual life.