The Nexus of Government Spending, Price, Output, and Money in the ECOWAS Sub-Region: Evidence from Panel ARDL and Causality Approach

M. Dada, S. Posu, Osaretin Godspower Okungbowa, Bamidele P. Abalaba
{"title":"The Nexus of Government Spending, Price, Output, and Money in the ECOWAS Sub-Region: Evidence from Panel ARDL and Causality Approach","authors":"M. Dada, S. Posu, Osaretin Godspower Okungbowa, Bamidele P. Abalaba","doi":"10.2478/eb-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The question of how macroeconomic variables dynamically interact is very crucial in any broad-based economic integration aiming at expanding economic growth and living standard in any human society. This study examined the nexus of government spending, price, output, and money in the ECOWAS sub-region using panel ARDL and causality approach. Data covering the period (1981–2019) were collected mainly from the latest version of the World Development Indicators. The result showed a positive relationship between government spending with GDP, import, exchange rate, unemployment rate, and population growth rate but a negative relationship between government spending with inflation, money supply, export, and interest rate. The result further showed short-run unidirectional causality running from government spending to inflation, money supply to inflation as well as money supply to GDP. Short-run bi-directional causality existed between GDP and inflation but none between government spending and GDP nor between government spending and money supply. The result of long-run Granger causality test showed bi-directional causality between government spending with inflation, government spending, and money supply; GDP and inflation; and GDP and money supply. Unidirectional causality ran from GDP to government spending; and money supply to inflation. The overall implication of this study established that an increase in government spending lowered inflation and raised the living standard of people in the ECOWAS sub-region in the long run. The study therefore concluded that any rise in import, unemployment rate, exchange rate, and population growth rate would raise government spending growth rate in the short run; and an increase in government spending would shrink inflation and boost economic growth and living standard in the long run.","PeriodicalId":31810,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Business","volume":"35 1","pages":"71 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2021-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The question of how macroeconomic variables dynamically interact is very crucial in any broad-based economic integration aiming at expanding economic growth and living standard in any human society. This study examined the nexus of government spending, price, output, and money in the ECOWAS sub-region using panel ARDL and causality approach. Data covering the period (1981–2019) were collected mainly from the latest version of the World Development Indicators. The result showed a positive relationship between government spending with GDP, import, exchange rate, unemployment rate, and population growth rate but a negative relationship between government spending with inflation, money supply, export, and interest rate. The result further showed short-run unidirectional causality running from government spending to inflation, money supply to inflation as well as money supply to GDP. Short-run bi-directional causality existed between GDP and inflation but none between government spending and GDP nor between government spending and money supply. The result of long-run Granger causality test showed bi-directional causality between government spending with inflation, government spending, and money supply; GDP and inflation; and GDP and money supply. Unidirectional causality ran from GDP to government spending; and money supply to inflation. The overall implication of this study established that an increase in government spending lowered inflation and raised the living standard of people in the ECOWAS sub-region in the long run. The study therefore concluded that any rise in import, unemployment rate, exchange rate, and population growth rate would raise government spending growth rate in the short run; and an increase in government spending would shrink inflation and boost economic growth and living standard in the long run.
西非经共体次区域政府支出、价格、产出和货币之间的关系:来自小组ARDL和因果关系方法的证据
摘要宏观经济变量如何动态互动的问题在任何旨在扩大人类社会经济增长和生活水平的广泛经济一体化中都是至关重要的。这项研究使用小组ARDL和因果关系方法研究了西非经共体次区域政府支出、价格、产出和货币之间的关系。涵盖这一时期(1981年至2019年)的数据主要来自最新版本的《世界发展指标》。结果表明,政府支出与GDP、进口、汇率、失业率和人口增长率呈正相关,而与通货膨胀、货币供应、出口和利率呈负相关。结果进一步表明,从政府支出到通货膨胀、货币供应到通货膨胀以及货币供应到GDP的短期单向因果关系。GDP和通货膨胀之间存在短期双向因果关系,但政府支出和GDP之间以及政府支出和货币供应之间没有因果关系。长期Granger因果检验结果表明,政府支出与通货膨胀、政府支出和货币供应量之间存在双向因果关系;国内生产总值和通货膨胀;以及国内生产总值和货币供应量。GDP与政府支出之间存在单向因果关系;以及货币供应对通货膨胀的影响。这项研究的总体意义表明,从长远来看,政府支出的增加降低了西非经共体次区域的通货膨胀,提高了人民的生活水平。因此,该研究得出结论,进口、失业率、汇率和人口增长率的任何上升都将在短期内提高政府支出增长率;从长远来看,增加政府支出将抑制通货膨胀,提高经济增长和生活水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信