Between center-periphery and left-right: A comparison of traditional and new regionalist parties’ strategies in Galicia during the Great Recession

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Margarita Gómez-Reino, Hugo Marcos-Marné
{"title":"Between center-periphery and left-right: A comparison of traditional and new regionalist parties’ strategies in Galicia during the Great Recession","authors":"Margarita Gómez-Reino, Hugo Marcos-Marné","doi":"10.18042/cepc/rep.196.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explains the rise, success, and subsequent failure of new challenger formations in the Galician party system during the Great Recession. For that, it focuses on the multidimensional electoral strategies developed by Alternativa Galega de Esquerda (AGE) and En Marea, comparing them to that of the traditional Bloque Nacionalista Galego (BNG). Our analysis shows the different strategies displayed by the BNG and new challengers (AGE, and later En Marea), examining both the electoral supply (framing and party programmatic positions) and demand (voter positions). We find a new subsuming strategy developed by AGE and En Marea, which prioritized left-wing anti-austerity policies over core pro-periphery ones. The paper demonstrates the potential of this new strategy during the Great Recession but also its limitations, linking its demise to the organizational weakness that prevented electoral realignment, and ultimately allowed the BNG to regain its leading role in the territorial dimension of competition.","PeriodicalId":45899,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Estudios Politicos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Estudios Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.196.05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explains the rise, success, and subsequent failure of new challenger formations in the Galician party system during the Great Recession. For that, it focuses on the multidimensional electoral strategies developed by Alternativa Galega de Esquerda (AGE) and En Marea, comparing them to that of the traditional Bloque Nacionalista Galego (BNG). Our analysis shows the different strategies displayed by the BNG and new challengers (AGE, and later En Marea), examining both the electoral supply (framing and party programmatic positions) and demand (voter positions). We find a new subsuming strategy developed by AGE and En Marea, which prioritized left-wing anti-austerity policies over core pro-periphery ones. The paper demonstrates the potential of this new strategy during the Great Recession but also its limitations, linking its demise to the organizational weakness that prevented electoral realignment, and ultimately allowed the BNG to regain its leading role in the territorial dimension of competition.
在中间边缘和左右之间:大衰退期间加利西亚传统和新地方主义政党的策略比较
本文解释了大衰退期间加利西亚政党体系中新挑战者的兴起、成功和随后的失败。为此,本文聚焦于Galega de Esquerda (AGE)和En mararea的多维选举策略,并将其与传统的Galega Nacionalista (BNG)进行比较。我们的分析显示了BNG和新的挑战者(AGE和后来的En Marea)所表现出的不同策略,同时考察了选举供应(框架和政党纲领立场)和需求(选民立场)。我们发现了一种新的包容策略,该策略将左翼的反紧缩政策置于核心的亲外围政策之上。本文论证了这一新战略在大衰退期间的潜力,但也指出了其局限性,将其消亡与阻碍选举重组的组织弱点联系起来,并最终使BNG重新获得其在领土竞争方面的主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista De Estudios Politicos
Revista De Estudios Politicos POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信