Running out of steam on emerging markets? The limits of MNE firm-specific advantages in China

IF 2.2 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS
Louise Curran, L. K. Ng
{"title":"Running out of steam on emerging markets? The limits of MNE firm-specific advantages in China","authors":"Louise Curran, L. K. Ng","doi":"10.1108/MBR-11-2017-0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which the firm-specific advantages (FSAs) which underlie international expansion have proved resilient for European multinational enterprises (MNEs) operating in a key emerging market – China.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors adopt a qualitative, case study approach, using interview data to explore the companies’ FSAs on market entry, how they evolved over time and the strategies adopted to defend them. They undertook 15 in-depth interviews with decision makers in six companies addressing their experience since market entry. To control for sector-level effects, the authors focus on companies in the environmental protection sector.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors found examples of significant erosion of the FSAs among the case study companies, which undermined their position on the host market and their long-term competitiveness. The key sources of erosion were limitations in market access, exclusion from local networks and the emergence and upgrading of local competitors, often firms with whom the MNEs had collaborated in the past.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe relatively small number of cases (six) limits the generalisability of the findings by the authors. However, the authors are convinced that, given that the case companies are generally large and have long experience in China, the conclusions made are well grounded. In addition, there was the high level of coherence in the reported experiences of the interviewees, providing further support for the findings.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe experience of these case study companies highlights that MNEs have difficulty retaining their unique FSAs when faced with rapidly evolving local competition in a key emerging market. Key strategies mobilised included focussing on a sub-sector of the market and localising both the company and their supply chains. The difficulties experiencing by these case study companies in retaining their FSAs underline the need for MNEs in emerging markets to avoid complacency and constantly innovate, but they also raise questions about their capacity to extend their international reach in the long term.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nVery few studies have explored the FSAs of firms and how they evolve over time using a case study-based qualitative approach, especially in emerging markets.\n","PeriodicalId":46630,"journal":{"name":"Multinational Business Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/MBR-11-2017-0098","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multinational Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-11-2017-0098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which the firm-specific advantages (FSAs) which underlie international expansion have proved resilient for European multinational enterprises (MNEs) operating in a key emerging market – China. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt a qualitative, case study approach, using interview data to explore the companies’ FSAs on market entry, how they evolved over time and the strategies adopted to defend them. They undertook 15 in-depth interviews with decision makers in six companies addressing their experience since market entry. To control for sector-level effects, the authors focus on companies in the environmental protection sector. Findings The authors found examples of significant erosion of the FSAs among the case study companies, which undermined their position on the host market and their long-term competitiveness. The key sources of erosion were limitations in market access, exclusion from local networks and the emergence and upgrading of local competitors, often firms with whom the MNEs had collaborated in the past. Research limitations/implications The relatively small number of cases (six) limits the generalisability of the findings by the authors. However, the authors are convinced that, given that the case companies are generally large and have long experience in China, the conclusions made are well grounded. In addition, there was the high level of coherence in the reported experiences of the interviewees, providing further support for the findings. Practical implications The experience of these case study companies highlights that MNEs have difficulty retaining their unique FSAs when faced with rapidly evolving local competition in a key emerging market. Key strategies mobilised included focussing on a sub-sector of the market and localising both the company and their supply chains. The difficulties experiencing by these case study companies in retaining their FSAs underline the need for MNEs in emerging markets to avoid complacency and constantly innovate, but they also raise questions about their capacity to extend their international reach in the long term. Originality/value Very few studies have explored the FSAs of firms and how they evolve over time using a case study-based qualitative approach, especially in emerging markets.
对新兴市场失去信心?跨国公司在中国特有优势的局限性
目的本文的目的是探讨作为国际扩张基础的企业特定优势(FSA)在多大程度上对在关键新兴市场——中国运营的欧洲跨国企业(MNE)具有弹性。设计/方法论/方法作者采用定性的案例研究方法,使用访谈数据来探索公司进入市场的FSA,它们是如何随着时间的推移而演变的,以及为保护它们而采取的策略。他们对六家公司的决策者进行了15次深入采访,讲述了他们进入市场以来的经历。为了控制部门层面的影响,作者将重点放在环境保护部门的公司上。研究结果作者在案例研究公司中发现了FSA受到严重侵蚀的例子,这削弱了它们在东道国市场的地位和长期竞争力。侵蚀的主要来源是市场准入的限制、被排除在当地网络之外以及当地竞争对手的出现和升级,这些竞争对手通常是跨国公司过去合作过的公司。研究局限性/含义相对较少的病例(6例)限制了作者研究结果的普遍性。然而,作者确信,鉴于这些案例公司通常规模较大,在中国有着长期的经验,得出的结论是有根据的。此外,受访者报告的经历高度一致,为调查结果提供了进一步的支持。实际含义这些案例研究公司的经验突出表明,跨国公司在关键新兴市场面临快速演变的本地竞争时,很难保留其独特的FSA。调动的关键战略包括专注于市场的一个子行业,并将公司及其供应链本地化。这些案例研究公司在保留FSA方面遇到的困难突出表明,新兴市场的跨国公司需要避免自满情绪,不断创新,但它们也对其长期扩大国际影响力的能力提出了质疑。独创性/价值很少有研究使用基于案例研究的定性方法来探讨企业的FSA以及它们如何随着时间的推移而演变,尤其是在新兴市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.80%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Multinational Business Review publishes high quality and innovative peer-review research on the strategy, organization and performance of multinational enterprise (MNE), international business history, geography of international business, and the impact of international business on economic growth and development. The journal encourages papers that are cross-disciplinary in nature, and that address new and important issues in international business. Multinational Business Review also promotes research on under-represented regions such as Africa, Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America, and South East Asia and their MNEs, as well as under-studied topics such as the role of trade, investment and other public policies. Specific topics of interest include innovation and entrepreneurship in an international context; corporate governance and ownership; social, environmental and political risk; the role of multilateral institutions; and the nature of emerging market multinationals. The title seeks strong conceptual studies, contributing to the advancement of theories and frameworks, and sound empirical work, whether qualitative or quantitative, suggesting managerial, economic or government policy recommendations. The journal encourages replication studies that contribute to our understanding of the reliability and validity of current knowledge. Finally, Multinational Business Review welcomes proposals for perspectives pieces that offer critical and challenging viewpoints; surveys of the literature particularly those that use new and innovative bibliometric methods; and special issues on topics of relevance to Multinational Business Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信