Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV). Beneficial or not?

Denise Wheatley, Krystal Young
{"title":"Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV). Beneficial or not?","authors":"Denise Wheatley, Krystal Young","doi":"10.53097/jmv.10026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ventilators functions and features have evolved with the advancement of technology along with the addition of microprocessors. It is important to understand and examine the benefits and risks associated with these advanced automated modes. Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) is a mode that is unique to the Hamilton Medical ventilators, thereby limiting the number of clinicians who have experience with using this mode. ASV can make changes to respiratory rate and tidal volume and adjusting the driving pressure in the absence of a professional. ASV changes ventilator strategies when it detects changes to a patient’s lung dynamics. The scope of ASV mode is not universally understood. Respiratory therapists may feel their position would be threatened with the use of smart automated modes. This paper will aim to review the literature on the ASV mode of ventilation. The literature review will address the following research questions to broaden the understanding of the risks and benefits of the ASV mode. 1) Is the ASV mode effective for weaning patients? 2) Is ASV a safe mode of ventilation for patients with COPD and ARDS? 3) Is ASV a safe mode of ventilation with changes in lung dynamics? 4) Does ASV impact the bedside respiratory therapist? Conclusions: ASV appears to be at least effective or even more superior to other modes especially during weaning off mechanical ventilation, and in other forms of respiratory failure. More studies in different clinical conditions and head-to-head with other modes. Keywords: ASV, COPD, ARDS, Weaning","PeriodicalId":73813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53097/jmv.10026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ventilators functions and features have evolved with the advancement of technology along with the addition of microprocessors. It is important to understand and examine the benefits and risks associated with these advanced automated modes. Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) is a mode that is unique to the Hamilton Medical ventilators, thereby limiting the number of clinicians who have experience with using this mode. ASV can make changes to respiratory rate and tidal volume and adjusting the driving pressure in the absence of a professional. ASV changes ventilator strategies when it detects changes to a patient’s lung dynamics. The scope of ASV mode is not universally understood. Respiratory therapists may feel their position would be threatened with the use of smart automated modes. This paper will aim to review the literature on the ASV mode of ventilation. The literature review will address the following research questions to broaden the understanding of the risks and benefits of the ASV mode. 1) Is the ASV mode effective for weaning patients? 2) Is ASV a safe mode of ventilation for patients with COPD and ARDS? 3) Is ASV a safe mode of ventilation with changes in lung dynamics? 4) Does ASV impact the bedside respiratory therapist? Conclusions: ASV appears to be at least effective or even more superior to other modes especially during weaning off mechanical ventilation, and in other forms of respiratory failure. More studies in different clinical conditions and head-to-head with other modes. Keywords: ASV, COPD, ARDS, Weaning
自适应支持通风(ASV)。是否有益?
随着技术的进步以及微处理器的加入,通风机的功能和特点也在不断发展。了解和检查与这些高级自动化模式相关的好处和风险非常重要。自适应支持通气(ASV)是汉密尔顿医疗呼吸机独有的一种模式,因此限制了有使用该模式经验的临床医生的数量。ASV可以在没有专业人员的情况下改变呼吸频率和潮气量,并调整驾驶压力。ASV在检测到患者肺部动力学变化时会改变呼吸机策略。ASV模式的范围尚未得到普遍理解。呼吸治疗师可能会觉得,使用智能自动化模式会威胁到他们的地位。本文旨在回顾有关ASV通气模式的文献。文献综述将解决以下研究问题,以拓宽对ASV模式风险和收益的理解。1) ASV模式对断奶患者有效吗?2) ASV是COPD和ARDS患者的安全通气模式吗?3) ASV是一种安全的通气模式吗?4) ASV会影响床边呼吸治疗师吗?结论:ASV似乎至少比其他模式有效,甚至更优越,尤其是在脱离机械通气的情况下,以及在其他形式的呼吸衰竭中。在不同的临床条件下进行更多的研究,并与其他模式进行正面交锋。关键词:ASV、COPD、ARDS、断奶
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信