Employee Opinions about Partial Annuitization in a Retirement Plan

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Michael R. Finke, Jason J. Fichtner
{"title":"Employee Opinions about Partial Annuitization in a Retirement Plan","authors":"Michael R. Finke, Jason J. Fichtner","doi":"10.3905/jor.2021.1.095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research finds mixed evidence of annuity preference among workers. In a survey of participants in an employer-sponsored retirement savings plan, the authors found that nearly twice as many prefer a mix of annuitized income and investments to a system that offers only investments or only a pension. When given a choice to allocate savings among stocks, bonds, and an income annuity, respondents would place 33.5% of their total retirement savings in an income annuity, and higher annuity allocations are preferred by older and average-income respondents. The most important attribute of a retirement savings plan is the ability to understand how much a retiree can safely spend. Eighty-one percent of participants indicate that they are somewhat or highly likely to prefer a retirement plan that substitutes guaranteed income for bond investments. The peace of mind offered by a product that provides a guarantee of lifetime income, the reduced fear of outliving savings, and the ability to budget spending in retirement are the most frequently cited reasons for preferring an annuity.","PeriodicalId":36429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retirement","volume":"9 1","pages":"9 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2021.1.095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research finds mixed evidence of annuity preference among workers. In a survey of participants in an employer-sponsored retirement savings plan, the authors found that nearly twice as many prefer a mix of annuitized income and investments to a system that offers only investments or only a pension. When given a choice to allocate savings among stocks, bonds, and an income annuity, respondents would place 33.5% of their total retirement savings in an income annuity, and higher annuity allocations are preferred by older and average-income respondents. The most important attribute of a retirement savings plan is the ability to understand how much a retiree can safely spend. Eighty-one percent of participants indicate that they are somewhat or highly likely to prefer a retirement plan that substitutes guaranteed income for bond investments. The peace of mind offered by a product that provides a guarantee of lifetime income, the reduced fear of outliving savings, and the ability to budget spending in retirement are the most frequently cited reasons for preferring an annuity.
员工对退休计划部分年金化的意见
先前的研究发现,工人对年金偏好的证据喜忧参半。在一项针对雇主赞助的退休储蓄计划参与者的调查中,作者发现,与只提供投资或养老金的制度相比,近两倍的人更喜欢将年金收入和投资相结合。当选择在股票、债券和收入年金中分配储蓄时,受访者会将其退休储蓄总额的33.5%用于收入年金,而年龄较大和收入一般的受访者更喜欢更高的年金分配。退休储蓄计划最重要的属性是能够了解退休人员可以安全地花多少钱。81%的参与者表示,他们在某种程度上或极有可能更喜欢用保证收入代替债券投资的退休计划。提供终身收入保障的产品所提供的安心、对超过储蓄寿命的恐惧减少,以及在退休时预算支出的能力,是人们更喜欢年金的最常见原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Retirement
Journal of Retirement Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信