Typical misinterpretations and scientific concepts in well-logging geologic studies

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Jin Lai , Xiaojiao Pang , Xin Zhao , Yidi Zhao , Guiwen Wang , Yuyue Huang , Hongbin Li , Yuhang Li
{"title":"Typical misinterpretations and scientific concepts in well-logging geologic studies","authors":"Jin Lai ,&nbsp;Xiaojiao Pang ,&nbsp;Xin Zhao ,&nbsp;Yidi Zhao ,&nbsp;Guiwen Wang ,&nbsp;Yuyue Huang ,&nbsp;Hongbin Li ,&nbsp;Yuhang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ngib.2023.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The method and theoretical system of well logging geology have been widely used in the fields of basic geology, petroleum geology and engineering geology, but the different response sensitivity of different well logging series to geological information and the mismatching between geophysical properties of multiple well logs and geological genesis of rocks frequently result in misunderstandings in the research process of well logging geology. Therefore, it is in an urgent need to analyze the typical misunderstanding cases in the research of well logging geology and explore the corresponding scientific ideas and countermeasures. After analyzing the typical misunderstandings in the research of well logging geology, this paper investigates vertical resolution scale of various logging series and its contradiction with detection depth and illustrates the importance of the integration of different scales of data. In addition, the factor inducing “fake logging data” and its influence on interpretation evaluation are clarified and a set of ideas for well logging evaluation of geological interpretation is put forward. And the following research results are obtained. First, the typical misunderstandings in the research of well logging geology can be classified into two categories, namely geological body interpretation misunderstanding and reservoir property parameter calculation misunderstanding. Second, special geological phenomena, such as high-density and high-resistivity mudstone can lead to logging data ambiguity, so attention shall be paid to petrophysical response mechanisms during geological logging interpretation. Third, to carry out well logging evaluation of unconventional oil and gas, it is necessary to integrate new technologies of electric imaging logging, dipole acoustic logging and nuclear magnetic resonance logging, and the calibration of core data and the integration of geological ideas can improve the interpretation accuracy. Fourth, In the process of borehole structural logging analysis, sedimentary response, geostress evaluation and fracture identification, geological ideas shall be integrated to avoid the logging interpretation misunderstanding caused by the same response of different geological phenomena in well logs. In conclusion, the dialectical and systematic thinking from geology to logging and then to geology, from practice to recognition and then to practice and from “a narrow view” to “a broad view” can provide a scientific ideas for the comprehensive research of well logging geology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37116,"journal":{"name":"Natural Gas Industry B","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Gas Industry B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352854023000141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The method and theoretical system of well logging geology have been widely used in the fields of basic geology, petroleum geology and engineering geology, but the different response sensitivity of different well logging series to geological information and the mismatching between geophysical properties of multiple well logs and geological genesis of rocks frequently result in misunderstandings in the research process of well logging geology. Therefore, it is in an urgent need to analyze the typical misunderstanding cases in the research of well logging geology and explore the corresponding scientific ideas and countermeasures. After analyzing the typical misunderstandings in the research of well logging geology, this paper investigates vertical resolution scale of various logging series and its contradiction with detection depth and illustrates the importance of the integration of different scales of data. In addition, the factor inducing “fake logging data” and its influence on interpretation evaluation are clarified and a set of ideas for well logging evaluation of geological interpretation is put forward. And the following research results are obtained. First, the typical misunderstandings in the research of well logging geology can be classified into two categories, namely geological body interpretation misunderstanding and reservoir property parameter calculation misunderstanding. Second, special geological phenomena, such as high-density and high-resistivity mudstone can lead to logging data ambiguity, so attention shall be paid to petrophysical response mechanisms during geological logging interpretation. Third, to carry out well logging evaluation of unconventional oil and gas, it is necessary to integrate new technologies of electric imaging logging, dipole acoustic logging and nuclear magnetic resonance logging, and the calibration of core data and the integration of geological ideas can improve the interpretation accuracy. Fourth, In the process of borehole structural logging analysis, sedimentary response, geostress evaluation and fracture identification, geological ideas shall be integrated to avoid the logging interpretation misunderstanding caused by the same response of different geological phenomena in well logs. In conclusion, the dialectical and systematic thinking from geology to logging and then to geology, from practice to recognition and then to practice and from “a narrow view” to “a broad view” can provide a scientific ideas for the comprehensive research of well logging geology.

测井地质研究中的典型误区与科学概念
测井地质学的方法和理论体系已广泛应用于基础地质学、石油地质学和工程地质学等领域,但由于不同测井系列对地质信息的响应灵敏度不同,以及多条测井的地球物理性质与岩石地质成因不匹配,往往导致测井地质学研究过程中的误解。因此,迫切需要分析测井地质研究中的典型误区,探索相应的科学思路和对策。在分析了测井地质研究中的典型误区后,研究了各种测井系列的垂直分辨率尺度及其与探测深度的矛盾,阐述了不同尺度数据集成的重要性。此外,阐明了诱发“假测井资料”的因素及其对解释评价的影响,并提出了一套地质解释测井评价的思路。并得出以下研究结果。首先,测井地质研究中的典型误区可分为两类,即地质体解释误区和储层物性参数计算误区。第二,高密度、高电阻率泥岩等特殊地质现象会导致测井数据的模糊性,在地质测井解释中应注意岩石物理响应机制。第三,开展非常规油气测井评价,需要集成电成像测井、偶极声波测井和核磁共振测井等新技术,通过岩心数据的标定和地质思想的融合,提高解释精度。第四,在钻孔结构测井分析、沉积响应、地应力评价和裂缝识别过程中,应结合地质思想,避免测井中不同地质现象的响应相同而造成测井解释误解。总之,从地质学到测井再到地质学,从实践到认识再到实践,从“窄视野”到“宽视野”的辩证系统思维,可以为测井地质学的综合研究提供科学的思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Gas Industry B
Natural Gas Industry B Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
79 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信