A critical reflection on the Health and Care Professions Council Standards of Proficiency for music therapists: A critical disability studies perspective

IF 0.7 Q4 REHABILITATION
B. Pickard
{"title":"A critical reflection on the Health and Care Professions Council Standards of Proficiency for music therapists: A critical disability studies perspective","authors":"B. Pickard","doi":"10.1177/1359457520971812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article takes the theoretical and philosophical lens of critical disability studies to critically reflect on the Health and Care Professions Council Standards of Proficiency for Arts Therapists. The discipline of critical disability studies, evolving from disability studies and the disability rights movement, is initially defined before multiple paradigms of disability are introduced as central tenets of these disciplines. The relationship between critical disability studies and music therapy is explored, with reference to seminal publications and the perceptions of music therapy within them. The Health and Care Professions Council Standards of Proficiency are then taken as a source of reflection to attempt to understand the perpetuation of medicalised perspectives in the profession and the potential friction between critical disability studies and music therapy. A selection of the Standards of Proficiency are analysed according to distinct paradigms of disability. Questions are posed to interrogate and contextualise the standards in relation to critical disability studies philosophy. From this critical reflection, a discussion emerges which reflects on the reach of these professional standards and how they might contribute to a continuing, outdated expert-model of music therapy in the United Kingdom. The article concludes by drawing these threads together in a series of recommendations to educators, practitioners and the wider profession.","PeriodicalId":42422,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Music Therapy","volume":"34 1","pages":"82 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1359457520971812","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1359457520971812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This article takes the theoretical and philosophical lens of critical disability studies to critically reflect on the Health and Care Professions Council Standards of Proficiency for Arts Therapists. The discipline of critical disability studies, evolving from disability studies and the disability rights movement, is initially defined before multiple paradigms of disability are introduced as central tenets of these disciplines. The relationship between critical disability studies and music therapy is explored, with reference to seminal publications and the perceptions of music therapy within them. The Health and Care Professions Council Standards of Proficiency are then taken as a source of reflection to attempt to understand the perpetuation of medicalised perspectives in the profession and the potential friction between critical disability studies and music therapy. A selection of the Standards of Proficiency are analysed according to distinct paradigms of disability. Questions are posed to interrogate and contextualise the standards in relation to critical disability studies philosophy. From this critical reflection, a discussion emerges which reflects on the reach of these professional standards and how they might contribute to a continuing, outdated expert-model of music therapy in the United Kingdom. The article concludes by drawing these threads together in a series of recommendations to educators, practitioners and the wider profession.
对健康与护理专业委员会音乐治疗师能力标准的批判性反思:从批判性残疾研究的角度
本文从批判残疾研究的理论和哲学视角,批判性地反思卫生和护理专业委员会艺术治疗师的能力标准。批判性残疾研究学科由残疾研究和残疾人权利运动演变而来,最初是在引入多种残疾范式作为这些学科的核心原则之前定义的。批判性残疾研究与音乐治疗之间的关系被探讨,参考了开创性的出版物和其中对音乐治疗的看法。然后,健康和护理专业委员会的熟练程度标准被视为一个反思的来源,试图理解医学化观点在该行业的长期存在,以及批判性残疾研究和音乐治疗之间的潜在摩擦。根据不同的残疾模式,对一些能力标准进行了分析。提出问题是为了询问和情境化与批判性残疾研究哲学相关的标准。从这一批判性反思中,出现了一场讨论,反思了这些专业标准的适用范围,以及它们如何有助于英国持续的、过时的音乐治疗专家模式。文章最后将这些线索结合在一起,向教育工作者、从业者和更广泛的专业人士提出了一系列建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
42.90%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信