Manual and Oscillometric Blood Pressure in tPA‐Treated Acute Ischemic Stroke: What Constitutes Agreement?

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
M. Grove, Mani Paliwal, Anne Shearin, Jane Kaiser, Eun Sun Koo, Danielle Howey, M. Galati, Bozena Czekalski, Jennifer Dumawal, Briana DeCarvalho, Jackie Dwyer, G. Tsivgoulis, A. Alexandrov, A. Alexandrov
{"title":"Manual and Oscillometric Blood Pressure in tPA‐Treated Acute Ischemic Stroke: What Constitutes Agreement?","authors":"M. Grove, Mani Paliwal, Anne Shearin, Jane Kaiser, Eun Sun Koo, Danielle Howey, M. Galati, Bozena Czekalski, Jennifer Dumawal, Briana DeCarvalho, Jackie Dwyer, G. Tsivgoulis, A. Alexandrov, A. Alexandrov","doi":"10.1161/svin.122.000711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Automatic noninvasive oscillometric blood pressure (NIBP) devices measure mean arterial pressure (MAP); systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) are algorithmically derived from MAP. The most invalid NIBP measure is SBP, yet stroke practitioners use it to manage blood pressure (BP) in accordance with thrombolysis guidelines. We determined agreement between SBP, DBP, and MAP measured manually and by NIBP in patients treated with alteplase.\n \n \n \n A multisite prospective observational study of NIBP and manual BP agreement was conducted in patients treated with alteplase immediately after bolus and infusion initiation using methods established in guidelines for the assessment of device agreement. Dual auscultatory stethoscopes were used by 2 investigators to ensure agreement with each manual BP variable and MAP was calculated using the standard formula for manual BP measures. Data were analyzed using Bland–Altman analyses and Lin concordance correlation coefficient.\n \n \n \n A total of 7 hospitals participated, collecting 5 sets of manual/NIBP BPs in 95 patients treated with alteplase (475 paired measures). Range in limits of agreement were SBP: −28.91 to 21.41 mmHg with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.8; DBP: −21.0 to 19.0 mmHg with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.69; and MAP: −27.5 to 16.5 mmHg with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.7. There was no difference in device agreement by BP device manufacturer brand. Differences in SBP, DBP, and MAP between NIBP and manual sphygmomanometry failed to reach guideline recommendations requiring 80% of measures to fall within a 5 mmHg difference and 95% of measures to fall within a 10 mmHg difference.\n \n \n \n NIBP devices produce significantly different BP measures then manual sphygmomanometry auscultated BP. Because NIBP devices rely on the MAP and do not directly measure SBP and DBP, definition of what constitutes safe MAP boundaries in patients treated with alteplase should be determined when automatic BP measurement is used in clinical practice.\n","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.122.000711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automatic noninvasive oscillometric blood pressure (NIBP) devices measure mean arterial pressure (MAP); systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) are algorithmically derived from MAP. The most invalid NIBP measure is SBP, yet stroke practitioners use it to manage blood pressure (BP) in accordance with thrombolysis guidelines. We determined agreement between SBP, DBP, and MAP measured manually and by NIBP in patients treated with alteplase. A multisite prospective observational study of NIBP and manual BP agreement was conducted in patients treated with alteplase immediately after bolus and infusion initiation using methods established in guidelines for the assessment of device agreement. Dual auscultatory stethoscopes were used by 2 investigators to ensure agreement with each manual BP variable and MAP was calculated using the standard formula for manual BP measures. Data were analyzed using Bland–Altman analyses and Lin concordance correlation coefficient. A total of 7 hospitals participated, collecting 5 sets of manual/NIBP BPs in 95 patients treated with alteplase (475 paired measures). Range in limits of agreement were SBP: −28.91 to 21.41 mmHg with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.8; DBP: −21.0 to 19.0 mmHg with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.69; and MAP: −27.5 to 16.5 mmHg with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.7. There was no difference in device agreement by BP device manufacturer brand. Differences in SBP, DBP, and MAP between NIBP and manual sphygmomanometry failed to reach guideline recommendations requiring 80% of measures to fall within a 5 mmHg difference and 95% of measures to fall within a 10 mmHg difference. NIBP devices produce significantly different BP measures then manual sphygmomanometry auscultated BP. Because NIBP devices rely on the MAP and do not directly measure SBP and DBP, definition of what constitutes safe MAP boundaries in patients treated with alteplase should be determined when automatic BP measurement is used in clinical practice.
tPA治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的手动血压和示波血压:什么构成一致?
自动无创示波血压(NIBP)设备测量平均动脉压(MAP);收缩压和舒张压(SBP、DBP)在算法上从MAP导出。最无效的NIBP测量方法是SBP,但中风医生根据溶栓指南使用它来管理血压(BP)。我们确定了在阿替普酶治疗的患者中手动和NIBP测量的SBP、DBP和MAP之间的一致性。使用器械一致性评估指南中制定的方法,对阿替普酶治疗的患者在推注和输注后立即进行NIBP和手动BP一致性的多站点前瞻性观察研究。2名研究人员使用双听诊器,以确保与每个手动血压变量一致,并使用手动血压测量的标准公式计算MAP。使用Bland–Altman分析和Lin一致性相关系数对数据进行分析。共有7家医院参与,在95名接受阿替普酶治疗的患者中收集了5套手动/NIBP BP(475项配对测量)。一致性范围为收缩压:−28.91至21.41毫米汞柱,林的一致性相关系数为0.8;DBP:-21.0~19.0mmHg,林一致性相关系数0.69;MAP为−27.5~16.5mmHg,与Lin的一致性相关系数为0.7。BP设备制造商品牌的设备协议没有差异。NIBP和手动血压计之间SBP、DBP和MAP的差异未能达到指南建议,即80%的测量值在5毫米汞柱范围内,95%的测量值位于10毫米汞柱以内。NIBP设备产生的血压测量值与手动血压计听诊血压测量值明显不同。由于NIBP设备依赖MAP,不直接测量SBP和DBP,因此在临床实践中使用自动血压测量时,应确定阿替普酶治疗患者的安全MAP边界的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信