Tres controversias de la Ley n.º 19496 en un solo caso: la aplicabilidad a las micro o pequeñas empresas; la independencia de la acción infraccional de la acción indemnizatoria y el plazo de caducidad de la garantía legal

Q4 Social Sciences
E. R. Soto
{"title":"Tres controversias de la Ley n.º 19496 en un solo caso: la aplicabilidad a las micro o pequeñas empresas; la independencia de la acción infraccional de la acción indemnizatoria y el plazo de caducidad de la garantía legal","authors":"E. R. Soto","doi":"10.4067/S0718-80722020000200287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to exhibit three issues that have risen in Consumer Law as a result of the enforcement of Law No. 19,496 by our Courts of Justice. First, the enforcement of the protective statute by micro and small companies against their suppliers under the terms of Law No. 20,416. Second, the close dependency or autonomy between infringement liability and compensation, particularly under the hypotheses by which legal warranty operates. Lastly, the expiration period that characterizes the legal warranty as opposed to the general statute of limitations periods set forth in Article 26 of Law No. 19,496.","PeriodicalId":36265,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-80722020000200287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to exhibit three issues that have risen in Consumer Law as a result of the enforcement of Law No. 19,496 by our Courts of Justice. First, the enforcement of the protective statute by micro and small companies against their suppliers under the terms of Law No. 20,416. Second, the close dependency or autonomy between infringement liability and compensation, particularly under the hypotheses by which legal warranty operates. Lastly, the expiration period that characterizes the legal warranty as opposed to the general statute of limitations periods set forth in Article 26 of Law No. 19,496.
第19496号法律在一个案件中存在三个争议:适用于微型或小型企业;侵权行为与赔偿行为的独立性与法律保障的有效期
本文旨在展示由于我国法院执行第19496号法律而在《消费者法》中出现的三个问题。首先,根据第20416号法律的规定,微型和小型公司对其供应商实施保护性法规。第二,侵权责任和赔偿之间的密切依赖或自主权,特别是在法律担保运作的假设下。最后,与第19496号法律第26条规定的一般诉讼时效期限相比,法律担保的到期期限是其特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信