Commentary on Lifestyle Interventions Are Feasible in Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Potential Short-Term Health Benefits

S. Moug, A. Bryce, N. Mutrie, Annie S. Anderson
{"title":"Commentary on Lifestyle Interventions Are Feasible in Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Potential Short-Term Health Benefits","authors":"S. Moug, A. Bryce, N. Mutrie, Annie S. Anderson","doi":"10.4172/2471-9846.1000181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Lifestyle interventions have been proposed to improve cancer survivorship in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), but with treatment pathways becoming increasingly multi-modal and prolonged, opportunities for interventions may be limited. This systematic review assessed the evidence for the feasibility of performing lifestyle interventions in CRC patients and evaluated any short- and long-term health benefits. Methods Using PRISMA Guidelines, selected keywords identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of lifestyle interventions [smoking, alcohol, physical activity (PA) and diet/excess body weight] in CRC patients. These electronic databases were searched in June 2015: Dynamed, Cochrane Database, OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, and PEDro. Results Fourteen RCTs were identified: PA RCTs ( n = 10) consisted mainly of telephone-prompted walking or cycling interventions of varied durations, predominately in adjuvant setting; dietary/excess weight interventions RCTs ( n = 4) focused on low-fat and/or high-fibre diets within a multimodal lifestyle intervention. There were no reported RCTs in smoking or alcohol cessation/reduction. PA and/or die-tary/excess weight interventions reported variable recruitment rates, but good adherence and retention/follow-up rates, leading to short-term improvements in dietary quality, physical, psychological and quality-of-life parameters. Only one study assessed long-term follow-up, finding significantly improved cancer-specific survival after dietary intervention. Conclusions This is the first systematic review on lifestyle interventions in patients with CRC finding these interventions to be feasible with improvements in short-term health. Future work should focus on defining the optimal type of intervention (type, duration, timing and intensity) that not only leads to improved short-term outcomes but also assesses long-term survival. randomised factors, overall","PeriodicalId":92236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community & public health nursing","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2471-9846.1000181","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community & public health nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9846.1000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Lifestyle interventions have been proposed to improve cancer survivorship in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), but with treatment pathways becoming increasingly multi-modal and prolonged, opportunities for interventions may be limited. This systematic review assessed the evidence for the feasibility of performing lifestyle interventions in CRC patients and evaluated any short- and long-term health benefits. Methods Using PRISMA Guidelines, selected keywords identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of lifestyle interventions [smoking, alcohol, physical activity (PA) and diet/excess body weight] in CRC patients. These electronic databases were searched in June 2015: Dynamed, Cochrane Database, OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, and PEDro. Results Fourteen RCTs were identified: PA RCTs ( n = 10) consisted mainly of telephone-prompted walking or cycling interventions of varied durations, predominately in adjuvant setting; dietary/excess weight interventions RCTs ( n = 4) focused on low-fat and/or high-fibre diets within a multimodal lifestyle intervention. There were no reported RCTs in smoking or alcohol cessation/reduction. PA and/or die-tary/excess weight interventions reported variable recruitment rates, but good adherence and retention/follow-up rates, leading to short-term improvements in dietary quality, physical, psychological and quality-of-life parameters. Only one study assessed long-term follow-up, finding significantly improved cancer-specific survival after dietary intervention. Conclusions This is the first systematic review on lifestyle interventions in patients with CRC finding these interventions to be feasible with improvements in short-term health. Future work should focus on defining the optimal type of intervention (type, duration, timing and intensity) that not only leads to improved short-term outcomes but also assesses long-term survival. randomised factors, overall
生活方式干预对癌症大肠癌患者可行的评论,具有潜在的短期健康益处
目的已提出生活方式干预措施来提高癌症(CRC)患者的癌症生存率,但随着治疗途径日益多样化和延长,干预的机会可能有限。这项系统综述评估了对CRC患者进行生活方式干预的可行性证据,并评估了任何短期和长期健康益处。方法使用PRISMA指南,选定的关键词确定了CRC患者生活方式干预[吸烟、饮酒、体育活动(PA)和饮食/超重]的随机对照研究(RCT)。这些电子数据库于2015年6月检索:Dynamed、Cochrane数据库、OVID MEDLINE、OVID EMBASE和PEDro。结果确定了14项随机对照试验:PA随机对照试验(n=10)主要包括不同持续时间的电话提示步行或骑自行车干预,主要在辅助环境中;饮食/超重干预随机对照试验(n=4)侧重于多模式生活方式干预中的低脂和/或高纤维饮食。没有关于戒烟或减少饮酒的随机对照试验报告。PA和/或死亡/超重干预报告称,招募率可变,但依从性和保留/随访率良好,导致饮食质量、身体、心理和生活质量参数的短期改善。只有一项研究评估了长期随访,发现饮食干预后癌症特异性生存率显著提高。结论这是首次对CRC患者的生活方式干预进行系统综述,发现这些干预措施在改善短期健康方面是可行的。未来的工作应侧重于确定最佳干预类型(类型、持续时间、时间和强度),不仅能改善短期结果,还能评估长期生存率。随机因素,总体
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信