Connection and hope in a post-pandemic world?

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
G. Kirwan, A. Whittaker
{"title":"Connection and hope in a post-pandemic world?","authors":"G. Kirwan, A. Whittaker","doi":"10.1080/02650533.2022.2033010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the last issue, the discovery of a new and highly contagious Omicron variant of COVID-19 has led to renewed concern and frustrated hopes of a return to ‘ordinary’ (or pre-pandemic) life. Indeed, debates are increasingly focusing upon whether a return to a pre-pandemic world is possible and whether COVID will enter into a new phase as an endemic illness that we learn to live with, like flu. The enduring issue is how we manage hope in the vicissitudes of a pandemic that has created, for many people, a sense of pervasive anxiety in the face of ongoing uncertainty. Our first article of 2022 invites us to think beyond the present Covid-19 situation and into the possibilities of social work renewal in a post-pandemic world. In their article titled ‘Social work and child protection for a post-pandemic world: the remaking of practice during COVID-19 and its renewal beyond it’, the three authors, Harry Ferguson, Laura Kelly and Sarah Pink, present findings from a longitudinal study of social workers, managers and family support workers based across four local authority areas in England. Their study findings reveal many dimensions of practice, including the changes that have occurred as a result of Covid-19 restrictions, social distancing in particular. Their study illustrates examples of the increased bureaucratisation of practice in child protection services and it shines a light on how the Covid-19 crisis, which they refer to as ‘a moment of dramatic disruption’, has amplified the challenges social workers encounter in trying to fulfil regulatory and administrative requirements whilst simultaneously ensuring sufficient direct contact with service users. The study shines a light on the creativity, skills and determination of practitioners and managers to persevere with their work despite the challenges which exist within the current pandemic context. The second article in this issue, ‘Sharing Lived Experiences Framework (SLEF): a framework for mental health practitioners when making disclosure decisions’ by Brendan J. Dunlop, Bethany Woods, Jonny Lovell, Alison O’Connell, Sally RawcliffeFoo and Kerry Hinsby, addresses the issue of self-disclosure by practitioners. The SLEF framework, which the authors set out in this article, highlights the role that supervision and reflective practice can play in helping individual practitioners to make decisions about when and to what extent self-disclosure is useful or appropriate in their work. The framework is designed to assist practitioners in their decision-making about self-disclosure, and it details a range of factors that surround such decisions. Tom Casey’s article details a practice model which aims to interpret and work with the relational dynamics that can occur within the relationships that surround children in care. The article, titled ‘The evolving use of Mentalization informed thinking with the “Care Team” in the Irish statutory child protection system’, examines the usefulness of JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE 2022, VOL. 36, NO. 1, 1–3 https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2033010","PeriodicalId":46754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work Practice","volume":"36 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2033010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the last issue, the discovery of a new and highly contagious Omicron variant of COVID-19 has led to renewed concern and frustrated hopes of a return to ‘ordinary’ (or pre-pandemic) life. Indeed, debates are increasingly focusing upon whether a return to a pre-pandemic world is possible and whether COVID will enter into a new phase as an endemic illness that we learn to live with, like flu. The enduring issue is how we manage hope in the vicissitudes of a pandemic that has created, for many people, a sense of pervasive anxiety in the face of ongoing uncertainty. Our first article of 2022 invites us to think beyond the present Covid-19 situation and into the possibilities of social work renewal in a post-pandemic world. In their article titled ‘Social work and child protection for a post-pandemic world: the remaking of practice during COVID-19 and its renewal beyond it’, the three authors, Harry Ferguson, Laura Kelly and Sarah Pink, present findings from a longitudinal study of social workers, managers and family support workers based across four local authority areas in England. Their study findings reveal many dimensions of practice, including the changes that have occurred as a result of Covid-19 restrictions, social distancing in particular. Their study illustrates examples of the increased bureaucratisation of practice in child protection services and it shines a light on how the Covid-19 crisis, which they refer to as ‘a moment of dramatic disruption’, has amplified the challenges social workers encounter in trying to fulfil regulatory and administrative requirements whilst simultaneously ensuring sufficient direct contact with service users. The study shines a light on the creativity, skills and determination of practitioners and managers to persevere with their work despite the challenges which exist within the current pandemic context. The second article in this issue, ‘Sharing Lived Experiences Framework (SLEF): a framework for mental health practitioners when making disclosure decisions’ by Brendan J. Dunlop, Bethany Woods, Jonny Lovell, Alison O’Connell, Sally RawcliffeFoo and Kerry Hinsby, addresses the issue of self-disclosure by practitioners. The SLEF framework, which the authors set out in this article, highlights the role that supervision and reflective practice can play in helping individual practitioners to make decisions about when and to what extent self-disclosure is useful or appropriate in their work. The framework is designed to assist practitioners in their decision-making about self-disclosure, and it details a range of factors that surround such decisions. Tom Casey’s article details a practice model which aims to interpret and work with the relational dynamics that can occur within the relationships that surround children in care. The article, titled ‘The evolving use of Mentalization informed thinking with the “Care Team” in the Irish statutory child protection system’, examines the usefulness of JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE 2022, VOL. 36, NO. 1, 1–3 https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2033010
疫情后世界的联系和希望?
自上一期以来,发现了一种新的高传染性的COVID-19欧米克隆变体,这让人们重新感到担忧,也让人们对回归“普通”(或大流行前)生活的希望落空。事实上,越来越多的争论集中在是否有可能回到大流行前的世界,以及COVID是否会像流感一样,作为一种我们学会忍受的地方病进入一个新的阶段。持久的问题是,面对持续的不确定性,我们如何在大流行的沧桑中管理希望,这一流行病使许多人产生了普遍的焦虑感。我们2022年的第一篇文章邀请我们超越当前的Covid-19形势,思考大流行后世界中社会工作更新的可能性。在题为《大流行后世界的社会工作和儿童保护:COVID-19期间实践的重塑及其更新》的文章中,三位作者哈里·弗格森、劳拉·凯利和萨拉·平克介绍了对英格兰四个地方当局地区的社会工作者、管理人员和家庭支持工作者进行的纵向研究的结果。他们的研究结果揭示了实践的许多方面,包括由于Covid-19限制,特别是社交距离而发生的变化。他们的研究展示了儿童保护服务实践日益官僚化的例子,并揭示了他们称之为“戏剧性中断时刻”的Covid-19危机如何放大了社会工作者在努力满足监管和行政要求的同时确保与服务用户充分直接接触时遇到的挑战。这项研究揭示了从业人员和管理人员的创造力、技能和决心,尽管在当前大流行的背景下存在挑战,但他们仍坚持工作。这期的第二篇文章,“分享生活经验框架(SLEF):心理健康从业者在做出披露决定时的框架”,作者是Brendan J. Dunlop, Bethany Woods, Jonny Lovell, Alison O ' connell, Sally rawcliffoo和Kerry Hinsby,讨论了从业者自我披露的问题。作者在本文中提出的SLEF框架强调了监督和反思实践在帮助个体从业者决定何时以及在何种程度上自我披露在他们的工作中是有用的或适当的方面可以发挥的作用。该框架旨在帮助从业者做出关于自我披露的决策,并详细说明了围绕这些决策的一系列因素。Tom Casey的文章详细介绍了一个实践模型,该模型旨在解释和处理在照顾儿童的关系中可能发生的关系动态。这篇文章题为“在爱尔兰法定儿童保护制度中,与“护理团队”一起不断发展的心智化知情思维”,研究了《社会工作实践杂志》2022年第36卷的有用性。1,1 - 3 https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2033010
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work Practice publishes high quality refereed articles devoted to the exploration and analysis of practice in social welfare and allied health professions from psychodynamic and systemic perspectives. This includes counselling, social care planning, education and training, research, institutional life, management and organisation or policy-making. Articles are also welcome that critically examine the psychodynamic tradition in the light of other theoretical orientations or explanatory systems. The Journal of Social Work Practice is committed to a policy of equal opportunities and actively strives to foster all forms of intercultural dialogue and debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信