{"title":"Poe's Last Jest: The Magazine Prison-House, Colonial Exploitation, and Revenge in \"Hop-Frog\"","authors":"John Gruesser","doi":"10.5325/edgallpoerev.24.1.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article looks at Edgar Allan Poe's \"Hop-Frog\" in connection with revenge, one of the oldest and richest themes in literature. As the author has done in connection with \"The Cask of Amontillado,\" this article offers a generalized biographical interpretation of this 1849 story, linking it to Poe's February 1845 essay \"Some Secrets of the Magazine Prison-House\" with its emphasis on \"fat,\" exploitive \"editors and proprietors,\" as well as his September 1845 \"Marginalia\" piece about the sorry state of the American publishing industry. Contending that the story must be read vis-à-vis not only enslavement and slave rebellion, as several critics have done, but also colonization, this article casts doubt on claims that Poe used the tale to settle scores with personal enemies or to revenge himself on the reading public. A brief coda argues that in \"Hop-Frog\" Poe does not simply avenge himself on those responsible both for his own exploitation as \"a poor devil author\" and the colonization of American literature generally. Rather, he counterbalances the gruesome, fiery climax with a celebratory compendium of many of his greatest hits through allusions to at least eleven of his writings published between 1835 and 1846.","PeriodicalId":40986,"journal":{"name":"Edgar Allan Poe Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"21 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edgar Allan Poe Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/edgallpoerev.24.1.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:This article looks at Edgar Allan Poe's "Hop-Frog" in connection with revenge, one of the oldest and richest themes in literature. As the author has done in connection with "The Cask of Amontillado," this article offers a generalized biographical interpretation of this 1849 story, linking it to Poe's February 1845 essay "Some Secrets of the Magazine Prison-House" with its emphasis on "fat," exploitive "editors and proprietors," as well as his September 1845 "Marginalia" piece about the sorry state of the American publishing industry. Contending that the story must be read vis-à-vis not only enslavement and slave rebellion, as several critics have done, but also colonization, this article casts doubt on claims that Poe used the tale to settle scores with personal enemies or to revenge himself on the reading public. A brief coda argues that in "Hop-Frog" Poe does not simply avenge himself on those responsible both for his own exploitation as "a poor devil author" and the colonization of American literature generally. Rather, he counterbalances the gruesome, fiery climax with a celebratory compendium of many of his greatest hits through allusions to at least eleven of his writings published between 1835 and 1846.
摘要:本文将爱伦·坡的《跳蛙》与复仇联系起来,复仇是文学史上最古老、最丰富的主题之一。正如作者在《阿蒙提拉多的木桶》中所做的那样,本文对这个1849年的故事进行了概括的传记解读,将其与坡1845年2月的文章《监狱之家杂志的一些秘密》(Some Secrets of the Magazine Prison House)联系起来,该文章强调“肥胖的、剥削性的”编辑和所有者,以及他1845年9月关于美国出版业糟糕状况的文章《边缘》(Marginalia)。这篇文章认为,这个故事不仅要像一些评论家所做的那样,与奴役和奴隶叛乱作对照,还要与殖民作对照,这让人们对爱伦·坡利用这个故事与个人敌人算账或向读者复仇的说法产生了怀疑。一个简短的结尾部分认为,在《跳蛙》中,坡并没有简单地向那些对他作为“一个可怜的魔鬼作家”的剥削和美国文学的殖民化负有责任的人复仇。相反,他通过引用他在1835年至1846年间出版的至少11部作品,用一本庆祝他的许多最伟大作品的简编来平衡这一可怕而激烈的高潮。
期刊介绍:
The Edgar Allan Poe Review publishes scholarly essays on and creative responses to Edgar Allan Poe, his life, works, and influence and provides a forum for the informal exchange of information on Poe-related events.