Politinių skandalų dinamika mediatizuotoje Lietuvos viešojoje erdvėje

Q3 Engineering
Austėja Masiokaitė-Liubinienė
{"title":"Politinių skandalų dinamika mediatizuotoje Lietuvos viešojoje erdvėje","authors":"Austėja Masiokaitė-Liubinienė","doi":"10.15388/IM.2018.82.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English] \nThe concept of mediatization, which analyzes how the dominance of media shapes political processes, is becoming continuously more relevant as a more important role is being assigned to the media in the public sphere. Despite the relevance, there are not many defined methods of analysis of political mediatization. This article presents such a method, which is designed for analyzing political scandals. This method adopts the concept of mediatization as a metatheory and uses the Veto Players theory to structure the political sphere and scandals in a way that allows for their analysis. \nA qualitative content analysis of three cases of Lithuanian political scandals, based on this method, is also presented. \nIn the discussed cases, the interaction between the political and media actors appears to be very close and mutual. Not only do politicians take the initiative in asking for the political responsibility of the actors in the scandalous situations that the media reveal, but they also initiate the distribution of such information to the media, seeking the desired change of the status quo or the legitimization of their decisions. This provides means for talking about the self-mediatization of political actors.","PeriodicalId":37230,"journal":{"name":"Informacijos Mokslai","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacijos Mokslai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/IM.2018.82.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English] The concept of mediatization, which analyzes how the dominance of media shapes political processes, is becoming continuously more relevant as a more important role is being assigned to the media in the public sphere. Despite the relevance, there are not many defined methods of analysis of political mediatization. This article presents such a method, which is designed for analyzing political scandals. This method adopts the concept of mediatization as a metatheory and uses the Veto Players theory to structure the political sphere and scandals in a way that allows for their analysis. A qualitative content analysis of three cases of Lithuanian political scandals, based on this method, is also presented. In the discussed cases, the interaction between the political and media actors appears to be very close and mutual. Not only do politicians take the initiative in asking for the political responsibility of the actors in the scandalous situations that the media reveal, but they also initiate the distribution of such information to the media, seeking the desired change of the status quo or the legitimization of their decisions. This provides means for talking about the self-mediatization of political actors.
立陶宛调解公共空间的政治丑闻动态
[立陶宛文全文和摘要;英文摘要]调解的概念分析了媒体的主导地位如何塑造政治进程,随着媒体在公共领域发挥更重要的作用,调解的概念变得越来越重要。尽管具有相关性,但对政治调解的分析并没有很多明确的方法。本文提出了一种分析政治丑闻的方法。这种方法采用了中介化的概念作为一种元理论,并使用Veto Players理论来构建政治领域和丑闻,使其能够进行分析。基于此方法,还对立陶宛三起政治丑闻案件进行了定性内容分析。在所讨论的案例中,政治和媒体行为者之间的互动似乎非常密切和相互。政客们不仅在媒体揭露的丑闻中主动要求行为者承担政治责任,而且还主动向媒体分发此类信息,寻求改变现状或使其决定合法化。这为讨论政治行动者的自我调解提供了手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Informacijos Mokslai
Informacijos Mokslai Engineering-Media Technology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信