Preemptive analgesia with wound infiltration using bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine alone for postoperative analgesia in abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective randomized analytical study

Priyanka Shelwatkar, Sujit Kshirsagar, P. Bhalerao
{"title":"Preemptive analgesia with wound infiltration using bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine alone for postoperative analgesia in abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective randomized analytical study","authors":"Priyanka Shelwatkar, Sujit Kshirsagar, P. Bhalerao","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_47_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The administration of local anesthetics into the wound before the incision (preemptive analgesia) has been demonstrated to reduce postoperative pain. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the quality of postoperative analgesia in abdominal hysterectomy by visual analog scale (VAS) in the group of 0.125% bupivacaine 15 ml with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and in the group of 0.125% bupivacaine 15 ml alone. Settings and Design: A prospective observational analytical study was conducted in a tertiary care government hospital including 80 patients undergoing hysterectomy divided into two groups of 40 each. Subjects and Methods: Group A included those patients who received 0.125% bupivacaine 15 ml with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and Group B patients received bupivacaine 15 ml alone. The pain was assessed by VAS. Rescue analgesia was given with diclofenac sodium 75 mg intramuscular on demand or whenever the VAS score was ≥4. The level of sedation was assessed using the four-point Sedation Scale. Nausea and vomiting were assessed by four-point categorical scales. Statistical Analysis: Mean and standard deviation were used to depict quantitative data, and paired t-test was used to compare the groups. Results: The combination of bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine has a better and longer anesthetic effect than bupivacaine alone (P < 0.001). The total diclofenac consumption in Group A was less (95.63 [±33.92] mg) than in Group B (150 [±0.0] mg), P < 0.01. Group A rescue analgesia was required after 2 h in only one (2.5%) patient, whereas in Group B, rescue analgesia was required immediately at 0 h in six (15%) patients (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The duration of analgesia was longer, and number of doses of rescue analgesia during the first 24 h after operation was significantly less in the group who received bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine when compared with bupivacaine alone.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"36 1","pages":"147 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_47_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The administration of local anesthetics into the wound before the incision (preemptive analgesia) has been demonstrated to reduce postoperative pain. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the quality of postoperative analgesia in abdominal hysterectomy by visual analog scale (VAS) in the group of 0.125% bupivacaine 15 ml with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and in the group of 0.125% bupivacaine 15 ml alone. Settings and Design: A prospective observational analytical study was conducted in a tertiary care government hospital including 80 patients undergoing hysterectomy divided into two groups of 40 each. Subjects and Methods: Group A included those patients who received 0.125% bupivacaine 15 ml with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and Group B patients received bupivacaine 15 ml alone. The pain was assessed by VAS. Rescue analgesia was given with diclofenac sodium 75 mg intramuscular on demand or whenever the VAS score was ≥4. The level of sedation was assessed using the four-point Sedation Scale. Nausea and vomiting were assessed by four-point categorical scales. Statistical Analysis: Mean and standard deviation were used to depict quantitative data, and paired t-test was used to compare the groups. Results: The combination of bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine has a better and longer anesthetic effect than bupivacaine alone (P < 0.001). The total diclofenac consumption in Group A was less (95.63 [±33.92] mg) than in Group B (150 [±0.0] mg), P < 0.01. Group A rescue analgesia was required after 2 h in only one (2.5%) patient, whereas in Group B, rescue analgesia was required immediately at 0 h in six (15%) patients (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The duration of analgesia was longer, and number of doses of rescue analgesia during the first 24 h after operation was significantly less in the group who received bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine when compared with bupivacaine alone.
布比卡因联合右美托咪定和单独布比卡因用于腹式子宫切除术术后预防性伤口浸润镇痛:一项前瞻性随机分析研究
背景:在切口前将局麻药注入伤口(先发制人的镇痛)已被证明可以减少术后疼痛。目的:采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价0.125%布比卡因15 ml联合右美托咪定1 μg/kg组和0.125%布比卡因15 ml单用组腹部子宫切除术术后镇痛质量。背景与设计:在一家三级政府医院进行了一项前瞻性观察性分析研究,将80例子宫切除术患者分为两组,每组40例。对象与方法:A组患者采用0.125%布比卡因15 ml联合右美托咪定1 μg/kg, B组患者单独使用布比卡因15 ml。采用VAS评估疼痛程度。根据需要或VAS评分≥4分时给予双氯芬酸钠75 mg肌内镇痛。采用镇静四级评分法评估镇静水平。恶心和呕吐用4分分类量表进行评估。统计分析:定量资料采用均数和标准差描述,组间比较采用配对t检验。结果:布比卡因与右美托咪定合用麻醉效果优于布比卡因单用麻醉效果(P < 0.001)。A组患者双氯芬酸总用量(95.63[±33.92]mg)低于B组(150[±0.0]mg), P < 0.01。A组只有1例(2.5%)患者需要在2 h后立即镇痛,而B组有6例(15%)患者在0 h后立即镇痛(P < 0.001)。结论:与单用布比卡因组相比,布比卡因联合右美托咪定组镇痛持续时间更长,术后前24 h抢救镇痛剂量明显减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信