Social acceptance of green hydrogen in Germany: building trust through responsible innovation

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Johann Jakob Häußermann, Moritz J. Maier, Thea C. Kirsch, Simone Kaiser, Martina Schraudner
{"title":"Social acceptance of green hydrogen in Germany: building trust through responsible innovation","authors":"Johann Jakob Häußermann,&nbsp;Moritz J. Maier,&nbsp;Thea C. Kirsch,&nbsp;Simone Kaiser,&nbsp;Martina Schraudner","doi":"10.1186/s13705-023-00394-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Social acceptance presents a major challenge for Germany’s transition to green energy. As a power-to-x technology, green hydrogen is set to become a key component of a future sustainable energy system. With a view to averting conflicts like those surrounding wind energy, we have investigated social acceptance of green hydrogen at an early stage in its implementation, before wider rollout. Our study uses a mixed-method approach, wherein semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 24) and two participatory workshops (<i>n</i> = 51) in a selected region in central Germany serve alongside a representative survey (<i>n</i> = 2054) as the basis for both understanding social attitudes and reaching generalisable conclusions.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, it is possible to observe both a marked lack of knowledge and a large degree of openness towards green hydrogen and its local use, along with high expectations regarding environmental and climate protection. We reach three key conclusions. First, acceptance of green hydrogen relies on trust in science, government, the media, and institutions that uphold distributive justice, with consideration for regional values playing a vital role in establishing said trust. Second, methodologically sound participatory processes can promote acceptance, and active support in particular. Third, recurrent positive participatory experiences can effectively foster trust.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Accordingly, we argue that trust should be strengthened on a structural level, and that green hydrogen acceptance should be understood as a matter of responsible innovation. As the first empirical investigation into social acceptance of green hydrogen, and by conceptually interlinking acceptance research and responsible innovation, this study constitutes an important contribution to existing research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":539,"journal":{"name":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13705-023-00394-4","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-023-00394-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Social acceptance presents a major challenge for Germany’s transition to green energy. As a power-to-x technology, green hydrogen is set to become a key component of a future sustainable energy system. With a view to averting conflicts like those surrounding wind energy, we have investigated social acceptance of green hydrogen at an early stage in its implementation, before wider rollout. Our study uses a mixed-method approach, wherein semi-structured interviews (n = 24) and two participatory workshops (n = 51) in a selected region in central Germany serve alongside a representative survey (n = 2054) as the basis for both understanding social attitudes and reaching generalisable conclusions.

Results

Overall, it is possible to observe both a marked lack of knowledge and a large degree of openness towards green hydrogen and its local use, along with high expectations regarding environmental and climate protection. We reach three key conclusions. First, acceptance of green hydrogen relies on trust in science, government, the media, and institutions that uphold distributive justice, with consideration for regional values playing a vital role in establishing said trust. Second, methodologically sound participatory processes can promote acceptance, and active support in particular. Third, recurrent positive participatory experiences can effectively foster trust.

Conclusions

Accordingly, we argue that trust should be strengthened on a structural level, and that green hydrogen acceptance should be understood as a matter of responsible innovation. As the first empirical investigation into social acceptance of green hydrogen, and by conceptually interlinking acceptance research and responsible innovation, this study constitutes an important contribution to existing research.

德国社会对绿色氢的接受度:通过负责任的创新建立信任
社会接受度是德国向绿色能源转型的一个主要挑战。作为一种电力到x的技术,绿色氢将成为未来可持续能源系统的关键组成部分。为了避免像风能那样的冲突,我们在绿色氢的早期实施阶段,在更广泛的推广之前,调查了社会对绿色氢的接受程度。我们的研究采用混合方法,其中半结构化访谈(n = 24)和两个参与式研讨会(n = 51)在德国中部的一个选定地区与代表性调查(n = 2054)一起作为理解社会态度和得出一般性结论的基础。结果总的来说,我们可以观察到对绿色氢及其在当地的使用明显缺乏知识和很大程度上的开放,以及对环境和气候保护的高期望。我们得出了三个关键结论。首先,接受绿色氢依赖于对科学、政府、媒体和维护分配正义的机构的信任,考虑到区域价值在建立这种信任方面发挥着至关重要的作用。第二,方法上合理的参与性进程可以促进接受,特别是积极的支持。第三,经常性的积极参与性体验可以有效地培养信任。因此,我们认为应该在结构层面上加强信任,并且应该将绿色氢的接受理解为负责任的创新。本研究首次对绿色氢的社会接受度进行实证研究,并将接受度研究与负责任创新在概念上联系起来,是对现有研究的重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy, Sustainability and Society
Energy, Sustainability and Society Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy, Sustainability and Society is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. It covers topics ranging from scientific research to innovative approaches for technology implementation to analysis of economic, social and environmental impacts of sustainable energy systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信