Photo-Elicitation Interviews—a Possibility for Collaborative Provocation of Preconceptions

Q3 Social Sciences
Å. Birkeland, Liv Torunn Grindheim
{"title":"Photo-Elicitation Interviews—a Possibility for Collaborative Provocation of Preconceptions","authors":"Å. Birkeland, Liv Torunn Grindheim","doi":"10.1163/23644583-bja10026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article investigates researchers’ methodological preconceptions when aiming at insight by involving visual methods in focus group interviews. The authors examine the photos used in photo-elicited focus group interviews in a project investigating Chinese and Norwegian early childhood education master students and teacher educators’ values and beliefs about proper artifacts for local and national belonging. They aim to adopt a “defamiliarizing mode” for their interpretations while emphasizing conflicting perspectives among the interviewees using provocative photos to prompt the discussion. To critically investigate the photos and problematize the authors’ choices of photos that reflect their preconceptions, this article is structured around the research question: how can photo-elicited interviews (pei) provoke researchers’ methodological preconceptions? The conflicting perspectives were analyzed building on Bakhtin’s concepts on outsideness, chronotope and polyphony. The authors’ analysis surfaces new insight into the limitations and strengths of photo-elicited focus group interviews contextualized in educational research.","PeriodicalId":31797,"journal":{"name":"Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23644583-bja10026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article investigates researchers’ methodological preconceptions when aiming at insight by involving visual methods in focus group interviews. The authors examine the photos used in photo-elicited focus group interviews in a project investigating Chinese and Norwegian early childhood education master students and teacher educators’ values and beliefs about proper artifacts for local and national belonging. They aim to adopt a “defamiliarizing mode” for their interpretations while emphasizing conflicting perspectives among the interviewees using provocative photos to prompt the discussion. To critically investigate the photos and problematize the authors’ choices of photos that reflect their preconceptions, this article is structured around the research question: how can photo-elicited interviews (pei) provoke researchers’ methodological preconceptions? The conflicting perspectives were analyzed building on Bakhtin’s concepts on outsideness, chronotope and polyphony. The authors’ analysis surfaces new insight into the limitations and strengths of photo-elicited focus group interviews contextualized in educational research.
照片启发访谈-一种协同激发先入为主观念的可能性
本文调查了研究人员的方法先入为主时,目的是洞察涉及视觉方法的焦点小组访谈。在一个调查中国和挪威早期儿童教育硕士学生和教师教育工作者关于地方和国家归属的适当文物的价值观和信念的项目中,作者检查了照片引发的焦点小组访谈中使用的照片。他们的目的是采用一种“陌生感”的解释方式,同时强调受访者之间的冲突观点,用挑衅性的照片来引发讨论。为了批判性地调查这些照片,并对作者选择反映他们先入为主观念的照片提出问题,本文围绕研究问题进行了架构:照片引出的访谈(pei)如何引发研究人员的方法论先入为主观念?从巴赫金的外在性、时位和复调的概念出发,分析了这些矛盾的观点。作者的分析揭示了在教育研究背景下,照片引发的焦点小组访谈的局限性和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy
Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书