The Role of Accounting Conservatism in Moderating the Determinants of Earning Quality

E. Cahyani, Muhammad Khafid
{"title":"The Role of Accounting Conservatism in Moderating the Determinants of Earning Quality","authors":"E. Cahyani, Muhammad Khafid","doi":"10.15294/jda.v12i1.24482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of liquidity, profit growth, firm size, and board of commissioners on the quality of earnings with conservatism as a moderating variable. The population of this study was the manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2018. Sampling of the research used purposive sampling method has obtained 59 sample companies with 4 years of observation so that 239 units of analysis were obtained. The total unit of analysis was reduced by 103 outlier data, so that the data used became 133 data. The analysis techniques used in the research were descriptive statistical analysis technique and inferential regression analysis with moderating variable. The results show that liquidity, profit growth, and the board of commissioners have no effect on the quality of earnings. Meanwhile, accounting conservatism does not moderate the effect of liquidity and firm size on earnings quality. The failure of accounting conservatism as the moderating variable in this research model is interesting to be carried out by the further research by developing the appropriate conservatism measurement according to the characteristics of manufacturing companies.","PeriodicalId":30817,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi","volume":"12 1","pages":"46-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v12i1.24482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of liquidity, profit growth, firm size, and board of commissioners on the quality of earnings with conservatism as a moderating variable. The population of this study was the manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2018. Sampling of the research used purposive sampling method has obtained 59 sample companies with 4 years of observation so that 239 units of analysis were obtained. The total unit of analysis was reduced by 103 outlier data, so that the data used became 133 data. The analysis techniques used in the research were descriptive statistical analysis technique and inferential regression analysis with moderating variable. The results show that liquidity, profit growth, and the board of commissioners have no effect on the quality of earnings. Meanwhile, accounting conservatism does not moderate the effect of liquidity and firm size on earnings quality. The failure of accounting conservatism as the moderating variable in this research model is interesting to be carried out by the further research by developing the appropriate conservatism measurement according to the characteristics of manufacturing companies.
会计稳健性在调节盈余质量决定因素中的作用
本研究的目的是考察流动性、利润增长、公司规模和董事会对收益质量的影响,保守主义是一个调节变量。本研究的对象是2015-2018年在印度尼西亚证券交易所上市的制造业公司。本研究采用有针对性的抽样方法对59家样本公司进行了4年的观察,从而获得239个分析单位。分析的总单位减少了103个异常数据,因此使用的数据变成了133个数据。研究中采用的分析技术有描述性统计分析技术和带调节变量的推断回归分析技术。结果表明,流动性、利润增长和董事会对收益质量没有影响。同时,会计稳健性并不能缓和流动性和公司规模对盈余质量的影响。在该研究模型中,会计稳健性作为调节变量的失败值得进一步研究,根据制造企业的特点制定适当的稳健性计量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书