Minimization of errors in discrete wavelet filtering of signals during ultrasonic measurements and testing

IF 0.1 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Y. Taranenko, R. Mygushchenko, O. Kropachek, G. Suchkov, Yu. O. Plesnetsov
{"title":"Minimization of errors in discrete wavelet filtering of signals during ultrasonic measurements and testing","authors":"Y. Taranenko, R. Mygushchenko, O. Kropachek, G. Suchkov, Yu. O. Plesnetsov","doi":"10.24027/2306-7039.4.2021.250433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Error minimizing methods for discrete wavelet filtering of ultrasonic meter signals are considered. For this purpose, special model signals containing various measuring pulses are generated. The psi function of the Daubechies 28 wavelet is used to generate the pulses. Noise is added to the generated pulses. A comparative analysis of the two filtering algorithms is performed. The first algorithm is to limit the amount of detail of the wavelet decomposition coefficients in relation to signal interference. The minimum value of the root mean square error of wavelet decomposition signal deviation which is restored at each level from the initial signal without noise is determined. The second algorithm uses a separate threshold for each level of wavelet decomposition to limit the magnitude of the detail coefficients that are proportional to the standard deviation. Like in the first algorithm, the task is to determine the level of wavelet decomposition at which the minimum standard error is achieved. A feature of both algorithms is an expanded base of discrete wavelets ‒ families of Biorthogonal, Coiflet, Daubechies, Discrete Meyer, Haar, Reverse Biorthogonal, Symlets (106 in total) and threshold functions garotte, garrote, greater, hard, less, soft (6 in total). The model function uses random variables in both algorithms, so the averaging base is used to obtain stable results. Given features of algorithm construction allowed to reveal efficiency of ultrasonic signal filtering on the first algorithm presented in the form of oscilloscopic images. The use of a separate threshold for limiting the number of detail coefficients for each level of discrete wavelet decomposition using the given wavelet base and threshold functions has reduced the filtering error.","PeriodicalId":40775,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24027/2306-7039.4.2021.250433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Error minimizing methods for discrete wavelet filtering of ultrasonic meter signals are considered. For this purpose, special model signals containing various measuring pulses are generated. The psi function of the Daubechies 28 wavelet is used to generate the pulses. Noise is added to the generated pulses. A comparative analysis of the two filtering algorithms is performed. The first algorithm is to limit the amount of detail of the wavelet decomposition coefficients in relation to signal interference. The minimum value of the root mean square error of wavelet decomposition signal deviation which is restored at each level from the initial signal without noise is determined. The second algorithm uses a separate threshold for each level of wavelet decomposition to limit the magnitude of the detail coefficients that are proportional to the standard deviation. Like in the first algorithm, the task is to determine the level of wavelet decomposition at which the minimum standard error is achieved. A feature of both algorithms is an expanded base of discrete wavelets ‒ families of Biorthogonal, Coiflet, Daubechies, Discrete Meyer, Haar, Reverse Biorthogonal, Symlets (106 in total) and threshold functions garotte, garrote, greater, hard, less, soft (6 in total). The model function uses random variables in both algorithms, so the averaging base is used to obtain stable results. Given features of algorithm construction allowed to reveal efficiency of ultrasonic signal filtering on the first algorithm presented in the form of oscilloscopic images. The use of a separate threshold for limiting the number of detail coefficients for each level of discrete wavelet decomposition using the given wavelet base and threshold functions has reduced the filtering error.
超声波测量和测试过程中信号离散小波滤波误差的最小化
考虑了超声波流量计信号离散小波滤波的误差最小化方法。为此,产生包含各种测量脉冲的特殊模型信号。Daubechies 28小波的psi函数用于生成脉冲。噪声被添加到生成的脉冲中。对两种滤波算法进行了比较分析。第一种算法是限制与信号干扰相关的小波分解系数的细节量。确定从没有噪声的初始信号在每个级别恢复的小波分解信号偏差的均方根误差的最小值。第二种算法对每个级别的小波分解使用单独的阈值来限制与标准偏差成比例的细节系数的大小。与第一种算法一样,任务是确定实现最小标准误差的小波分解级别。这两种算法的一个特点是离散小波的扩展基础——双正交、Coiflet、Daubechies、discrete Meyer、Haar、反向双正交、Symlets(共106个)和阈值函数garotte、garrote、great、hard、less、soft(共6个)。模型函数在两种算法中都使用了随机变量,因此使用平均基数来获得稳定的结果。给定算法构造的特征,可以揭示超声信号滤波对以示波器图像形式呈现的第一种算法的效率。使用单独的阈值来限制使用给定的小波基和阈值函数的离散小波分解的每个级别的细节系数的数量已经减少了滤波误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ukrainian Metrological Journal
Ukrainian Metrological Journal INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信