The importance and limitations of ‘Choice’ in child-rearing practices for non-believing older adults

IF 0.9 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Joanna Malone
{"title":"The importance and limitations of ‘Choice’ in child-rearing practices for non-believing older adults","authors":"Joanna Malone","doi":"10.1080/0048721X.2023.2186960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Rising numbers of ‘religious nones’ across many former Christian liberal democracies have brought about increasing academic research to understand this growing population. Questions remain, however, about the mechanisms involved in processes of secularisationr and the growth of non-religion. This article draws on a qualitative study of non-believing older adults in England, reflecting on their practices of child-rearing and socialisation in the second half of the twentieth century, a period identified as crucial to secularisation processes in the UK and elsewhere. Discussions around the importance of ‘choice’ for children in relation to religion are central to participants’ narratives, yet it is shown how freedom of choice is more complex in reality. It also reveals how notions of ‘choice’ and ‘freedom’ in relation to religion can reflect certain social structures, such as gender, and could sit in tension with respondents’ own wishes and desires.","PeriodicalId":46717,"journal":{"name":"RELIGION","volume":"53 1","pages":"335 - 357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RELIGION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2023.2186960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rising numbers of ‘religious nones’ across many former Christian liberal democracies have brought about increasing academic research to understand this growing population. Questions remain, however, about the mechanisms involved in processes of secularisationr and the growth of non-religion. This article draws on a qualitative study of non-believing older adults in England, reflecting on their practices of child-rearing and socialisation in the second half of the twentieth century, a period identified as crucial to secularisation processes in the UK and elsewhere. Discussions around the importance of ‘choice’ for children in relation to religion are central to participants’ narratives, yet it is shown how freedom of choice is more complex in reality. It also reveals how notions of ‘choice’ and ‘freedom’ in relation to religion can reflect certain social structures, such as gender, and could sit in tension with respondents’ own wishes and desires.
“选择”在无信仰老年人育儿实践中的重要性和局限性
在许多前基督教自由民主国家,越来越多的“无宗教信仰者”带来了越来越多的学术研究,以了解这一不断增长的人口。然而,关于世俗化进程和非宗教增长所涉及的机制的问题仍然存在。本文借鉴了对英格兰无信仰老年人的定性研究,反映了他们在20世纪下半叶的育儿和社会化实践,这一时期被认为是英国和其他地方世俗化进程的关键时期。围绕“选择”对儿童在宗教方面的重要性的讨论是参与者叙述的核心,但它显示了选择自由在现实中是如何更加复杂的。它还揭示了与宗教有关的“选择”和“自由”概念如何反映某些社会结构,如性别,并可能与受访者自己的愿望和欲望相冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RELIGION
RELIGION RELIGION-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: RELIGION is an internationally recognized peer-reviewed journal, publishing original scholarly research in the comparative and interdisciplinary study of religion. It is published four times annually: two regular issues; and two special issues (or forums) on focused topics, generally under the direction of guest editors. RELIGION is committed to the publication of significant, novel research, review symposia and responses, and survey articles of specific fields and national contributions to scholarship. In addition, the journal includes book reviews and discussions of important venues for the publication of scholarly work in the study of religion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信