What metrics should we use to measure commercial AI?

AI matters Pub Date : 2019-08-05 DOI:10.1145/3340470.3340479
C. Hughes, Tracey Hughes
{"title":"What metrics should we use to measure commercial AI?","authors":"C. Hughes, Tracey Hughes","doi":"10.1145/3340470.3340479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In AI Matters Volume 4, Issue 2, and Issue 4, we raised the notion of the possibility of an AI Cosmology in part in response to the \"AI Hype Cycle\" that we are currently experiencing. We posited that our current machine learning and big data era represents but one peak among several previous peaks in AI research in which each peak had accompanying \"Hype Cycles\". We associated each peak with an epoch in a possible AI Cosmology. We briefly explored the logic machines, cybernetics, and expert system epochs. One of the objectives of identifying these epochs was to help establish that we have been here before. In particular we've been in the territory where some application of AI research finds substantial commercial success which is then closely followed by AI fever and hype. The public's expectations are heightened only to end in disillusionment when the applications fall short. Whereas it is sometimes somewhat of a challenge even for AI researchers, educators, and practitioners to know where the reality ends and hype begins, the layperson is often in an impossible position and at the mercy of pop culture, marketing and advertising campaigns. We suggested that an AI Cosmology might help us identify a single standard model for AI that could be the foundation for a common shared understanding of what AI is and what it is not. A tool to help the layperson understand where AI has been, where it's going, and where it can't go. Something that could provide a basic road map to help the general public navigate the pitfalls of AI Hype.","PeriodicalId":91445,"journal":{"name":"AI matters","volume":"5 1","pages":"41 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/3340470.3340479","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3340470.3340479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In AI Matters Volume 4, Issue 2, and Issue 4, we raised the notion of the possibility of an AI Cosmology in part in response to the "AI Hype Cycle" that we are currently experiencing. We posited that our current machine learning and big data era represents but one peak among several previous peaks in AI research in which each peak had accompanying "Hype Cycles". We associated each peak with an epoch in a possible AI Cosmology. We briefly explored the logic machines, cybernetics, and expert system epochs. One of the objectives of identifying these epochs was to help establish that we have been here before. In particular we've been in the territory where some application of AI research finds substantial commercial success which is then closely followed by AI fever and hype. The public's expectations are heightened only to end in disillusionment when the applications fall short. Whereas it is sometimes somewhat of a challenge even for AI researchers, educators, and practitioners to know where the reality ends and hype begins, the layperson is often in an impossible position and at the mercy of pop culture, marketing and advertising campaigns. We suggested that an AI Cosmology might help us identify a single standard model for AI that could be the foundation for a common shared understanding of what AI is and what it is not. A tool to help the layperson understand where AI has been, where it's going, and where it can't go. Something that could provide a basic road map to help the general public navigate the pitfalls of AI Hype.
我们应该用什么指标来衡量商业人工智能?
在《人工智能问题》第4卷、第2期和第4期中,我们提出了人工智能宇宙学的可能性的概念,部分是为了回应我们目前正在经历的“人工智能炒作周期”。我们假设,我们当前的机器学习和大数据时代只代表了人工智能研究的几个高峰中的一个高峰,在这些高峰中,每个高峰都伴随着“炒作周期”。我们将每个峰值与可能的人工智能宇宙学中的一个时代联系起来。我们简要探讨了逻辑机、控制论和专家系统的时代。识别这些时代的目标之一是帮助确定我们以前去过这里。特别是,我们所处的领域,人工智能研究的一些应用在商业上取得了巨大成功,随之而来的是人工智能热和炒作。公众的期望值提高了,但当申请失败时,最终却以幻灭告终。尽管有时即使对人工智能研究人员、教育工作者和从业者来说,要知道现实的结束和炒作的开始也有些挑战,但外行往往处于不可能的境地,任由流行文化、营销和广告活动摆布。我们建议,人工智能宇宙学可能有助于我们为人工智能确定一个单一的标准模型,这可能是对人工智能是什么和不是什么的共同理解的基础。一个帮助外行了解人工智能已经在哪里,它将去哪里,以及它不能去哪里的工具。它可以提供一个基本的路线图,帮助公众克服人工智能炒作的陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信