{"title":"The Time of Collective Memory: Social Cohesion and Historical Discontinuity in Paul Ricœur’s Memory, History, Forgetting","authors":"Jeffrey Andrew Barash","doi":"10.5195/errs.2019.471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of principal tasks of Paul Ricoeur’s Memory, History, Forgetting is to analyze the phenomenon of social cohesion, understood not as a uniform bond, but in terms of human plurality that arises from a diversity of perspectives of remembering groups rooted in complex stratifications and concatenations. This paper focuses on the role of remembrance and of its historical inscription as a source of social cohesion, which is subject to rupture and dissolution over time. It first identifies the way in which, according to Ricœur, memory and history function as essential preconditions of social cohesion; following this, it examines the significance and scope of temporal rupture and discontinuity to which this cohesion is subject. In examining Ricœur’s reflection on social cohesion and on the discontinuity to which it is subject over time, I aim to place his thought in a critical light in order to set in relief what I take to be an important aporia it encounters.","PeriodicalId":51981,"journal":{"name":"Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2019.471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
One of principal tasks of Paul Ricoeur’s Memory, History, Forgetting is to analyze the phenomenon of social cohesion, understood not as a uniform bond, but in terms of human plurality that arises from a diversity of perspectives of remembering groups rooted in complex stratifications and concatenations. This paper focuses on the role of remembrance and of its historical inscription as a source of social cohesion, which is subject to rupture and dissolution over time. It first identifies the way in which, according to Ricœur, memory and history function as essential preconditions of social cohesion; following this, it examines the significance and scope of temporal rupture and discontinuity to which this cohesion is subject. In examining Ricœur’s reflection on social cohesion and on the discontinuity to which it is subject over time, I aim to place his thought in a critical light in order to set in relief what I take to be an important aporia it encounters.
Paul Ricoeur的《记忆、历史、遗忘》一书的主要任务之一是分析社会凝聚力现象,社会凝聚力不是一种统一的纽带,而是人类的多元性,这种多元性源于植根于复杂分层和串联的记忆群体的多样性视角。本文关注的是纪念及其历史铭文作为社会凝聚力来源的作用,这种凝聚力随着时间的推移而破裂和瓦解。根据Ricœur的说法,它首先确定了记忆和历史作为社会凝聚力的基本先决条件的作用方式;接下来,它考察了这种衔接所受的时间断裂和不连续的意义和范围。在考察Ricœur对社会凝聚力的反思以及社会凝聚力随着时间的推移而不连续性的反思时,我的目的是将他的思想放在批判的角度,以缓解我认为它遇到的一个重要的aporia。