Role strain: a duo-ethnography of fathers in online doctoral education in the United States

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
John McAvoy, Russell S. Thacker
{"title":"Role strain: a duo-ethnography of fathers in online doctoral education in the United States","authors":"John McAvoy, Russell S. Thacker","doi":"10.1108/sgpe-03-2020-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nWithin the USA, current trends in higher education show more women than men achieving graduate degrees. Among the potential reasons for this disparity is that fathers are reporting challenges in balancing their additional responsibilities while increasing their housework and childcare investment. Many fathers are turning to online graduate education to more effectively balance home and school responsibilities. However, limited portrayals of fathers' experiences in online education exist.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this duoethnography of two online doctoral student fathers, the authors add to the limited literature on both fathers and online students in navigating home, school and work responsibilities. The authors use Goode’s role strain theory to examine the challenges to achieving a balance between each sphere of responsibility and explore strategies for managing these tensions.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors discuss the need for ongoing flexibility and change, the process of navigating feelings of guilt and self-doubt and the ability to engage in daily role bargains. They argue that online education is generally not a panacea for easing role conflict and find that integration is an effective strategy to aid online students' persistence in their programs.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe authors conclude with policy and practice recommendations for future online doctoral student fathers and doctoral program designers.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nLittle research has been conducted from the online doctoral student father lens. This research fills in this gap and lends a voice to fathers who are navigating the doctoral journey.\n","PeriodicalId":42038,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-03-2020-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose Within the USA, current trends in higher education show more women than men achieving graduate degrees. Among the potential reasons for this disparity is that fathers are reporting challenges in balancing their additional responsibilities while increasing their housework and childcare investment. Many fathers are turning to online graduate education to more effectively balance home and school responsibilities. However, limited portrayals of fathers' experiences in online education exist. Design/methodology/approach In this duoethnography of two online doctoral student fathers, the authors add to the limited literature on both fathers and online students in navigating home, school and work responsibilities. The authors use Goode’s role strain theory to examine the challenges to achieving a balance between each sphere of responsibility and explore strategies for managing these tensions. Findings The authors discuss the need for ongoing flexibility and change, the process of navigating feelings of guilt and self-doubt and the ability to engage in daily role bargains. They argue that online education is generally not a panacea for easing role conflict and find that integration is an effective strategy to aid online students' persistence in their programs. Practical implications The authors conclude with policy and practice recommendations for future online doctoral student fathers and doctoral program designers. Originality/value Little research has been conducted from the online doctoral student father lens. This research fills in this gap and lends a voice to fathers who are navigating the doctoral journey.
角色紧张:美国在线博士教育中父亲的双重民族志
目的在美国,目前高等教育的趋势显示,获得研究生学位的女性多于男性。造成这种差异的潜在原因之一是,父亲们报告说,在增加家务和育儿投资的同时,在平衡额外责任方面存在挑战。许多父亲正转向在线研究生教育,以更有效地平衡家庭和学校的责任。然而,对父亲在线教育经历的描述有限。设计/方法论/方法在这本由两位在线博士生父亲组成的双民族志中,作者增加了关于父亲和在线学生在家庭、学校和工作责任方面的有限文献。作者使用古德的角色紧张理论来研究在每个责任领域之间实现平衡的挑战,并探索管理这些紧张关系的策略。发现作者讨论了持续灵活性和变革的必要性,克服内疚感和自我怀疑的过程,以及参与日常角色交易的能力。他们认为,在线教育通常不是缓解角色冲突的灵丹妙药,并发现融合是帮助在线学生坚持学习课程的有效策略。实践意义作者最后为未来的在线博士生父亲和博士项目设计者提出了政策和实践建议。原创性/价值很少有人从网上博士生父亲的角度进行研究。这项研究填补了这一空白,并为正在进行博士之旅的父亲们发出了声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
17
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信