DISCERNING THE FORM AT THE SECOND STAGE OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY

IF 1.5 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Cambridge Law Journal Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1017/S0008197322000526

C. Beuermann

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article uses Atiyah and Summer's categorisation of the attributes of formal legal reasoning in Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law to examine the type of legal reasoning process used by the courts in England and Wales when determining the second stage of vicarious liability. The analysis shows that, although remaining formal in nature, the shift away from the Salmond test has resulted in a shift in the type of form used by the courts. It is suggested that future guidance issued by the Supreme Court to lower courts when determining the second stage of vicarious liability needs to take account of this change for the guidance to be effective.

查看原文本刊更多论文

替代责任第二阶段的形式辨析

摘要本文利用Atiyah和Summer对英美法中形式和实质的正式法律推理属性的分类，考察了英格兰和威尔士法院在确定第二阶段替代责任时使用的法律推理过程的类型。分析表明，尽管在性质上仍然是正式的，但从萨蒙德测试的转变导致了法院使用的形式类型的转变。有人建议，最高法院在确定替代责任的第二阶段时，未来向下级法院发布的指导意见需要考虑到这一变化，才能使指导意见生效。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cambridge Law Journal LAW-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Cambridge Law Journal publishes articles on all aspects of law. Special emphasis is placed on contemporary developments, but the journal''s range includes jurisprudence and legal history. An important feature of the journal is the Case and Comment section, in which members of the Cambridge Law Faculty and other distinguished contributors analyse recent judicial decisions, new legislation and current law reform proposals. The articles and case notes are designed to have the widest appeal to those interested in the law - whether as practitioners, students, teachers, judges or administrators - and to provide an opportunity for them to keep abreast of new ideas and the progress of legal reform. Each issue also contains an extensive section of book reviews.