Longitudinal assessment of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Screen (ECAS): lack of practice effect in ALS patients?

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christian Burkhardt, C. Neuwirth, Markus Weber
{"title":"Longitudinal assessment of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Screen (ECAS): lack of practice effect in ALS patients?","authors":"Christian Burkhardt, C. Neuwirth, Markus Weber","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2017.1283418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: The study objective was to assess whether controls and ALS patients show a practice effect in the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) on repeated longitudinal testing and if the ECAS detects progression of cognitive or behavioural changes over time. Methods: The ECAS was administered serially to ALS patients (n = 24 after six months, n = 10 after 12–18 months) and controls (n = 21 after six months). The ECAS was fully performed by all participants. For comparison purposes the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) was administered to a subgroup of 14 patients and 14 controls. Results: After six months controls showed a significantly higher overall score (p < 0.001) and significantly higher scores in all subdomains of the ECAS, except for visuospatial function and fluency. ALS patients showed no significant difference in any score of the ECAS after six months and up to18 months. Behavioural changes were increasingly, but not statistically, significant, noted by patient carers. The FAB was no longer applicable due to progressive motor deficits in 20% of ALS patients. Conclusions: In conclusion, in contrast to healthy controls, ALS patients show no practice effects. This could reflect ‘pre-symptomatic’ cognitive decline and progressive behavioural symptoms.","PeriodicalId":7740,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration","volume":"18 1","pages":"202 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21678421.2017.1283418","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2017.1283418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The study objective was to assess whether controls and ALS patients show a practice effect in the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) on repeated longitudinal testing and if the ECAS detects progression of cognitive or behavioural changes over time. Methods: The ECAS was administered serially to ALS patients (n = 24 after six months, n = 10 after 12–18 months) and controls (n = 21 after six months). The ECAS was fully performed by all participants. For comparison purposes the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) was administered to a subgroup of 14 patients and 14 controls. Results: After six months controls showed a significantly higher overall score (p < 0.001) and significantly higher scores in all subdomains of the ECAS, except for visuospatial function and fluency. ALS patients showed no significant difference in any score of the ECAS after six months and up to18 months. Behavioural changes were increasingly, but not statistically, significant, noted by patient carers. The FAB was no longer applicable due to progressive motor deficits in 20% of ALS patients. Conclusions: In conclusion, in contrast to healthy controls, ALS patients show no practice effects. This could reflect ‘pre-symptomatic’ cognitive decline and progressive behavioural symptoms.
爱丁堡认知和行为肌萎缩侧索硬化症筛查(ECAS)的纵向评估:ALS患者缺乏实践效果?
摘要目的:本研究的目的是评估对照组和ALS患者在爱丁堡认知和行为ALS筛查(ECAS)中是否表现出重复纵向测试的实践效果,以及ECAS是否检测到认知或行为变化的进展。方法:对ALS患者(6个月后n = 24, 12-18个月后n = 10)和对照组(6个月后n = 21)连续给予ECAS。所有参与者都完成了ECAS。为了进行比较,对14名患者和14名对照组进行了正面评估组(FAB)。结果:6个月后,对照组的总分显著提高(p < 0.001),除视觉空间功能和流畅性外,ECAS的所有子域得分均显著提高。ALS患者在6个月和18个月后的ECAS评分均无显著差异。患者护理人员注意到,行为变化越来越多,但在统计上并不显著。由于20%的ALS患者出现进行性运动障碍,FAB不再适用。结论:与健康对照相比,ALS患者无实践效果。这可能反映了“症状前”认知能力下降和进行性行为症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration is an exciting new initiative. It represents a timely expansion of the journal Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in response to the clinical, imaging pathological and genetic overlap between ALS and frontotemporal dementia. The expanded journal provides outstanding coverage of research in a wide range of issues related to motor neuron diseases, especially ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease) and cognitive decline associated with frontotemporal degeneration. The journal also covers related disorders of the neuroaxis when relevant to these core conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信