Post-Secondary Education and Transition Services for Students Ages 18-21 with Significant Disabilities.

D. Neubert, M. Moon, Meg Grigal
{"title":"Post-Secondary Education and Transition Services for Students Ages 18-21 with Significant Disabilities.","authors":"D. Neubert, M. Moon, Meg Grigal","doi":"10.17161/FOEC.V34I8.6791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the past 20 years, students with significant disabilities (SD) who remain in public school programs until age 21 have generally participated in functional or communitybased instruction (CBI) during their high school years (Agran, Snow, & Swaner, 1999; Billingsley & Albertson, 1999). In some states these students may earn IEP diplomas or certificates of attendance instead of a diploma upon exiting the school system (National Center on Educational Outcomes, 1999). After leaving the school system, these individuals typically have entered supported employment, independent living services, or adult day programs provided by nonprofit community agencies funded by Medicaid, developmental disabilities, and vocational rehabilitation systems (Neubert & Moon, 1999). Many professionals, advocates, and families, however, are questioning when and how often students with SD should participate in CBI during the high school years (Billingsley & Albertson, 1999; Quirk & Bartlinkski; 2001; Tashie, Malloy, & Lichtenstein, 1998) and what type of educational and transitional experiences will lead to more optimal post-school outcomes in integrated settings (Patton et al., 1996; Smith & Puccini, 1995). In 1995 the Division on Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (Council for Exceptional Children) recommended that students who require educational services beyond the age of 18 be allowed to graduate with their peers and then continue their education in settings such as colleges and vocational-technical schools (Smith & Puccini, 1995). Others have supported this philosophical shift to provide age-appropriate interactions with same-age peers; attend classes and social activities on college campuses; work in the community; and participate in flexible, community-based instruction during the final school years (Falvey, Gage, & Eshilian, 1995; Fisher & Sax, 1999; Moon & Inge, 2000; Patton et al., 1996; Tashie et al., 1998). Several reports highlighting transition policy and practices for students with disabilities also have targeted a need for different or specialized transition services for students ages 18-21. The National Council on Disability and Social Security Administration (2000) identified \"expanding secondary transition programs for students ages 18-21 to include twoand four-year college campuses\" (p. 19) in a list of strategies that may lead to more successful post-school outcomes. Also noted was an \"intense need for ... access to individualized and effective post-secondary education services and supports ... and meaningful options for choice by individuals in the pursuit of education, career training, and individualized services and supports\" (p. 17). In a national survey of parent centers funded","PeriodicalId":89924,"journal":{"name":"Focus on exceptional children","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17161/FOEC.V34I8.6791","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on exceptional children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/FOEC.V34I8.6791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

For the past 20 years, students with significant disabilities (SD) who remain in public school programs until age 21 have generally participated in functional or communitybased instruction (CBI) during their high school years (Agran, Snow, & Swaner, 1999; Billingsley & Albertson, 1999). In some states these students may earn IEP diplomas or certificates of attendance instead of a diploma upon exiting the school system (National Center on Educational Outcomes, 1999). After leaving the school system, these individuals typically have entered supported employment, independent living services, or adult day programs provided by nonprofit community agencies funded by Medicaid, developmental disabilities, and vocational rehabilitation systems (Neubert & Moon, 1999). Many professionals, advocates, and families, however, are questioning when and how often students with SD should participate in CBI during the high school years (Billingsley & Albertson, 1999; Quirk & Bartlinkski; 2001; Tashie, Malloy, & Lichtenstein, 1998) and what type of educational and transitional experiences will lead to more optimal post-school outcomes in integrated settings (Patton et al., 1996; Smith & Puccini, 1995). In 1995 the Division on Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (Council for Exceptional Children) recommended that students who require educational services beyond the age of 18 be allowed to graduate with their peers and then continue their education in settings such as colleges and vocational-technical schools (Smith & Puccini, 1995). Others have supported this philosophical shift to provide age-appropriate interactions with same-age peers; attend classes and social activities on college campuses; work in the community; and participate in flexible, community-based instruction during the final school years (Falvey, Gage, & Eshilian, 1995; Fisher & Sax, 1999; Moon & Inge, 2000; Patton et al., 1996; Tashie et al., 1998). Several reports highlighting transition policy and practices for students with disabilities also have targeted a need for different or specialized transition services for students ages 18-21. The National Council on Disability and Social Security Administration (2000) identified "expanding secondary transition programs for students ages 18-21 to include twoand four-year college campuses" (p. 19) in a list of strategies that may lead to more successful post-school outcomes. Also noted was an "intense need for ... access to individualized and effective post-secondary education services and supports ... and meaningful options for choice by individuals in the pursuit of education, career training, and individualized services and supports" (p. 17). In a national survey of parent centers funded
为18至21岁严重残疾学生提供专上教育及过渡服务。
在过去的20年里,在公立学校项目中一直呆到21岁的严重残疾学生(SD)通常在高中期间参加功能性或社区性教学(CBI)(Agran,Snow,&Swaner,1999;Billingsley和Albertson,1999)。在一些州,这些学生在离开学校系统后可能会获得IEP文凭或入学证书,而不是文凭(国家教育成果中心,1999年)。离开学校系统后,这些人通常会进入由医疗补助、发育障碍和职业康复系统资助的非营利社区机构提供的支持性就业、独立生活服务或成人日计划(Neubert&Moon,1999)。然而,许多专业人士、倡导者和家庭,正在质疑患有SD的学生在高中期间应该何时以及多久参加一次CBI(Billingsley&Albertson,1999;Quirk&Bartlinkski;2001;Tasie、Malloy和Lichtenstein,1998),以及在综合环境中,什么类型的教育和过渡经历会带来更优化的放学后结果(Patton等人,1996;Smith和Puccini,1995)。1995年,智力迟钝和发育障碍司(特殊儿童委员会)建议,允许18岁以上需要教育服务的学生与同龄人一起毕业,然后在大学和职业技术学校等环境中继续接受教育(Smith和Puccini,1995年)。其他人支持这种哲学转变,与同龄同龄人进行适龄互动;在大学校园上课和参加社交活动;在社区工作;并在最后几学年参与灵活的、基于社区的教学(Falvey、Gage和Eshilian,1995;Fisher和Sax,1999年;Moon和Inge,2000年;Patton等人,1996年;Tasie等人,1998年)。一些强调残疾学生过渡政策和做法的报告也针对18-21岁学生对不同或专业过渡服务的需求。国家残疾和社会保障管理委员会(2000年)在一份可能带来更成功的放学后成果的战略清单中确定了“扩大18-21岁学生的中学过渡计划,将两年制和四年制大学校园包括在内”(第19页)。还指出,“迫切需要……获得个性化和有效的中学后教育服务和支持……以及个人在追求教育、职业培训和个性化服务和支持方面的有意义的选择”(第17页)。在一项对资助的家长中心的全国性调查中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信