Sourcing Dis/Information: How Swedish and Ukrainian Journalists Source, Verify, and Mediate Journalistic Truth During the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict

IF 2.8 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Nina Springer, Gunnar Nygren, Dariya Orlova, Daria Taradai, Andreas Widholm
{"title":"Sourcing Dis/Information: How Swedish and Ukrainian Journalists Source, Verify, and Mediate Journalistic Truth During the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict","authors":"Nina Springer, Gunnar Nygren, Dariya Orlova, Daria Taradai, Andreas Widholm","doi":"10.1080/1461670X.2023.2196586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Journalists form the middle links of global information chains, playing a decisive role in detecting and dismantling or amplifying problematic information. Information sourcing, verification, and transparency are important tools for journalists when they transmit their sense-making of events, i.e., the journalistic truth, to the audiences. This mixed-methods study of the disinformation-prone conflict between Russia and Ukraine investigates how journalists at different positions on the information chain—i.e., on the ground (Ukraine) and at a distance (Sweden)—source, verify, and narrate their journalistic truth to audiences. We found that, even in high-pressure situations created by hot conflicts, sourcing and verification remain mostly individualized practices that are shaped by internalized unwritten, professional rules of an oral newsroom culture. Verification protocols or specialized tools are largely absent. Sources were sometimes hard to detect in the journalistic content; claims about their verification status even harder. There was a fear that being overtly transparent about sources would jeopardize journalists’ authority. Especially problematic are the precarious working and living conditions for journalists on the ground. These conditions make them vulnerable sources for journalists abroad.","PeriodicalId":17541,"journal":{"name":"Journalism Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"1111 - 1130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2196586","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Journalists form the middle links of global information chains, playing a decisive role in detecting and dismantling or amplifying problematic information. Information sourcing, verification, and transparency are important tools for journalists when they transmit their sense-making of events, i.e., the journalistic truth, to the audiences. This mixed-methods study of the disinformation-prone conflict between Russia and Ukraine investigates how journalists at different positions on the information chain—i.e., on the ground (Ukraine) and at a distance (Sweden)—source, verify, and narrate their journalistic truth to audiences. We found that, even in high-pressure situations created by hot conflicts, sourcing and verification remain mostly individualized practices that are shaped by internalized unwritten, professional rules of an oral newsroom culture. Verification protocols or specialized tools are largely absent. Sources were sometimes hard to detect in the journalistic content; claims about their verification status even harder. There was a fear that being overtly transparent about sources would jeopardize journalists’ authority. Especially problematic are the precarious working and living conditions for journalists on the ground. These conditions make them vulnerable sources for journalists abroad.
来源Dis/信息:瑞典和乌克兰记者如何在俄罗斯-乌克兰冲突期间获取、核实和调解新闻真相
记者是全球信息链的中间环节,在发现、拆解或放大问题信息方面起着决定性的作用。信息来源、核实和透明度是记者向受众传达其对事件的理解,即新闻真相的重要工具。这是对俄罗斯和乌克兰之间容易产生虚假信息的冲突的混合方法研究,调查了在信息链上不同位置的记者如何。,在现场(乌克兰)和在远处(瑞典)-来源,核实,并向观众讲述他们的新闻真相。我们发现,即使在激烈冲突造成的高压情况下,采购和核实仍然主要是个性化的做法,这些做法是由口头新闻编辑室文化中内化的不成文的专业规则塑造的。验证协议或专门的工具在很大程度上是缺失的。有时很难在新闻内容中发现消息来源;要确认他们的身份就更难了。人们担心消息来源过于透明会危及记者的权威。尤其成问题的是记者在当地不稳定的工作和生活条件。这些条件使他们成为海外记者的脆弱消息来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journalism Studies
Journalism Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信