Healthcare utilisation: a mixed-method study among tea garden workers in Indian context

IF 0.9 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sonalee Rajput, Sibasis Hense, K. Thankappan
{"title":"Healthcare utilisation: a mixed-method study among tea garden workers in Indian context","authors":"Sonalee Rajput, Sibasis Hense, K. Thankappan","doi":"10.1108/jhr-02-2021-0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe study examined the utilisation patterns of healthcare services among tea garden workers and analysed the factors influencing utilisation in an Indian context.Design/methodology/approachThe authors employed a mixed-method approach and an explanatory sequential design for the study. A survey was conducted in the beginning followed by in-depth interviews in a north-eastern state of India (Assam). Andersen health behaviour model was used to explore the factors influencing healthcare utilisation. The sample size for the survey and in-depth interviews were 300 and 19, respectively, recruited employing multistage random and purposive sampling techniques.FindingsOut of 300 workers surveyed, 169 (56.3%) were females, 257 (85.7%) were married, 77 (25.7%) were illiterates and 229 (76.3%) had monthly household income less than 100 US$. The survey also found that 47.3% and 15.3% had non-communicable and communicable disease respectively. Most of the workers (67.3%) utilised government facilities, and close to one third (28.7%) utilised tea garden hospitals. About 63.3% had health insurance, but a majority (78.9%) did not use it previously. The analyses of interviews explored the need, enabling, predisposing factors under three important themes influencing utilisation of healthcare services among the workers.Practical implicationsThe study generates evidence to strengthen the Indian Plantation Labour Act, 1951 for tea garden worker's welfare protection and warrants transition from colonial-era policies to contemporary industry realities in order to improve their living, employment, nutritional and health conditions.Originality/valueThe research adds to the existing literature on overall healthcare services utilisation (including coverage and utilisation of health insurance) among blue collar workers who usually lack access to healthcare facilities and explores important factors that determine utilisation in the Indian context.","PeriodicalId":15935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jhr-02-2021-0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe study examined the utilisation patterns of healthcare services among tea garden workers and analysed the factors influencing utilisation in an Indian context.Design/methodology/approachThe authors employed a mixed-method approach and an explanatory sequential design for the study. A survey was conducted in the beginning followed by in-depth interviews in a north-eastern state of India (Assam). Andersen health behaviour model was used to explore the factors influencing healthcare utilisation. The sample size for the survey and in-depth interviews were 300 and 19, respectively, recruited employing multistage random and purposive sampling techniques.FindingsOut of 300 workers surveyed, 169 (56.3%) were females, 257 (85.7%) were married, 77 (25.7%) were illiterates and 229 (76.3%) had monthly household income less than 100 US$. The survey also found that 47.3% and 15.3% had non-communicable and communicable disease respectively. Most of the workers (67.3%) utilised government facilities, and close to one third (28.7%) utilised tea garden hospitals. About 63.3% had health insurance, but a majority (78.9%) did not use it previously. The analyses of interviews explored the need, enabling, predisposing factors under three important themes influencing utilisation of healthcare services among the workers.Practical implicationsThe study generates evidence to strengthen the Indian Plantation Labour Act, 1951 for tea garden worker's welfare protection and warrants transition from colonial-era policies to contemporary industry realities in order to improve their living, employment, nutritional and health conditions.Originality/valueThe research adds to the existing literature on overall healthcare services utilisation (including coverage and utilisation of health insurance) among blue collar workers who usually lack access to healthcare facilities and explores important factors that determine utilisation in the Indian context.
医疗保健利用:印度茶园工人的混合方法研究
目的:本研究调查了茶园工人对医疗保健服务的利用模式,并分析了印度背景下影响利用的因素。设计/方法学/方法作者采用混合方法和解释性顺序设计进行研究。一开始进行了一项调查,随后在印度东北部的一个邦(阿萨姆邦)进行了深入访谈。采用Andersen健康行为模型探讨影响医疗保健利用的因素。调查样本量为300人,深度访谈样本量为19人,采用多阶段随机抽样和有目的抽样技术。调查结果在接受调查的300名工人中,169名(56.3%)是女性,257名(85.7%)已婚,77名(25.7%)不识字,229名(76.3%)家庭月收入低于100美元。调查还发现,分别有47.3%和15.3%的人患有非传染性和传染性疾病。大多数工人(67.3%)使用政府设施,近三分之一(28.7%)使用茶园医院。约63.3%的人有健康保险,但大多数人(78.9%)以前没有使用过。访谈分析探讨了影响工人利用医疗保健服务的三个重要主题下的需求、促成和诱发因素。本研究为加强1951年《印度种植园劳工法》对茶园工人的福利保护提供了证据,并证明了从殖民时代的政策向当代工业现实的转变,以改善他们的生活、就业、营养和健康状况。原创性/价值本研究补充了现有的关于蓝领工人通常无法获得医疗保健设施的总体医疗保健服务利用(包括健康保险的覆盖范围和利用情况)的文献,并探讨了决定印度背景下医疗保健利用情况的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Research
Journal of Health Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信