Comparison of progressed and unresponsive patients with responsive patients at ınterim assessment during breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy

C. Yılmaz, Özlem Özdemir
{"title":"Comparison of progressed and unresponsive patients with responsive patients at ınterim assessment during breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy","authors":"C. Yılmaz, Özlem Özdemir","doi":"10.19161/etd.1166838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: It was aimed to compare the breast cancer patients who were progressed or unresponsive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the patients clinically responsive to the treatment at interim radiological assessment. \nMaterials and Methods: Female patients operated in our hospital for breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively screened. Patients having interim radiological assessment were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups as responsive, unresponsive (stable) and progressive according to the imaging results. Unresponsive and progressive patients were compared to responsive patients in terms of patient and tumor characteristics. \nResults: A total of 96 patients were included in the study. According to the interim imaging results, 90.6% of patients (87 patients) had a radiological response to the treatment. Four patients (4.2%) with radiological unresponsiveness and five patients (5.2%) with radiological progression (9 patients in total, 9.4%) were referred to operation. The mean age of the unresponsive patients was found to be statistically higher than the responding patients (60 vs. 49, p=0.035). The tumor grade and Ki-67 index of unresponsive patients were lower than the responsive patients (respectively; 1.5±0.6 vs. 2.4±0.5, p=0.007 and 10±4 vs. 37±22, p=0.003). Although the tumor grade and Ki-67 index were higher in patients who progressed than the responders, they weren’t statistically significant. Unresponsive patients were mostly luminal A (3/4 patients), and progressive patients were mostly triple negative (3/5 patients) molecular subtype. \nConclusion: Luminal breast cancers with low proliferation index and grade tend to be insensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. On the other hand, hormone receptor negative tumors with high proliferation index and grade may respond well to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and may also pose a risk for progression. Further clinical studies are needed.","PeriodicalId":32499,"journal":{"name":"Ege Tip Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ege Tip Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1166838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: It was aimed to compare the breast cancer patients who were progressed or unresponsive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the patients clinically responsive to the treatment at interim radiological assessment. Materials and Methods: Female patients operated in our hospital for breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively screened. Patients having interim radiological assessment were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups as responsive, unresponsive (stable) and progressive according to the imaging results. Unresponsive and progressive patients were compared to responsive patients in terms of patient and tumor characteristics. Results: A total of 96 patients were included in the study. According to the interim imaging results, 90.6% of patients (87 patients) had a radiological response to the treatment. Four patients (4.2%) with radiological unresponsiveness and five patients (5.2%) with radiological progression (9 patients in total, 9.4%) were referred to operation. The mean age of the unresponsive patients was found to be statistically higher than the responding patients (60 vs. 49, p=0.035). The tumor grade and Ki-67 index of unresponsive patients were lower than the responsive patients (respectively; 1.5±0.6 vs. 2.4±0.5, p=0.007 and 10±4 vs. 37±22, p=0.003). Although the tumor grade and Ki-67 index were higher in patients who progressed than the responders, they weren’t statistically significant. Unresponsive patients were mostly luminal A (3/4 patients), and progressive patients were mostly triple negative (3/5 patients) molecular subtype. Conclusion: Luminal breast cancers with low proliferation index and grade tend to be insensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. On the other hand, hormone receptor negative tumors with high proliferation index and grade may respond well to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and may also pose a risk for progression. Further clinical studies are needed.
癌症新辅助化疗期间进展期和无反应期患者与反应期患者的比较
目的:比较癌症新辅助化疗进展或无反应的患者与中期放射学评估中对治疗有临床反应的患者。材料与方法:回顾性筛选癌症新辅助化疗后在我院手术治疗的女性患者。接受中期放射学评估的患者被纳入研究。根据影像学结果将患者分为有反应、无反应(稳定)和进行性三组。在患者和肿瘤特征方面,将无反应和进行性患者与有反应的患者进行比较。结果:本研究共纳入96例患者。根据中期影像学结果,90.6%的患者(87名患者)对治疗有放射学反应。4名(4.2%)放射学无反应患者和5名(5.2%)放射学进展患者(共9名,9.4%)被转诊至手术。无反应患者的平均年龄在统计学上高于有反应的患者(60 vs.49,p=0.035)。无反应患者肿瘤分级和Ki-67指数低于有反应患者(分别为1.5±0.6 vs.2.4±0.5,p=0.007和10±4 vs.37±22,p=0.003)响应者,他们没有统计学意义。无反应的患者大多为管腔A型(3/4名患者),进展期患者大多为三阴性(3/5名患者)分子亚型。结论:低增殖指数、低级别的乳腺癌对新辅助化疗不敏感。另一方面,具有高增殖指数和分级的激素受体阴性肿瘤可能对新辅助化疗反应良好,也可能存在进展风险。还需要进一步的临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信