Patterns of Care Partner Communication for Persons Living with Dementia in the Emergency Department.

Adrian D Haimovich, Aidan Gilson, Evangeline Gao, Ling Chi, Cameron J Gettel, Mara Schonberg, Ula Hwang, Richard Andrew Taylor
{"title":"Patterns of Care Partner Communication for Persons Living with Dementia in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Adrian D Haimovich, Aidan Gilson, Evangeline Gao, Ling Chi, Cameron J Gettel, Mara Schonberg, Ula Hwang, Richard Andrew Taylor","doi":"10.17294/2694-4715.1043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nearly half of all persons living with dementia (PLwD) will visit the emergency department (ED) in any given year and ED visits by PLwD are associated with short-term adverse outcomes. Care partner engagement is critical in the care of PLwD, but little is known about their patterns of communication with ED clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective electronic health record (EHR) review of a random sampling of patients ≥ 65 years with a historical diagnosis code of dementia who visited an ED within a large regional health network between 1/2014 and 1/2022. ED notes within the EHRs were coded for documentation of care partner communication and presence of a care partner in the ED. Logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with the composite outcome of either care partner communication or care partner presence in the ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 460 patients were included. The median age was 83.0 years, 59.3% were female, 11.3% were Black, and 7.6% Hispanic. A care partner was documented in the ED for 22.4% of the visits and care partner communication documented for 43.9% of visits. 54.8% of patients had no documentation of care partner communication nor evidence of a care partner at the bedside. In multivariate logistic regression, increasing age (OR, (95% CI): 1.06 (1.04-1.09)), altered mental status (OR: 2.26 (1.01-5.05)), and weakness (OR: 3.38 (1.49-7.65)) significantly increased the probability of having care partner communication documented or a care partner at the bedside.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than half of PLwD in our sample did not have clinician documentation of communication with a care partner or a care partner in the ED. Further studies are needed to use these insights to improve communication with care partners of PLwD in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":73757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10698392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2694-4715.1043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nearly half of all persons living with dementia (PLwD) will visit the emergency department (ED) in any given year and ED visits by PLwD are associated with short-term adverse outcomes. Care partner engagement is critical in the care of PLwD, but little is known about their patterns of communication with ED clinicians.

Methods: We performed a retrospective electronic health record (EHR) review of a random sampling of patients ≥ 65 years with a historical diagnosis code of dementia who visited an ED within a large regional health network between 1/2014 and 1/2022. ED notes within the EHRs were coded for documentation of care partner communication and presence of a care partner in the ED. Logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with the composite outcome of either care partner communication or care partner presence in the ED.

Results: A total of 460 patients were included. The median age was 83.0 years, 59.3% were female, 11.3% were Black, and 7.6% Hispanic. A care partner was documented in the ED for 22.4% of the visits and care partner communication documented for 43.9% of visits. 54.8% of patients had no documentation of care partner communication nor evidence of a care partner at the bedside. In multivariate logistic regression, increasing age (OR, (95% CI): 1.06 (1.04-1.09)), altered mental status (OR: 2.26 (1.01-5.05)), and weakness (OR: 3.38 (1.49-7.65)) significantly increased the probability of having care partner communication documented or a care partner at the bedside.

Conclusion: More than half of PLwD in our sample did not have clinician documentation of communication with a care partner or a care partner in the ED. Further studies are needed to use these insights to improve communication with care partners of PLwD in the ED.

急诊科痴呆症患者的护理伙伴交流模式
引言在任何一年,近一半的痴呆症患者都会去急诊科就诊,而痴呆症患者的急诊就诊与短期不良后果有关。护理伙伴的参与在PLwD的护理中至关重要,但人们对他们与ED临床医生的沟通模式知之甚少。方法我们对2014年1月至2022年1月期间在大型区域卫生网络内就诊的痴呆症历史诊断代码≥65岁的患者进行了回顾性电子健康记录(EHR)审查。EHR中的ED记录被编码用于记录护理伙伴沟通和ED中护理伙伴的存在。使用Logistic回归来确定与护理伙伴沟通或ED中护理伴侣存在的复合结果相关的患者特征。结果共纳入460名患者。中位年龄为83.0岁,59.3%为女性,11.3%为黑人,7.6%为西班牙裔。22.4%的就诊记录有护理伙伴,43.9%的就诊记录了护理伙伴沟通。54.8%的患者没有护理伙伴沟通的记录,也没有护理伙伴在床边的证据。在多变量逻辑回归中,年龄增加(OR,(95%CI):1.06(1.04-1.09))、精神状态改变(OR:2.26(1.01-5.05))和虚弱(OR:3.38(1.49-7.65))显著增加了记录护理伙伴沟通或护理伙伴在床边的概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信