Hemithorax Opacification & Large Volume Thoracentesis: A Novel Predictor of Re-Expansion Pulmonary Edema

E. PradoVictor, X. ChenShasha, Basu Anupam, J. WakefieldConnor, Sukhal Shashvat, A. PatelSanjay, B. SmithSean
{"title":"Hemithorax Opacification & Large Volume Thoracentesis: A Novel Predictor of Re-Expansion Pulmonary Edema","authors":"E. PradoVictor, X. ChenShasha, Basu Anupam, J. WakefieldConnor, Sukhal Shashvat, A. PatelSanjay, B. SmithSean","doi":"10.23937/2378-3516/1410159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Symptomatic pleural effusions are a common reason for hospital visits. Guidelines recommend draining < 1.5 L with large-volume thoracentesis (LVT) to avoid re-expansion pulmonary edema (REPE). Hemithorax opacification by pleural fluid on chest X-ray (CXR) has not been studied as predictor of REPE. We evaluated the incidence of REPE using hemithorax opacification on CXR. Methods: We reviewed LVTs with preand post-procedural chest CXR from 2008 to 2019 at a tertiary urban hospital. Image J software was used to calculate the percentage of hemithorax opacification before and after drainage. CXRs were independently reviewed by a radiologist and interventional pulmonologist-both blinded to clinical data. Clinical REPE was separately according to clinical signs and symptoms. Results: 198 LVTs with CXRs were reviewed. Median volume drained was 1.8 L (IQR 1.6 L-2.0 L) and median percent opacification drained was 26% (IQR 13-40%): 11.1% of cases drained > 50% opacification, and 17.7% had complete drainage. 177 post-procedural CXRs were amenable for evaluation and 20.3% had evidence of radiographic REPE. In those with radiographic REPE, 2.5% had clinical REPE. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that draining > 50% of the opacified hemithorax was associated with radiographic REPE (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.09-11.26, p = 0.035) and clinical REPE (OR 11.22, 95% CI 1.67-75.16, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Radiographic REPE was relatively common, but often without symptoms. The reduction of > 50% of hemithorax opacification is a novel predictor of REPE. We suggest individualizing limitations of fluid removal according to hemithorax opacification and clinical scenario rather than an arbitrary cutoff of 1.5 L.","PeriodicalId":91516,"journal":{"name":"International journal of respiratory and pulmonary medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of respiratory and pulmonary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3516/1410159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Symptomatic pleural effusions are a common reason for hospital visits. Guidelines recommend draining < 1.5 L with large-volume thoracentesis (LVT) to avoid re-expansion pulmonary edema (REPE). Hemithorax opacification by pleural fluid on chest X-ray (CXR) has not been studied as predictor of REPE. We evaluated the incidence of REPE using hemithorax opacification on CXR. Methods: We reviewed LVTs with preand post-procedural chest CXR from 2008 to 2019 at a tertiary urban hospital. Image J software was used to calculate the percentage of hemithorax opacification before and after drainage. CXRs were independently reviewed by a radiologist and interventional pulmonologist-both blinded to clinical data. Clinical REPE was separately according to clinical signs and symptoms. Results: 198 LVTs with CXRs were reviewed. Median volume drained was 1.8 L (IQR 1.6 L-2.0 L) and median percent opacification drained was 26% (IQR 13-40%): 11.1% of cases drained > 50% opacification, and 17.7% had complete drainage. 177 post-procedural CXRs were amenable for evaluation and 20.3% had evidence of radiographic REPE. In those with radiographic REPE, 2.5% had clinical REPE. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that draining > 50% of the opacified hemithorax was associated with radiographic REPE (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.09-11.26, p = 0.035) and clinical REPE (OR 11.22, 95% CI 1.67-75.16, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Radiographic REPE was relatively common, but often without symptoms. The reduction of > 50% of hemithorax opacification is a novel predictor of REPE. We suggest individualizing limitations of fluid removal according to hemithorax opacification and clinical scenario rather than an arbitrary cutoff of 1.5 L.
半胸不透明和大容量胸腔镜检查:再膨胀性肺水肿的新预测指标
症状性胸腔积液是就诊的常见原因。指南建议大容量胸腔穿刺术(LVT)引流< 1.5 L以避免再扩张性肺水肿(REPE)。胸片上胸腔积液引起的半胸混浊尚未被研究作为REPE的预测因子。我们用半胸x光造影评估REPE的发生率。方法:回顾性分析2008年至2019年在某三级城市医院进行的lvt术前和术后胸部x光检查。采用Image J软件计算引流前后半胸混浊率。一名放射科医生和一名介入性肺科医生对x光片进行了独立审查,他们都不了解临床数据。临床REPE根据临床症状和体征分别进行。结果:回顾性分析了198例LVTs合并cxr。引流容积中位数为1.8 L (IQR为1.6 L-2.0 L),引流混浊率中位数为26% (IQR为13-40%),其中11.1%的病例引流浑浊率为50%,17.7%的病例引流完全。177例术后cxr可用于评估,20.3%有影像学REPE证据。在影像学上有REPE的患者中,2.5%有临床REPE。多因素回归分析显示,引流50%的混浊半胸与影像学REPE (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.09-11.26, p = 0.035)和临床REPE (OR 11.22, 95% CI 1.67-75.16, p = 0.013)相关。结论:放射学上的REPE较为常见,但常无症状。半胸混浊减少50%是一种新的预测REPE的指标。我们建议根据半胸混浊和临床情况对液体清除进行个体化限制,而不是武断地切断1.5 L。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书