Considering a case for rights and charity

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
A. Masters
{"title":"Considering a case for rights and charity","authors":"A. Masters","doi":"10.1080/1474225X.2022.2055330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The ‘charity’ model of disability has been soundly rejected by individuals with disabilities for one that emphasises rights. Although good to be rejected, rights also have limits, as evidenced by the ongoing transgression against the rights of persons with disabilities (PWD). What new insights in Christian theology might positively impact this? It will be difficult, as long as the charity model continues to pervade Christian faith communities. While researching the rupture between practice and the faith proclaimed within the US Catholic Church regarding individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), I discovered a meta-narrative which I named the shadow narrative, because it eclipses the light of the Gospel, and leads to the devaluation and marginalisation of individuals with IDD, or any other group of people not valued by the normative culture. The co-opted version of charity is by far its most popular thread. By shining a light on the shadow narrative to reveal its undercurrents and returning to scriptural texts that underpin Christian charity, I will propose a case for Rights and Charity to renew attitudes about and opportunities for individuals with disabilities within faith communities, which could then become leaven for society.","PeriodicalId":42198,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church","volume":"22 1","pages":"58 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225X.2022.2055330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ‘charity’ model of disability has been soundly rejected by individuals with disabilities for one that emphasises rights. Although good to be rejected, rights also have limits, as evidenced by the ongoing transgression against the rights of persons with disabilities (PWD). What new insights in Christian theology might positively impact this? It will be difficult, as long as the charity model continues to pervade Christian faith communities. While researching the rupture between practice and the faith proclaimed within the US Catholic Church regarding individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), I discovered a meta-narrative which I named the shadow narrative, because it eclipses the light of the Gospel, and leads to the devaluation and marginalisation of individuals with IDD, or any other group of people not valued by the normative culture. The co-opted version of charity is by far its most popular thread. By shining a light on the shadow narrative to reveal its undercurrents and returning to scriptural texts that underpin Christian charity, I will propose a case for Rights and Charity to renew attitudes about and opportunities for individuals with disabilities within faith communities, which could then become leaven for society.
考虑一个关于权利和慈善的案子
摘要残疾的“慈善”模式因强调权利而遭到残疾人的强烈反对。尽管被拒绝是好事,但权利也有局限性,对残疾人权利的持续侵犯就是明证。基督教神学中有哪些新的见解可能会对这一点产生积极影响?只要慈善模式继续渗透到基督教信仰社区,这将是困难的。在研究美国天主教会内部关于智力和发育障碍(IDD)患者的实践和信仰之间的破裂时,我发现了一种元叙事,我将其命名为影子叙事,因为它掩盖了福音的光芒,并导致IDD患者的贬值和边缘化,或者任何其他不受规范文化重视的群体。慈善的增选版是迄今为止最受欢迎的话题。通过照亮阴影叙事,揭示其暗流,并回归支持基督教慈善的圣经文本,我将为“权利与慈善”提出一个案例,以更新信仰社区中对残疾人的态度和机会,这可能会成为社会的发酵剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信