Data Analytics and the Erosion of the Work/Nonwork Divide

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q3 BUSINESS
Leora Eisenstadt
{"title":"Data Analytics and the Erosion of the Work/Nonwork Divide","authors":"Leora Eisenstadt","doi":"10.1111/ablj.12146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Numerous statutes and common law doctrines conceive of a dividing line between work time and nonwork time and delineate the activities that must be compensated as work. While technological innovations and increasing desires for workplace flexibility have begun to erode this divide, it persists, in part, because of the ways in which the division protects employers and employees alike. Nonetheless, the explosion of data analytics programs that allow employers to monitor and rely upon a worker's off-duty conduct will soon weaken the dividing line between work and nonwork in dramatically greater and more troubling ways than ever before. The emergence of programs allowing employers to track, predict, rely upon, and possibly control nonwork activities, views, preferences, and emotions represents a major blurring of the line between work and nonwork. This article contends that these advances in data analytics suggest a need to reexamine the notion of work versus nonwork time and to question whether existing protections adequately consider a world in which these lines are so significantly muddled. As a society, we need to acknowledge the implications of the availability of massive quantities of employees’ off-duty data and to decide whether and how to regulate its use by employers. Whether we, as a society, decide to allow market forces to dictate acceptable employer behavior, choose to regulate and restrict the use of off-duty data for adverse employment decisions, or find some middle ground that requires disclosure and consent, we should choose our own course rather than allowing the technology to be the guide.</p>","PeriodicalId":54186,"journal":{"name":"American Business Law Journal","volume":"56 3","pages":"445-506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ablj.12146","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Business Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ablj.12146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous statutes and common law doctrines conceive of a dividing line between work time and nonwork time and delineate the activities that must be compensated as work. While technological innovations and increasing desires for workplace flexibility have begun to erode this divide, it persists, in part, because of the ways in which the division protects employers and employees alike. Nonetheless, the explosion of data analytics programs that allow employers to monitor and rely upon a worker's off-duty conduct will soon weaken the dividing line between work and nonwork in dramatically greater and more troubling ways than ever before. The emergence of programs allowing employers to track, predict, rely upon, and possibly control nonwork activities, views, preferences, and emotions represents a major blurring of the line between work and nonwork. This article contends that these advances in data analytics suggest a need to reexamine the notion of work versus nonwork time and to question whether existing protections adequately consider a world in which these lines are so significantly muddled. As a society, we need to acknowledge the implications of the availability of massive quantities of employees’ off-duty data and to decide whether and how to regulate its use by employers. Whether we, as a society, decide to allow market forces to dictate acceptable employer behavior, choose to regulate and restrict the use of off-duty data for adverse employment decisions, or find some middle ground that requires disclosure and consent, we should choose our own course rather than allowing the technology to be the guide.

数据分析与工作/非工作鸿沟的侵蚀
许多法规和普通法学说都设想了工作时间和非工作时间之间的分界线,并将必须作为工作补偿的活动划分开来。虽然技术创新和对工作场所灵活性的日益渴望已经开始削弱这种分歧,但这种分歧仍然存在,部分原因是该部门保护雇主和雇员的方式。尽管如此,允许雇主监控和依赖员工下班行为的数据分析程序的激增,将很快以比以往任何时候都更大、更令人不安的方式削弱工作和非工作之间的分界线。这些进步的例子比比皆是。雇主已经开始依赖算法,从员工的社交媒体和其他在线档案中获取大量数据,并利用这些数据筛选出最高效的团队和最优秀的员工。雇主现在可以使用数据分析来跟踪和预测员工的计划生育想法和医疗保健问题,或者使用面部识别技术和情绪分析来预测员工的情绪状态。这些允许雇主跟踪、预测、依赖并可能控制非工作活动、观点、偏好和情绪的程序的出现,代表着工作和非工作之间的界限严重模糊。数据分析和工作/非工作鸿沟的侵蚀认为,预测分析的这些进步表明,有必要重新审视工作与非工作时间的概念,并质疑现有的保护措施是否充分考虑到了一个这些界限严重混乱的世界。作为一个社会,我们需要认识到大量员工下班数据的可用性所带来的影响,并决定是否以及如何监管雇主对其的使用。作为一个社会,无论我们决定允许市场力量支配可接受的雇主行为,还是选择监管和限制使用下班数据做出不利的就业决定,或者找到一些需要披露和同意的中间立场,我们都应该选择一条路,而不是让技术创新成为指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The ABLJ is a faculty-edited, double blind peer reviewed journal, continuously published since 1963. Our mission is to publish only top quality law review articles that make a scholarly contribution to all areas of law that impact business theory and practice. We search for those articles that articulate a novel research question and make a meaningful contribution directly relevant to scholars and practitioners of business law. The blind peer review process means legal scholars well-versed in the relevant specialty area have determined selected articles are original, thorough, important, and timely. Faculty editors assure the authors’ contribution to scholarship is evident. We aim to elevate legal scholarship and inform responsible business decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信