Fanaticism as a Τype of Μentality in the Works of Gabriel Marcel and Karen Armstrong

Q3 Arts and Humanities
F. I. Guseynov
{"title":"Fanaticism as a Τype of Μentality in the Works of Gabriel Marcel and Karen Armstrong","authors":"F. I. Guseynov","doi":"10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-3-697-712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author examines the fanatical type of mentality in its secular and religious forms based on the analysis of the works of Gabriel Marcel and Karen Armstrong. The origins of the phenomenon of fanaticism are found in the basic foundations of Modern culture as the time of the replacement of myth by logos (Armstrong) and the domination of the abstract spirit (Marcel). The understanding of the foundations of fanaticism as a broad phenomenon undertaken by the French philosopher and the British religious scholar is associated with interpretations of the concept of the transcendent. Although the socio-spiritual situation in which Marcel and Armstrong work is different, their conclusions generally coincide and become especially relevant today, when the world is on the verge of a new world war. The author briefly formulates definitions of some basic categories of G. Marcel's philosophy - \"philosophical experience\", \"first reflection\", \"second reflection\", \"fanaticized consciousness\", \"disparity\", \"abstraction\", \"abstract spirit\", \"collective violence\", \"property\", \"being\", \"ideologue\", \"intersubjectivity\", \"identity\", etc. Gabriel Marcel's reflection on the fundamental difference between a true believer and a religious fanatic is discussed, despite the fact that both are spoken on behalf of absolute values. The will to refuse to \"question\" the object of one's faith presupposes immunity to the arguments of critical thinking, which by definition would be intended to act as a kind of antidote to fanaticism as a special type of radical consciousness. The basis of fanaticism turns out to be insensitivity to what is the fanatic's idefix, while modern fanatics, in contrast to the ordinary idea of them, are often well-educated people. This is a decentered consciousness dominated by \"carnal thought\". Such an idea may be called the idea of equality or justice, but it is not actually a thought born from experience and sympathy for people.","PeriodicalId":32651,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-3-697-712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author examines the fanatical type of mentality in its secular and religious forms based on the analysis of the works of Gabriel Marcel and Karen Armstrong. The origins of the phenomenon of fanaticism are found in the basic foundations of Modern culture as the time of the replacement of myth by logos (Armstrong) and the domination of the abstract spirit (Marcel). The understanding of the foundations of fanaticism as a broad phenomenon undertaken by the French philosopher and the British religious scholar is associated with interpretations of the concept of the transcendent. Although the socio-spiritual situation in which Marcel and Armstrong work is different, their conclusions generally coincide and become especially relevant today, when the world is on the verge of a new world war. The author briefly formulates definitions of some basic categories of G. Marcel's philosophy - "philosophical experience", "first reflection", "second reflection", "fanaticized consciousness", "disparity", "abstraction", "abstract spirit", "collective violence", "property", "being", "ideologue", "intersubjectivity", "identity", etc. Gabriel Marcel's reflection on the fundamental difference between a true believer and a religious fanatic is discussed, despite the fact that both are spoken on behalf of absolute values. The will to refuse to "question" the object of one's faith presupposes immunity to the arguments of critical thinking, which by definition would be intended to act as a kind of antidote to fanaticism as a special type of radical consciousness. The basis of fanaticism turns out to be insensitivity to what is the fanatic's idefix, while modern fanatics, in contrast to the ordinary idea of them, are often well-educated people. This is a decentered consciousness dominated by "carnal thought". Such an idea may be called the idea of equality or justice, but it is not actually a thought born from experience and sympathy for people.
狂热主义在加布里埃尔·马塞尔和卡伦·阿姆斯特朗作品中的Τype和Μentality
本文通过对加布里埃尔·马塞尔和卡伦·阿姆斯特朗作品的分析,从世俗和宗教两方面考察了狂热的心理类型。狂热现象的根源在于现代文化的基本基础,即理性取代神话的时代(阿姆斯特朗)和抽象精神的统治时代(马塞尔)。法国哲学家和英国宗教学者对狂热作为一种广泛现象的基础的理解与对超验概念的解释有关。虽然马塞尔和阿姆斯特朗所处的社会精神环境不同,但他们的结论总体上是一致的,在世界即将爆发一场新的世界大战的今天,这一点尤为重要。本文简要阐述了马塞尔哲学的几个基本范畴——“哲学经验”、“第一反思”、“第二反思”、“狂热意识”、“差异”、“抽象”、“抽象精神”、“集体暴力”、“财产”、“存在”、“意识形态”、“主体间性”、“同一性”等的定义。Gabriel Marcel对一个真正的信徒和一个宗教狂热分子之间的根本区别的思考被讨论,尽管事实上两者都代表绝对的价值观。拒绝"质疑"自己信仰的对象的意志,以对批判性思维论点的免疫为前提,而批判性思维的定义是作为一种特殊类型的激进意识的狂热的解毒剂。狂热的基础原来是对狂热者的身份不敏感,而现代狂热者,与他们的一般观念相反,往往是受过良好教育的人。这是一种被“肉体思想”支配的非中心意识。这种思想可以称为平等或正义的思想,但它实际上并不是一种产生于经验和对人的同情的思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
RUDN Journal of Philosophy Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信