Produktivitas Kerja Saat Work From Home (WFH) dan Work From Office (WFO) pada Dosen FKM Universitas Mulawarman di Masa Pandemi Covid-19

IF 0.9 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Journal of Information & Knowledge Management Pub Date : 2021-03-06 DOI:10.52022/JIKM.V13I1.172

R. Susanti, Dinda Tasya Amelia, Fina Damaiyana, Oryza Regina Bernadine

{"title":"Produktivitas Kerja Saat Work From Home (WFH) dan Work From Office (WFO) pada Dosen FKM Universitas Mulawarman di Masa Pandemi Covid-19","authors":"R. Susanti, Dinda Tasya Amelia, Fina Damaiyana, Oryza Regina Bernadine","doi":"10.52022/JIKM.V13I1.172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak \nLatar Belakang: Virus corona yang terus meningkat menyebabkan sekolah dijalankan secara Work From Home (WFH) dengan online. Produktivitas kerja menjadi suatu permasalahan jika pekerja bekerja di rumah, termasuk seorang dosen. \nTujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui perbedaan produktivitas kerja pada saat Work From Home (WFH) dan Work From Office (WFO) dimasa Pandemi. \nMetode: Desain penelitian ini adalah cross sectional yang berjenis kuantitatif. Jumlah populasi sebanyak 31 tenaga kependididkan dan dosen dengan teknik sampel yaitu total sampling. Analisis data yang digunakan ialah analisis univariat, bivariat dengan uji Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test dengan tingkat kepercayaan sebesar 95%. \nHasil: Hasil analisis menggunakan uji wilconxon signed rank test didapatkan nilai sig sebesar 0.219 > 0.05 yang berarti H0 diitolak. \nKesimpulan: Tidak ada perbedaan produktivitas kerja pada tenaga kependidikan dan dosen pengajar Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Mulawarman pada saat Work From Home (WFH) dan Work From Office (WFO) di masa pandemi. \nWork Productivity Differences in Education and Teachers of Faculty of Public Health when WFH (Work From Home) and WFO (Work From Office) at FKM Lectures of Mulawarman University during Pandemic \nAbstract \nBackground: The corona virus which continues to increase causes schools to run online as WFH (Work From Home). Various problems arise due to the rules for lecturers to teach at home, one of which is the productivity of the lecturers. \nPurpose: This study aims to determine the differences in work productivity during WFH (Work From Home) and WFO (Work From Office) during the Pandemic. \nMethods: The design of this study was a cross sectional quantitative type. The total population was 31 education staff and lecturers with the sampling technique using the total sampling technique. The data analysis used was univariate, bivariate analysis with the Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test with a confidence level of 95%. \nResults: The results of the analysis using the Wilcoxon signed rank test obtained a sig value of 0.219> 0.05, which means that H0 is rejected. \nConclusion: There was no difference in work productivity among teaching staff and lecturers at the Faculty of Public Health, Mulawarman University during the Work From Home (WFH) and Work From Office (WFO) during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":45460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information & Knowledge Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information & Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52022/JIKM.V13I1.172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstrak Latar Belakang: Virus corona yang terus meningkat menyebabkan sekolah dijalankan secara Work From Home (WFH) dengan online. Produktivitas kerja menjadi suatu permasalahan jika pekerja bekerja di rumah, termasuk seorang dosen. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui perbedaan produktivitas kerja pada saat Work From Home (WFH) dan Work From Office (WFO) dimasa Pandemi. Metode: Desain penelitian ini adalah cross sectional yang berjenis kuantitatif. Jumlah populasi sebanyak 31 tenaga kependididkan dan dosen dengan teknik sampel yaitu total sampling. Analisis data yang digunakan ialah analisis univariat, bivariat dengan uji Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test dengan tingkat kepercayaan sebesar 95%. Hasil: Hasil analisis menggunakan uji wilconxon signed rank test didapatkan nilai sig sebesar 0.219 > 0.05 yang berarti H0 diitolak. Kesimpulan: Tidak ada perbedaan produktivitas kerja pada tenaga kependidikan dan dosen pengajar Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Mulawarman pada saat Work From Home (WFH) dan Work From Office (WFO) di masa pandemi. Work Productivity Differences in Education and Teachers of Faculty of Public Health when WFH (Work From Home) and WFO (Work From Office) at FKM Lectures of Mulawarman University during Pandemic Abstract Background: The corona virus which continues to increase causes schools to run online as WFH (Work From Home). Various problems arise due to the rules for lecturers to teach at home, one of which is the productivity of the lecturers. Purpose: This study aims to determine the differences in work productivity during WFH (Work From Home) and WFO (Work From Office) during the Pandemic. Methods: The design of this study was a cross sectional quantitative type. The total population was 31 education staff and lecturers with the sampling technique using the total sampling technique. The data analysis used was univariate, bivariate analysis with the Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test with a confidence level of 95%. Results: The results of the analysis using the Wilcoxon signed rank test obtained a sig value of 0.219> 0.05, which means that H0 is rejected. Conclusion: There was no difference in work productivity among teaching staff and lecturers at the Faculty of Public Health, Mulawarman University during the Work From Home (WFH) and Work From Office (WFO) during the pandemic.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在Covid-19大流行期间，Mulawarman大学FKM讲师的工作和办公室的工作效率

Abstrak Latar Belakang：在家工作（WFH）的网上传播的冠状病毒正在增加。工作人员的生产活动是长期的，而不是长期的，包括长期的生产活动。Tujuan：在Pandemi的家庭工作（WFH）和办公室工作（WFO）期间，这一阶段的员工生产活动受到了影响。方法：本次设计为宽截面。人口总数为31人，并采用抽样技术，即总抽样。使用的分析数据是单变量、双变量的分析，采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验，其准确率为95%。Hasil：我们的分析使用了一个签名等级测试，该测试的值为0.219>0.05，属于H0。影响因素：在家庭工作（WFH）和办公室工作（WFO）期间，穆拉瓦曼大学的教育工作者和公众健康专家的生产活动没有得到改善。流行病期间，在穆拉瓦曼大学FKM讲座上，WFH（在家工作）和WFO（在办公室工作）时，教育和公共卫生学院教师的工作生产率差异摘要背景：持续增加的冠状病毒导致学校以WFH（从家工作）的形式在线运行。由于讲师在家授课的规定，出现了各种问题，其中之一就是讲师的生产力。目的：本研究旨在确定疫情期间WFH（在家工作）和WFO（在办公室工作）工作生产率的差异。方法：本研究采用横断面定量设计。总人口为31名教育工作者和讲师，采用总抽样技术进行抽样。使用的数据分析是单变量、双变量分析，采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验，置信水平为95%。结果：使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验的分析结果获得了0.219>0.05的sig值，这意味着H0被拒绝。结论：穆拉瓦曼大学公共卫生学院的教职员工和讲师在疫情期间在家工作（WFH）和在办公室工作（WFO）的工作效率没有差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Information & Knowledge Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： JIKM is a refereed journal published quarterly by World Scientific and dedicated to the exchange of the latest research and practical information in the field of information processing and knowledge management. The journal publishes original research and case studies by academic, business and government contributors on all aspects of information processing, information management, knowledge management, tools, techniques and technologies, knowledge creation and sharing, best practices, policies and guidelines. JIKM is an international journal aimed at providing quality information to subscribers around the world. Managed by an international editorial board, JIKM positions itself as one of the leading scholarly journals in the field of information processing and knowledge management. It is a good reference for both information and knowledge management professionals. The journal covers key areas in the field of information and knowledge management. Research papers, practical applications, working papers, and case studies are invited in the following areas: -Business intelligence and competitive intelligence -Communication and organizational culture -e-Learning and life long learning -Electronic records and document management -Information processing and information management -Information organization, taxonomies and ontology -Intellectual capital -Knowledge creation, retention, sharing and transfer -Knowledge discovery, data and text mining -Knowledge management and innovations -Knowledge management education -Knowledge management tools and technologies -Knowledge management measurements -Knowledge professionals and leadership -Learning organization and organizational learning -Practical implementations of knowledge management