Non-market mechanisms under article 6.8 of the Paris Agreement: a transnational perspective

Q2 Social Sciences

Transnational Legal Theory Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/20414005.2023.2174718

Rosanna Anderson

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Article 6.8 was included in the Paris Agreement in the last minutes of COP15 after years of advocacy for non-market approaches (NMAs), predominately from Bolivia. Between 2015 - 2021, however, the development of NMAs remained largely stagnant and was hindered by ideological and financial disagreements during negotiations. Despite challenges, the operationalisation of NMAs under Article 6.8 has recently started to take shape. Driving this are the development and maturing of relevant pilot projects, such as the Adaptation Benefits Mechanism (ABM) and the Local Climate Adaptive Living Facility (LoCAL), as well as the finalisation of the Paris Agreement Rulebook at COP26. Accordingly, this paper uses a transnational framing to explore these developments and the potential impacts of NMAs under Article 6.8, with particular attention towards financial and ideological considerations.

查看原文本刊更多论文

《巴黎协定》第6.8条下的非市场机制:跨国视角

摘要第6.8条是在多年倡导非市场方法（NMA）（主要来自玻利维亚）后，在COP15的最后几分钟被纳入《巴黎协定》的。然而，在2015年至2021年间，NMA的发展基本上停滞不前，并在谈判期间受到意识形态和财务分歧的阻碍。尽管存在挑战，但根据第6.8条实施NMA的工作最近开始形成。推动这一进程的是相关试点项目的发展和成熟，如适应效益机制（ABM）和当地气候适应性生活设施（Local），以及《巴黎协定》规则手册在COP26上的最终确定。因此，本文采用跨国框架来探讨这些发展以及第6.8条下NMA的潜在影响，特别注意财务和意识形态方面的考虑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Transnational Legal Theory Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The objective of Transnational Legal Theory is to publish high-quality theoretical scholarship that addresses transnational dimensions of law and legal dimensions of transnational fields and activity. Central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is publication of work that explores whether and how transnational contexts, forces and ideations affect debates within existing traditions or schools of legal thought. Similarly, the journal aspires to encourage scholars debating general theories about law to consider the relevance of transnational contexts and dimensions for their work. With respect to particular jurisprudence, the journal welcomes not only submissions that involve theoretical explorations of fields commonly constructed as transnational in nature (such as commercial law, maritime law, or cyberlaw) but also explorations of transnational aspects of fields less commonly understood in this way (for example, criminal law, family law, company law, tort law, evidence law, and so on). Submissions of work exploring process-oriented approaches to law as transnational (from transjurisdictional litigation to delocalized arbitration to multi-level governance) are also encouraged. Equally central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is theoretical work that explores fresh (or revived) understandings of international law and comparative law ''beyond the state'' (and the interstate). The journal has a special interest in submissions that explore the interfaces, intersections, and mutual embeddedness of public international law, private international law, and comparative law, notably in terms of whether such inter-relationships are reshaping these sub-disciplines in directions that are, in important respects, transnational in nature.