Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on depressive symptoms in patients with substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Q4 Nursing
Chuntana Reangsing, Sasinun Pusuwun, Suneerat Boonsin, S. Oerther
{"title":"Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on depressive symptoms in patients with substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Chuntana Reangsing, Sasinun Pusuwun, Suneerat Boonsin, S. Oerther","doi":"10.2478/fon-2023-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective We examined the effects of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on depressive symptoms in patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) and explored the moderating effects of participant, method, and intervention characteristics. Methods We systematically searched 8 databases from their inception till November 2021. The inclusion criteria were primary studies evaluating MBIs in patients with SUDs with depression measured as an outcome, those including a control group, and those written in English. We used a random-effects model to compute effect sizes (ESs) using Hedges’ g, a forest plot, and Q and I2 statistics as measures of heterogeneity; we also examined moderator analyses. Results Nineteen studies included 1352 participants (age: 38.6 ± 7.0 years). Overall, MBIs showed significantly improved depression (g = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29, 1.05, I2 = 89%) compared to controls. With regard to moderators, providing MBIs as an individual plus group intervention had a greater effect (g = 2.13) on reducing depressive symptoms than providing MBIs as a group intervention (g = 0.64) or an individual intervention only (g = 0.33, P = 0.034). Using concealed allocation tended to reduce depressive symptoms (g = 1.22) as compared to not using concealed allocation (g = 0.48, P = 0.086). No other quality indicators were demonstrated to have a moderating influence on the value of the ES. Conclusions MBIs improved depressive symptoms in patients with SUDs. MBIs might be used as an adjunctive or alternative to conventional treatment for depressed patients with SUDs.","PeriodicalId":52206,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2023-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective We examined the effects of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on depressive symptoms in patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) and explored the moderating effects of participant, method, and intervention characteristics. Methods We systematically searched 8 databases from their inception till November 2021. The inclusion criteria were primary studies evaluating MBIs in patients with SUDs with depression measured as an outcome, those including a control group, and those written in English. We used a random-effects model to compute effect sizes (ESs) using Hedges’ g, a forest plot, and Q and I2 statistics as measures of heterogeneity; we also examined moderator analyses. Results Nineteen studies included 1352 participants (age: 38.6 ± 7.0 years). Overall, MBIs showed significantly improved depression (g = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29, 1.05, I2 = 89%) compared to controls. With regard to moderators, providing MBIs as an individual plus group intervention had a greater effect (g = 2.13) on reducing depressive symptoms than providing MBIs as a group intervention (g = 0.64) or an individual intervention only (g = 0.33, P = 0.034). Using concealed allocation tended to reduce depressive symptoms (g = 1.22) as compared to not using concealed allocation (g = 0.48, P = 0.086). No other quality indicators were demonstrated to have a moderating influence on the value of the ES. Conclusions MBIs improved depressive symptoms in patients with SUDs. MBIs might be used as an adjunctive or alternative to conventional treatment for depressed patients with SUDs.
基于正念的干预措施对药物使用障碍患者抑郁症状的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析
摘要目的研究基于正念的干预措施(MBI)对物质使用障碍(SUDs)患者抑郁症状的影响,并探讨参与者、方法和干预特征的调节作用。方法系统检索8个数据库,从建立到2021年11月。纳入标准是评估抑郁症SUDs患者MBI的初步研究,包括对照组和用英语书写的MBI。我们使用随机效应模型来计算效应大小(ES),使用Hedges’g、森林图以及Q和I2统计数据作为异质性的度量;我们还研究了调节因子分析。结果19项研究包括1352名参与者(年龄:38.6±7.0岁)。总体而言,与对照组相比,MBI显示出显著改善的抑郁(g=0.67,95%置信区间[CI]:0.29,1.05,I2=89%)。关于主持人,在减少抑郁症状方面,提供MBI作为个人加团体干预的效果(g=2.13)比提供MBI为团体干预(g=0.64)或仅提供个人干预(g0.33,P=0.034)更大。与不使用隐蔽分配(g=0.48,P=0.086)相比,使用隐蔽分配倾向于减少抑郁症状(g=1.22)。没有其他质量各项指标对ES值有一定的调节作用。结论MBI改善了SUDs患者的抑郁症状。MBI可作为SUDs抑郁症患者常规治疗的辅助或替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers of Nursing
Frontiers of Nursing Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信