Expanding access to rectal spacers in the United Kingdom: an examination of current evidence and an early review of data from a single institution

IF 0.3 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
I. Watts, A. Clifford, S. Needleman, Ashoke Roy, C. Hartill, Alexandra Gore, M. Prentice
{"title":"Expanding access to rectal spacers in the United Kingdom: an examination of current evidence and an early review of data from a single institution","authors":"I. Watts, A. Clifford, S. Needleman, Ashoke Roy, C. Hartill, Alexandra Gore, M. Prentice","doi":"10.1017/S146039692200022X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Prostate cancer is a common malignancy with rising incidence in Western countries such as the United Kingdom. In localised disease there are a variety of curative treatment modalities. Patients can be referred for surgery, or for a combination of hormonal therapies and radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy). Each treatment option comes with side effects and in the case of radiotherapy one potential complication is bowel toxicity from radiation exposure. New technologies are being developed to try and mitigate the side effects and long term morbidity of this treatment, and to expand access to radiotherapy for patients who may previously have been excluded (i.e those with inflammatory bowel disease). Rectal Spacers are absorbable polyethylene glycol hydrogels injected into the perirectal space. These position the anterior rectal wall away from the prostate, subsequently minimising radiation dose to the rectum. Rectal Spacers have been introduced to National Healthcare Service (NHS) practice as part of the Innovation and Technology Payment (ITP) programme, however, their use is now under review. Methodology and Results: In this editorial we conduct a narrative review of some of the available evidence for Rectal Spacers, discuss their utilization within the NHS and the barriers to their wider use. We also explore preliminary dosimetry and quality of life data for use of Rectal Spacers in our centre where we have been part of the NHS ITP programme. Dosimetry data and Quality of life questionnaires were gathered from 22 treated patients and 11 matched controls. This indicated lower radiation doses to the prostate in those treated with Rectal Spacers. Conclusion: Rectal Spacers are an effective method to reduce radiation dose to the prostate in men treated for localised prostate cancer, however, their use remains under review in the NHS and there are a variety of barriers to upscaling their use.","PeriodicalId":44597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S146039692200022X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Prostate cancer is a common malignancy with rising incidence in Western countries such as the United Kingdom. In localised disease there are a variety of curative treatment modalities. Patients can be referred for surgery, or for a combination of hormonal therapies and radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy). Each treatment option comes with side effects and in the case of radiotherapy one potential complication is bowel toxicity from radiation exposure. New technologies are being developed to try and mitigate the side effects and long term morbidity of this treatment, and to expand access to radiotherapy for patients who may previously have been excluded (i.e those with inflammatory bowel disease). Rectal Spacers are absorbable polyethylene glycol hydrogels injected into the perirectal space. These position the anterior rectal wall away from the prostate, subsequently minimising radiation dose to the rectum. Rectal Spacers have been introduced to National Healthcare Service (NHS) practice as part of the Innovation and Technology Payment (ITP) programme, however, their use is now under review. Methodology and Results: In this editorial we conduct a narrative review of some of the available evidence for Rectal Spacers, discuss their utilization within the NHS and the barriers to their wider use. We also explore preliminary dosimetry and quality of life data for use of Rectal Spacers in our centre where we have been part of the NHS ITP programme. Dosimetry data and Quality of life questionnaires were gathered from 22 treated patients and 11 matched controls. This indicated lower radiation doses to the prostate in those treated with Rectal Spacers. Conclusion: Rectal Spacers are an effective method to reduce radiation dose to the prostate in men treated for localised prostate cancer, however, their use remains under review in the NHS and there are a variety of barriers to upscaling their use.
在英国扩大直肠垫片的使用范围:对现有证据的审查和对单一机构数据的早期审查
摘要背景:癌症是一种常见的恶性肿瘤,在英国等西方国家发病率不断上升。在局部疾病中,有多种治疗方式。患者可以接受手术治疗,也可以接受激素治疗和放射治疗(外照射放射治疗或近距离放射治疗)的组合治疗。每种治疗方案都有副作用,在放射治疗的情况下,一个潜在的并发症是辐射暴露引起的肠道毒性。正在开发新技术,试图减轻这种治疗的副作用和长期发病率,并扩大以前可能被排除在外的患者(即炎症性肠病患者)获得放射治疗的机会。直肠间隔器是一种可吸收的聚乙二醇水凝胶,注入直肠周围空间。这些措施使直肠前壁远离前列腺,从而最大限度地减少对直肠的辐射剂量。直肠间隔器已被引入国家医疗服务体系(NHS),作为创新和技术支付(ITP)计划的一部分,但其使用目前正在审查中。方法和结果:在这篇社论中,我们对直肠间隔器的一些可用证据进行了叙述性审查,讨论了它们在英国国家医疗服务体系中的使用以及更广泛使用的障碍。我们还探索了在我们的中心使用直肠间隔器的初步剂量测定和生活质量数据,我们是NHS ITP计划的一部分。从22名接受治疗的患者和11名匹配的对照组中收集剂量测定数据和生活质量问卷。这表明接受直肠间隔器治疗的患者前列腺的辐射剂量较低。结论:直肠间隔器是一种有效的方法,可以减少接受局部前列腺癌症治疗的男性前列腺的辐射剂量,然而,在英国国家医疗服务体系中,直肠间隔器的使用仍在审查中,扩大其使用存在各种障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice is a peer-reviewed journal covering all of the current modalities specific to clinical oncology and radiotherapy. The journal aims to publish research from a wide range of styles and encourage debate and the exchange of information and opinion from within the field of radiotherapy practice and clinical oncology. The journal also aims to encourage technical evaluations and case studies as well as equipment reviews that will be of interest to an international radiotherapy audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信