Ifá/Orisha Digital Counterpublics

IF 0.5 Q4 ETHNIC STUDIES
N. F. Castor
{"title":"Ifá/Orisha Digital Counterpublics","authors":"N. F. Castor","doi":"10.1080/00064246.2022.2079065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“I fá/Orisha Digital Counterpublics” offers an ethnographic reflection on post-Ferguson social justice initiatives in African Diasporic religions (ADRs), organized largely on social media, viewing them as part of a digital counterpublic. The opening section includesmethodology in digital ethnography, touches on the literature on the digital and ADRs, and introduces an interpretive framework of spiritual citizenship in action. The second section recounts my experience of joining a Facebook initiative to “wear white” while praying for peace and social justice through an organization called Oloshas United. Following that I explore an Ifá Temple that uses multiple social media modalities, including live streaming, to organize across the US and beyond, forming a virtual collectivity that supported in person rituals towards collective social change. Together these examples speak of a spiritual praxis, that is, the deployment of ritual to affect change. The closing section raises questions directed at ADRs contribution to social justice organizing and digital counterpublics as an example of spiritual citizenship in action. When speaking of African Diasporic religions in digital space I mean specifically computer-mediated-communication and other technologies in the building, experience, and expression of African diaspora religious communities and their attending ritual practices, with a generous and expansive category that includes various forms: Yorùbá informed religions, Vodoun, Akan, Kumina, and Rastafari, among many others. To inform my discussion of ADRs online I draw on the growing body of scholarship in Digital Religion Studies and Black Digital Humanities (including Black cyberspace studies and Black code studies) and put these literatures into conversation with an ethnographic analysis grounded in the scholarship of Black Studies, Caribbean and African Diaspora Studies, and Black Feminist Studies. These scholarships led me to view ADR online organizing through the conceptualization of digital counterpublics, defined by Hill as “any virtual, online, or otherwise digitally networked community in which members actively resist hegemonic power, contest majoritarian narratives, engage in critical dialogues, or negotiate oppositional identities.” I find this definition to be useful in this context for linking online social activism with organizing in the ADR community over the past decades.","PeriodicalId":45369,"journal":{"name":"BLACK SCHOLAR","volume":"52 1","pages":"17 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BLACK SCHOLAR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2022.2079065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“I fá/Orisha Digital Counterpublics” offers an ethnographic reflection on post-Ferguson social justice initiatives in African Diasporic religions (ADRs), organized largely on social media, viewing them as part of a digital counterpublic. The opening section includesmethodology in digital ethnography, touches on the literature on the digital and ADRs, and introduces an interpretive framework of spiritual citizenship in action. The second section recounts my experience of joining a Facebook initiative to “wear white” while praying for peace and social justice through an organization called Oloshas United. Following that I explore an Ifá Temple that uses multiple social media modalities, including live streaming, to organize across the US and beyond, forming a virtual collectivity that supported in person rituals towards collective social change. Together these examples speak of a spiritual praxis, that is, the deployment of ritual to affect change. The closing section raises questions directed at ADRs contribution to social justice organizing and digital counterpublics as an example of spiritual citizenship in action. When speaking of African Diasporic religions in digital space I mean specifically computer-mediated-communication and other technologies in the building, experience, and expression of African diaspora religious communities and their attending ritual practices, with a generous and expansive category that includes various forms: Yorùbá informed religions, Vodoun, Akan, Kumina, and Rastafari, among many others. To inform my discussion of ADRs online I draw on the growing body of scholarship in Digital Religion Studies and Black Digital Humanities (including Black cyberspace studies and Black code studies) and put these literatures into conversation with an ethnographic analysis grounded in the scholarship of Black Studies, Caribbean and African Diaspora Studies, and Black Feminist Studies. These scholarships led me to view ADR online organizing through the conceptualization of digital counterpublics, defined by Hill as “any virtual, online, or otherwise digitally networked community in which members actively resist hegemonic power, contest majoritarian narratives, engage in critical dialogues, or negotiate oppositional identities.” I find this definition to be useful in this context for linking online social activism with organizing in the ADR community over the past decades.
Ifa/Orisha数字柜台
“I fá/Orisha数字反公众”主要在社交媒体上组织,将其视为数字反公众的一部分,对弗格森时代后非洲无孢子宗教(ADR)的社会正义倡议进行了民族志反思。开篇部分包括数字民族志的方法论,涉及数字和ADR的文献,并介绍了精神公民在行动中的解释框架。第二部分讲述了我通过一个名为Oloshas United的组织加入Facebook“穿白色衣服”的倡议,同时祈祷和平与社会正义的经历。之后,我探索了一个IfáTemple,它使用多种社交媒体模式,包括直播,在美国内外组织起来,形成一个虚拟的集体,支持面对面的集体社会变革仪式。这些例子共同说明了一种精神实践,即运用仪式来影响变革。最后一节针对ADR对社会正义组织的贡献和作为精神公民在行动中的例子的数字反公开提出了问题。当谈到数字空间中的非洲散居宗教时,我指的是在非洲散居者宗教社区的建设、体验和表达以及他们参加的仪式实践中使用的计算机媒介通信和其他技术,这是一个慷慨而广泛的类别,包括各种形式:约鲁巴知情宗教、Vodoun、Akan、Kumina和Rastafari,等等。为了在网上了解我对ADR的讨论,我借鉴了越来越多的数字宗教研究和黑人数字人文学科(包括黑人网络空间研究和黑人代码研究)的学术成果,并将这些文献与基于黑人研究、加勒比和非洲流散研究以及黑人女权主义研究的人种学分析进行了对话。这些奖学金使我通过数字反出版物的概念化来看待ADR的在线组织,Hill将其定义为“任何虚拟、在线或其他数字网络社区,在这些社区中,成员积极抵制霸权,对抗多数派叙事,参与批判性对话,或协商对立身份。“我发现这个定义在过去几十年中有助于将在线社会激进主义与ADR社区的组织联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BLACK SCHOLAR
BLACK SCHOLAR ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Founded in 1969 and hailed by The New York Times as "a journal in which the writings of many of today"s finest black thinkers may be viewed," THE BLACK SCHOLAR has firmly established itself as the leading journal of black cultural and political thought in the United States. In its pages African American studies intellectuals, community activists, and national and international political leaders come to grips with basic issues confronting black America and Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信