Initial Experience of 18 F-FET PET-MR Image Fusion for Evaluation of Recurrent Primary Brain Tumors

IF 0.6 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Habibollah Dadgar, M. S. Vafaee, Amirreza Khorasanchi, Parastoo Kordestani Moghadam, Reza Nemati, Hossein Shooli, Esmail Jafari, Majid Assadi
{"title":"Initial Experience of 18 F-FET PET-MR Image Fusion for Evaluation of Recurrent Primary Brain Tumors","authors":"Habibollah Dadgar, M. S. Vafaee, Amirreza Khorasanchi, Parastoo Kordestani Moghadam, Reza Nemati, Hossein Shooli, Esmail Jafari, Majid Assadi","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  An accurate monitoring technique is crucial in brain tumors to choose the best treatment approach after surgery and/or chemoradiation. Radiological assessment of brain tumors is widely based on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modality in this regard; however, MRI criteria are unable to precisely differentiate tumoral tissue from treatment-related changes. This study was conducted to evaluate whether fused MRI and O-(2- 18 F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ( 18 F-FET) positron emission tomography (PET) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of the practitioners to discriminate treatment-related changes from true recurrence of brain tumor. Methods  We retrospectively analyzed 18 F-FET PET/computed tomography (CT) of 11 patients with histopathologically proven brain tumors that were suspicious for recurrence changes after 3 to 4 months of surgery. All the patients underwent MRI and 18 F-FET PET/CT. As a third assessment, fused 18 F-FET PET/MRI was also acquired. Finally, the diagnostic accuracy of the applied modalities was compared. Results  Eleven patients aged 27 to 73 years with a mean age of 47 ± 13 years were enrolled. According to the results, 9/11 cases (82%) showed positive MRI and 6 cases (55%) showed positive PET/CT and PET/MRI. Tumoral recurrence was observed in six patients (55%) in the follow-up period. Based on the follow-up results, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 64, 85, 25, 67, and 50%, respectively, for MRI alone and 91, 85, 100, 100, and 80%, respectively, for both PET/CT and PET/MRI. Conclusion  This study found that 18 F-FET PET-MR image fusion in the management of brain tumors might improve recurrence detection; however, further well-designed studies are needed to verify these preliminary data.","PeriodicalId":23742,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background  An accurate monitoring technique is crucial in brain tumors to choose the best treatment approach after surgery and/or chemoradiation. Radiological assessment of brain tumors is widely based on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modality in this regard; however, MRI criteria are unable to precisely differentiate tumoral tissue from treatment-related changes. This study was conducted to evaluate whether fused MRI and O-(2- 18 F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ( 18 F-FET) positron emission tomography (PET) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of the practitioners to discriminate treatment-related changes from true recurrence of brain tumor. Methods  We retrospectively analyzed 18 F-FET PET/computed tomography (CT) of 11 patients with histopathologically proven brain tumors that were suspicious for recurrence changes after 3 to 4 months of surgery. All the patients underwent MRI and 18 F-FET PET/CT. As a third assessment, fused 18 F-FET PET/MRI was also acquired. Finally, the diagnostic accuracy of the applied modalities was compared. Results  Eleven patients aged 27 to 73 years with a mean age of 47 ± 13 years were enrolled. According to the results, 9/11 cases (82%) showed positive MRI and 6 cases (55%) showed positive PET/CT and PET/MRI. Tumoral recurrence was observed in six patients (55%) in the follow-up period. Based on the follow-up results, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 64, 85, 25, 67, and 50%, respectively, for MRI alone and 91, 85, 100, 100, and 80%, respectively, for both PET/CT and PET/MRI. Conclusion  This study found that 18 F-FET PET-MR image fusion in the management of brain tumors might improve recurrence detection; however, further well-designed studies are needed to verify these preliminary data.
18f - fet PET-MR影像融合评估复发性原发性脑肿瘤的初步经验
摘要背景 准确的监测技术对于脑肿瘤手术和/或放化疗后选择最佳治疗方法至关重要。在这方面,脑肿瘤的放射学评估广泛基于磁共振成像(MRI)模式;然而,MRI标准无法准确区分肿瘤组织和治疗相关的变化。本研究旨在评估融合MRI和O-(2-18F-氟乙基)-L-酪氨酸(18F-FET)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)是否可以提高从业者的诊断准确性,以区分脑肿瘤的治疗相关变化和真实复发。方法 我们回顾性分析了11名经组织病理学证实的脑肿瘤患者的18例F-FET PET/计算机断层扫描(CT),这些患者在手术3至4个月后可能出现复发变化。所有患者均行MRI和18F-FET PET/CT检查。作为第三项评估,还采集了融合的18F-FET PET/MRI。最后,比较了应用模式的诊断准确性。后果 11名患者,年龄在27至73岁之间,平均年龄为47岁 ± 入组13年。结果显示,9/11例(82%)MRI阳性,6例(55%)PET/CT和PET/MRI阳性。在随访期间观察到6名患者(55%)出现肿瘤复发。根据随访结果,单独MRI的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为64%、85%、25%、67%和50%,PET/CT和PET/MRI分别为91%、85%、100%和80%。结论 本研究发现,18F-FET PET-MR图像融合在脑肿瘤治疗中可能提高复发检测率;然而,还需要进一步精心设计的研究来验证这些初步数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Nuclear Medicine
World Journal of Nuclear Medicine RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信