Parenthood: Beyond Maternity and Paternity

Lara McKenzie
{"title":"Parenthood: Beyond Maternity and Paternity","authors":"Lara McKenzie","doi":"10.1002/fea2.12105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Parenthood is a transforming and enduring experience worldwide, yet it occurs in culturally distinctive ways. Anthropologists’ analyses of this aspect of social life need to attend to these distinctions by applying concepts that are flexible but offer meaningful insights. This article investigates the complexities of modern parent–child relations, making two propositions that expand the concept of parenthood. I begin by arguing that the term <i>parenthood</i> should be more widely utilized by anthropologists when investigating kinship, due to its specificity and ability to address and contest issues of care and inequality. The notion of parenthood can reflect a diverse array of practices far beyond those of childbearing heterosexual couples—fostering, adoption, surrogacy, queer parenthoods, and parenthood via assisted reproductive technologies (ART)—while acknowledging the continued salience of normative parenting relations. I propose that feminist anthropologists could use the term <i>parenthood</i> to challenge the gendered assumptions surrounding <i>motherhood</i> and <i>fatherhood</i> (which remain highly influential regardless of parents’ relationship forms and sexualities) and to recognize and facilitate less rigid, less binary parenting performances. Drawing on anthropological, sociological, and feminist works on kinship, reproduction, and gender, I thus advocate for the conceptual utility of the term <i>parenthood</i> and point to future directions for such research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73022,"journal":{"name":"Feminist anthropology","volume":"3 2","pages":"299-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fea2.12105","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fea2.12105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Parenthood is a transforming and enduring experience worldwide, yet it occurs in culturally distinctive ways. Anthropologists’ analyses of this aspect of social life need to attend to these distinctions by applying concepts that are flexible but offer meaningful insights. This article investigates the complexities of modern parent–child relations, making two propositions that expand the concept of parenthood. I begin by arguing that the term parenthood should be more widely utilized by anthropologists when investigating kinship, due to its specificity and ability to address and contest issues of care and inequality. The notion of parenthood can reflect a diverse array of practices far beyond those of childbearing heterosexual couples—fostering, adoption, surrogacy, queer parenthoods, and parenthood via assisted reproductive technologies (ART)—while acknowledging the continued salience of normative parenting relations. I propose that feminist anthropologists could use the term parenthood to challenge the gendered assumptions surrounding motherhood and fatherhood (which remain highly influential regardless of parents’ relationship forms and sexualities) and to recognize and facilitate less rigid, less binary parenting performances. Drawing on anthropological, sociological, and feminist works on kinship, reproduction, and gender, I thus advocate for the conceptual utility of the term parenthood and point to future directions for such research.

亲子关系:超越母性和亲子关系
为人父母在世界范围内都是一种转变和持久的经历,但它以不同的文化方式发生。人类学家在分析社会生活的这一方面时,需要运用灵活但能提供有意义的见解的概念来注意这些区别。本文考察了现代亲子关系的复杂性,提出了两个扩展亲子概念的命题。我首先提出,在研究亲属关系时,人类学家应该更广泛地使用“亲子关系”这个词,因为它的特殊性和解决和争论关爱和不平等问题的能力。亲子关系的概念可以反映出各种各样的实践,远远超出了异性恋夫妇生育的范畴——抚养、收养、代孕、酷儿父母和通过辅助生殖技术(ART)生育——同时承认规范的亲子关系的持续突出。我建议,女权主义人类学家可以用“为人父母”这个词来挑战围绕着母性和父性的性别假设(无论父母的关系形式和性取向如何,这种假设仍然非常有影响力),并承认和促进不那么僵化、不那么二元的养育行为。借鉴人类学、社会学和女权主义关于亲属关系、生殖和性别的著作,我因此提倡“父母”一词的概念效用,并指出此类研究的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信