The Concept of Land Bank Agency: Between Public or Bussiness Functions?

Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa, I. Wijaya, Ni Luh Dewi Sundariwati, Made Dwita Martha
{"title":"The Concept of Land Bank Agency: Between Public or Bussiness Functions?","authors":"Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa, I. Wijaya, Ni Luh Dewi Sundariwati, Made Dwita Martha","doi":"10.31603/variajusticia.v18i2.6619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of a Land Bank entity in the Job Creation Act and its derivative regulations reflects the contradictory dualism of the functions of the Land Bank agency. On the one hand, the Land Bank agency was formed to carry out public functions, but on the other hand, the Land Bank could carry out business activities. The existence of this dualism results in ambiguity and imbalance in the functions of the Land Bank agency. This research aims to examine the concept of a Land Bank entity as contained in the Job Creation Law and its derivative rules and to provide an overview of the model of a Land Bank entity in the future that can balance the implementation of public and business functions. The research used normative legal research supported by the statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that the concept of a Land Bank agency in the Job Creation Law and its derivative rules still reflects the dualism of contradictory functions of the Land Bank agency, namely as executor of public functions and as executor of business activities. It is necessary to revamp the concept of the Land Bank agency to avoid conflicts of interest between public and private scope, by dividing the Land Bank entity into two types, which is the Land Bank entity in the form of public legal entity and/or private legal entity.","PeriodicalId":31904,"journal":{"name":"Varia Justicia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Varia Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v18i2.6619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of a Land Bank entity in the Job Creation Act and its derivative regulations reflects the contradictory dualism of the functions of the Land Bank agency. On the one hand, the Land Bank agency was formed to carry out public functions, but on the other hand, the Land Bank could carry out business activities. The existence of this dualism results in ambiguity and imbalance in the functions of the Land Bank agency. This research aims to examine the concept of a Land Bank entity as contained in the Job Creation Law and its derivative rules and to provide an overview of the model of a Land Bank entity in the future that can balance the implementation of public and business functions. The research used normative legal research supported by the statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that the concept of a Land Bank agency in the Job Creation Law and its derivative rules still reflects the dualism of contradictory functions of the Land Bank agency, namely as executor of public functions and as executor of business activities. It is necessary to revamp the concept of the Land Bank agency to avoid conflicts of interest between public and private scope, by dividing the Land Bank entity into two types, which is the Land Bank entity in the form of public legal entity and/or private legal entity.
土地银行代理机构的概念:公共职能还是商业职能?
《创造就业法》及其衍生法规中的土地银行实体概念反映了土地银行机构职能的矛盾二元论。一方面,成立土地银行机构是为了履行公共职能,但另一方面,土地银行可以开展商业活动。这种二元性的存在导致土地银行机构职能的模糊和不平衡。本研究旨在研究《创造就业法》及其衍生规则中包含的土地银行实体的概念,并概述未来土地银行实体能够平衡公共和商业职能实施的模式。该研究采用了由法定方法和概念方法支持的规范性法律研究。结果表明,《创造就业法》及其衍生规则中的土地银行机构概念仍然反映了土地银行机构作为公共职能执行者和商业活动执行者的矛盾职能的双重性。有必要修改土地银行机构的概念,通过将土地银行实体分为两种类型,即公共法律实体和/或私人法律实体形式的土地银行实体,避免公共和私人范围之间的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信