Learning Styles of Faculty Members

H. Ashrafifard, H. Moonaghi, A. Emadzadeh
{"title":"Learning Styles of Faculty Members","authors":"H. Ashrafifard, H. Moonaghi, A. Emadzadeh","doi":"10.22038/FMEJ.2019.35383.1229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Given importance to learning and given priority to this point that human beings acquire more of their abilities and competencies through learning, learning styles are focused as a pivotal factor in realization of mental and potential abilities. Empowering academic members in the areas of teaching, scholarship, and leadership leads to the achievement of the missions and goals of the educational institutions; therefore, identifying their learning styles and providing training courses will become important. Methods: This is a systematic review that aims to study the learning styles of faculty members. Searching for articles was done online using Persian keywords and their Latin equivalents, including learning style, faculty members, Kolb, VARK, Reidâ��s perceptual learning style preference, Gregorc learning style, Marshall and Merritt learning style, the dominant pharmacy inventory learning styles, individually or in combination in national and international databases, regardless of limitation in time. In the initial search, a total number of 213 studies were found, out of which 15 studies that fully associated with the learning styles of faculty members were carefully reviewed. Results: The findings of the present study were categorized into four tools of Kolbâ��s learning style,  pharmacy inventory learning styles, Gregorc learning style, and Reid's perceptual preferential learning style, among which the dominant learning style of professors was converging and assimilating of Kolb tool, concrete-sequential of Gregorc tool, and assimilating of the pharmacy inventory learning styles tool. Conclusion: Awareness of different learning styles can be used to evaluate and design educational programs, and it is suggested to design empowerment courses of faculty members based on their learning styles.","PeriodicalId":34243,"journal":{"name":"Future of Medical Education Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"9-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2019.35383.1229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Given importance to learning and given priority to this point that human beings acquire more of their abilities and competencies through learning, learning styles are focused as a pivotal factor in realization of mental and potential abilities. Empowering academic members in the areas of teaching, scholarship, and leadership leads to the achievement of the missions and goals of the educational institutions; therefore, identifying their learning styles and providing training courses will become important. Methods: This is a systematic review that aims to study the learning styles of faculty members. Searching for articles was done online using Persian keywords and their Latin equivalents, including learning style, faculty members, Kolb, VARK, Reid�s perceptual learning style preference, Gregorc learning style, Marshall and Merritt learning style, the dominant pharmacy inventory learning styles, individually or in combination in national and international databases, regardless of limitation in time. In the initial search, a total number of 213 studies were found, out of which 15 studies that fully associated with the learning styles of faculty members were carefully reviewed. Results: The findings of the present study were categorized into four tools of Kolb�s learning style,  pharmacy inventory learning styles, Gregorc learning style, and Reid's perceptual preferential learning style, among which the dominant learning style of professors was converging and assimilating of Kolb tool, concrete-sequential of Gregorc tool, and assimilating of the pharmacy inventory learning styles tool. Conclusion: Awareness of different learning styles can be used to evaluate and design educational programs, and it is suggested to design empowerment courses of faculty members based on their learning styles.
教师的学习风格
背景:鉴于学习的重要性,以及人类通过学习获得更多能力和能力这一点,学习风格被视为实现心理和潜在能力的关键因素。在教学、学术和领导领域赋予学术成员权力,有助于实现教育机构的使命和目标;因此,识别他们的学习风格并提供培训课程将变得非常重要。方法:这是一项系统的综述,旨在研究教师的学习风格。在线搜索文章使用波斯语关键词及其拉丁语对应词,包括学习风格、教师、Kolb、VARK、Reidâ��s的感知学习风格偏好、Gregorc学习风格、Marshall和Merritt学习风格,这是国家和国际数据库中占主导地位的药学库存学习风格,无论时间限制如何。在最初的搜索中,共发现213项研究,其中15项与教员的学习风格完全相关的研究被仔细审查。结果:本研究的结果分为Kolbâ的四个工具��s的学习风格、药学库存学习风格、Gregorc的学习风格和Reid的感性优先学习风格,其中教授的主导学习风格是对Kolb工具的融合和同化、Gregorc工具的具体序列和药学库存学习样式工具的同化。结论:不同学习风格的认知可以用于评估和设计教育方案,建议根据教师的学习风格设计教师赋权课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信