The surgeon’s acupuncturist: Philipp Franz von Siebold’s encounter with Ishizaka Sōtetsu and nineteenth century Japanese acupuncture

M. Vigouroux
{"title":"The surgeon’s acupuncturist: Philipp Franz von Siebold’s encounter with Ishizaka Sōtetsu and nineteenth century Japanese acupuncture","authors":"M. Vigouroux","doi":"10.3917/RHS.701.0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contrast to the first European descriptions of acupuncture by Willem Ten Rhjine and Engelbert Kaempfer in the last decades of the seventeenth century, Philipp Franz von Siebold’s notes did not receive much attention upon his return to Holland in 1828. Siebold’s interest in acupuncture was different from that of his predecessors, as he was not interested in acupuncture in general – as Rhjine and Kaempfer were – but in the theories of Ishizaka Sōtetsu 石坂宗哲, an early nineteenth century Japanese acupuncturist who attempted to bridge the gap between Western and Sino-Japanese medicine. In this essay, I first reconstruct Siebold’s encounter with Ishizaka using rare materials held by Leiden University library, Leiden National Museum of Ethnology, and the Ishizaka family. Then, I review the new developments happening in Japanese acupuncture at the turn of the nineteenth century. I show how Ishizaka applied his knowledge on Western anatomy to acupuncture, contending that it gave him new methodological and epistemological tools to reconstruct acupuncture theories into his own theoretical framework. This allowed him to place himself in the debates that flourished in Japanese medicine since the late seventeenth century. Finally, I examine the reasons of Siebold’s interest for Ishizaka’s theories and his contribution to their diffusion in Europe.","PeriodicalId":82560,"journal":{"name":"Revue d'histoire des sciences et de leurs applications","volume":"70 1","pages":"79-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue d'histoire des sciences et de leurs applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/RHS.701.0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contrast to the first European descriptions of acupuncture by Willem Ten Rhjine and Engelbert Kaempfer in the last decades of the seventeenth century, Philipp Franz von Siebold’s notes did not receive much attention upon his return to Holland in 1828. Siebold’s interest in acupuncture was different from that of his predecessors, as he was not interested in acupuncture in general – as Rhjine and Kaempfer were – but in the theories of Ishizaka Sōtetsu 石坂宗哲, an early nineteenth century Japanese acupuncturist who attempted to bridge the gap between Western and Sino-Japanese medicine. In this essay, I first reconstruct Siebold’s encounter with Ishizaka using rare materials held by Leiden University library, Leiden National Museum of Ethnology, and the Ishizaka family. Then, I review the new developments happening in Japanese acupuncture at the turn of the nineteenth century. I show how Ishizaka applied his knowledge on Western anatomy to acupuncture, contending that it gave him new methodological and epistemological tools to reconstruct acupuncture theories into his own theoretical framework. This allowed him to place himself in the debates that flourished in Japanese medicine since the late seventeenth century. Finally, I examine the reasons of Siebold’s interest for Ishizaka’s theories and his contribution to their diffusion in Europe.
外科医生的针灸师:菲利普·弗朗茨·冯·西博尔德与石坂和十九世纪日本针灸的相遇
与威廉·滕·莱茵和恩格尔伯特·坎普费尔在17世纪最后几十年首次在欧洲描述针灸相比,菲利普·弗朗茨·冯·西博尔德的笔记在1828年回到荷兰后并没有受到太多关注。西博尔德对针灸的兴趣不同于他的前任,因为他不像莱茵和坎普弗尔那样对针灸感兴趣,而是对石坂Sōtetsu的理论感兴趣,石坂是19世纪早期的一位日本针灸师,他试图弥合西方医学和中日医学之间的鸿沟。在本文中,我首先利用莱顿大学图书馆、莱顿国家民族学博物馆和石坂家族所拥有的珍贵资料,重构了西博尔德与石坂的相遇。然后,我回顾了19世纪初日本针灸的新发展。我展示了石坂是如何将他在西方解剖学上的知识应用于针灸的,他认为这给了他新的方法论和认识论工具,将针灸理论重构到他自己的理论框架中。这使他能够置身于自17世纪晚期以来日本医学蓬勃发展的辩论中。最后,我考察了西博尔德对石坂的理论感兴趣的原因,以及他对这些理论在欧洲传播的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信