Book Review: Between Market Economy and State Capitalism: China’s State-Owned Enterprises and the World Trading System by Henry Gao and Weihuan Zhou

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
D. Mumby, J. Hartley, D. Fryer, R. Henry, K. Rogers, J. A. Waterworth, D. Cramer, Alan Garnham
{"title":"Book Review: Between Market Economy and State Capitalism: China’s State-Owned Enterprises and the World Trading System by Henry Gao and Weihuan Zhou","authors":"D. Mumby, J. Hartley, D. Fryer, R. Henry, K. Rogers, J. A. Waterworth, D. Cramer, Alan Garnham","doi":"10.1177/0920203X231180070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China’s economy has grown steadily despite the rise and fall of globalism and antiglobalism in the past two decades. Its Western trading partners often criticize its manipulation of trade practices through the so-called state capitalism model. As the United States and others claim, China has successfully emerged as the largest trader in the world. ‘Yet, having the right elements can only guarantee a nice story, not the correct answer’ (p. 2). This book sets out to investigate the relationship between China’s state capitalism and WTO rules, offering recommendations for further promoting world trade rules and practices. The book consists of eight chapters. Chapter 1 presents the background of the book by providing definitions of some key concepts such as state capitalism and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and introducing the challenges posed by SOEs to the global trading system. Chapter 2 reveals how the Chinese government has enhanced its influence over SOEs. Chapter 3 debunks the myth of China’s state capitalism. WTO members have been well aware of the clashes between WTO rules and China’s state capitalism since the very beginning. Bearing these problems in mind, WTO members have carefully crafted practical solutions to reinforce a category of WTO rules in order to discipline ‘market-distortive behaviours of SOEs and subsidies that enhance their competitive advantages’ (p. 10). These solutions are discussed in Chapters 4 and 5. Recent rulings by the Appellate Body have contributed to the ‘softness’ of WTO rules, because of which the crafted solutions as discussed in Chapter 4 are all of limited utility. To rebut the claim that all WTO rules are useless, the analysis in Chapter 5 underlines the promising potential of some China-specific rules in the original Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Book reviews","PeriodicalId":45809,"journal":{"name":"China Information","volume":"37 1","pages":"299 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Information","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X231180070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China’s economy has grown steadily despite the rise and fall of globalism and antiglobalism in the past two decades. Its Western trading partners often criticize its manipulation of trade practices through the so-called state capitalism model. As the United States and others claim, China has successfully emerged as the largest trader in the world. ‘Yet, having the right elements can only guarantee a nice story, not the correct answer’ (p. 2). This book sets out to investigate the relationship between China’s state capitalism and WTO rules, offering recommendations for further promoting world trade rules and practices. The book consists of eight chapters. Chapter 1 presents the background of the book by providing definitions of some key concepts such as state capitalism and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and introducing the challenges posed by SOEs to the global trading system. Chapter 2 reveals how the Chinese government has enhanced its influence over SOEs. Chapter 3 debunks the myth of China’s state capitalism. WTO members have been well aware of the clashes between WTO rules and China’s state capitalism since the very beginning. Bearing these problems in mind, WTO members have carefully crafted practical solutions to reinforce a category of WTO rules in order to discipline ‘market-distortive behaviours of SOEs and subsidies that enhance their competitive advantages’ (p. 10). These solutions are discussed in Chapters 4 and 5. Recent rulings by the Appellate Body have contributed to the ‘softness’ of WTO rules, because of which the crafted solutions as discussed in Chapter 4 are all of limited utility. To rebut the claim that all WTO rules are useless, the analysis in Chapter 5 underlines the promising potential of some China-specific rules in the original Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Book reviews
书评:《在市场经济与国家资本主义之间:中国国有企业与世界贸易体系》,作者:高享、周卫环
在过去二十年中,尽管全球主义和反全球主义此起彼伏,但中国经济仍在稳步增长。其西方贸易伙伴经常批评其通过所谓的国家资本主义模式操纵贸易行为。正如美国和其他国家所宣称的那样,中国已经成功地成为世界上最大的贸易国然而,拥有正确的元素只能保证一个好故事,而不是正确的答案。本书旨在探讨中国的国家资本主义与WTO规则之间的关系,为进一步推动世界贸易规则和实践提供建议。这本书由八章组成。第一章介绍了本书的背景,提供了一些关键概念的定义,如国家资本主义和国有企业,并介绍了国有企业对全球贸易体系构成的挑战。第二章揭示了中国政府如何增强对国有企业的影响力。第三章揭穿了中国国家资本主义的神话。世贸组织成员从一开始就很清楚世贸组织规则与中国国家资本主义之间的冲突。考虑到这些问题,世贸组织成员精心制定了切实可行的解决方案,以加强世贸组织的一类规则,以约束“国有企业扭曲市场的行为和提高其竞争优势的补贴”(第10页)。这些解决方案将在第4章和第5章中讨论。上诉机构最近的裁决助长了世贸组织规则的“软性”,因此第4章中讨论的精心制定的解决方案的效用都很有限。为了反驳世贸组织所有规则都是无用的说法,第五章的分析强调了原《补贴和反补贴协定》书评中一些针对中国的规则的潜力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
China Information
China Information AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: China Information presents timely and in-depth analyses of major developments in contemporary China and overseas Chinese communities in the areas of politics, economics, law, ecology, culture, and society, including literature and the arts. China Information pays special attention to views and areas that do not receive sufficient attention in the mainstream discourse on contemporary China. It encourages discussion and debate between different academic traditions, offers a platform to express controversial and dissenting opinions, and promotes research that is historically sensitive and contemporarily relevant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信